Abstract
Bioformulations significantly reduced population of Meloidogyne incognita, root galling severity and enhanced fruit yield of okra under field conditions. The population of M. incognita was relatively low in the plots receiving seed treatment with Paecilomyces lilacinus, Pochonia chlamydosporia and Pseudomonas fluorescens (10g/kg seed). However, the highest fruit yield was obtained with the application of P. lilacinus (10g/kg + FYM 10t/ha). Results of second season in the same fields during October-January, 2011–2012 confirmed that at higher initial nematode population (465/200cm3soil), adoption of above treatments showed little impact on reduction of nematode population, infection on okra and root galling severity. However, seed treatment with bioformulations (at 10g/kg of seed) proved as the most economical recommendation for root-knot nematode management in okra. This was followed by application of P. lilacinus (10g/kg seed) +FYM at 10t/ha. The study results demonstrated using bioformulations as seed treatment in the highly infested fields of root knot nematode is ineffective for the protection of okra from the infestation of root-knot nematode.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Bioformulations reduced nematode populations significantly.
- Treatment
- Bioformulationse0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognita
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=60)
Meloidogyne incognitae0pathogen - Outcome
- population of Meloidogyne incognitae0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Bioformulations significantly reduced population of Meloidogyne incognita”
Claim · model-written summary
Bioformulations reduced root galling severity significantly.
- Treatment
- Bioformulationse0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
- Outcome
- root galling severitye0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Bioformulations significantly reduced population of Meloidogyne incognita, root galling severity”
Claim · model-written summary
Bioformulations enhanced okra fruit yield.
- Taxon
- okra
.jpg?width=60)
Abelmoschus esculentuse0 - Outcome
- fruit yielde0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Setting
- field conditionse0
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“enhanced fruit yield of okra under field conditions.”
Claim · model-written summary
Nematode populations were relatively low following Paecilomyces lilacinus seed treatment.
- Treatment
- seed treatment with Paecilomyces lilacinuse0
- Interactor
- M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
- Outcome
- population of M. incognitae0
- Direction
- relatively lowe0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The population of M. incognita was relatively low in the plots receiving seed treatment with Paecilomyces lilacinus, Pochonia chlamydosporia and Pseudomonas fluorescens (10g/kg seed).”
Claim · model-written summary
Nematode populations were relatively low following Pochonia chlamydosporia seed treatment.
- Treatment
- Pochonia chlamydosporiae0
- Interactor
- M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
- Outcome
- population of M. incognitae0
- Direction
- relatively lowe0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The population of M. incognita was relatively low in the plots receiving seed treatment with Paecilomyces lilacinus, Pochonia chlamydosporia and Pseudomonas fluorescens (10g/kg seed).”
Claim · model-written summary
Nematode populations were relatively low following Pseudomonas fluorescens seed treatment.
- Treatment
- Pseudomonas fluorescense0
- Interactor
- M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
- Outcome
- population of M. incognitae0
- Direction
- relatively lowe0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The population of M. incognita was relatively low in the plots receiving seed treatment with Paecilomyces lilacinus, Pochonia chlamydosporia and Pseudomonas fluorescens (10g/kg seed).”
Claim · model-written summary
Paecilomyces lilacinus plus FYM produced the highest fruit yield.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“the highest fruit yield was obtained with the application of P. lilacinus (10g/kg + FYM 10t/ha).”
Claim · model-written summary
At high initial nematode populations, treatments had little effect on nematode population, infection and galling.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse0
- Treatment
- above treatmentse0
- Outcome
- nematode population, infection on okra and root galling severitye0
- Direction
- little impacte0
- Qualifier
- higher initial nematode population (465/200cm3soil)e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“at higher initial nematode population (465/200cm3soil), adoption of above treatments showed little impact on reduction of nematode population, infection on okra and root galling severity.”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed treatment with bioformulations was recommended as most economical.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse0
- Outcome
- seed treatment with bioformulations (at 10g/kg of seed)e0
- Direction
- most economicale0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“seed treatment with bioformulations (at 10g/kg of seed) proved as the most economical recommendation for root-knot nematode management in okra.”
Claim · model-written summary
Paecilomyces lilacinus plus FYM was the next most economical option.
- Outcome
- application of P. lilacinus (10g/kg seed) +FYM at 10t/hae0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“This was followed by application of P. lilacinus (10g/kg seed) +FYM at 10t/ha.”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed bioformulations were ineffective for protecting okra in highly infested fields.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse0
- Treatment
- bioformulations as seed treatmente0
- Outcome
- protection of okra from the infestation of root-knot nematodee0
- Direction
- ineffectivee0
- Qualifier
- highly infested fieldse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“using bioformulations as seed treatment in the highly infested fields of root knot nematode is ineffective for the protection of okra from the infestation of root-knot nematode.”
The same questions in other papers
Purpureocillium lilacinum · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Pochonia chlamydosporia · Meloidogyne incognita · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Pseudomonas fluorescens · Meloidogyne incognita · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Purpureocillium lilacinum · Meloidogyne incognita · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
12 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →seed treatment · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →fertilization · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
354 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
369 papers more in this group
See all 373 papers →seed treatment · Meloidogyne incognita · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
15 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.