Paper · 2014 · Pest Management in Horticultural Ecosystems

Evaluation of bio-efficacy of Bacillus subtilis (NBAIMCC-B-01211) against disease complex caused by Meloidogyne incognita and Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. vasinfectum in okra

M. S. Rao; M Kusum Dwivedi; R Manoj Kumar; et al.

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field studies were conducted at two different agro-climatic regions of India to assess the bio-efficacy of liquid and talc formulations of Bacillus subtilis (Cohn 1872), 1% W.P. for the management of Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid & White, 1919) Chitw, 1949 and Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. vasinfectum on okra (Abelmoschus esculentus Moench.). Results clearly indicated the potential of this bio-pesticide in the management of M. incognita and F. oxysporum f.sp. vasinfectum on okra. B. subtilis was enriched in farm yard manure (FYM) and applied at different doses in the experimental plots. Seed treatment with 20g or 20ml of B. subtilis/kg and application of five tons of FYM enriched with 5kg or 5 lit B. subtilis/ha proved to be significantly effective in reducing the population of M. incognita and bringing down the disease incidence of F. oxysporum f.sp. vasinfectum. These treatments also increased the yield of okra in the two agro-climatic regions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis seed treatment and enriched manure significantly reduced M. incognita populations.

Treatment
Seed treatment with 20g or 20ml of B. subtilis/kg and application of five tons of FYM enriched with 5kg or 5 lit B. subtilis/hae0
Outcome
population of M. incognitae0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed treatment with 20g or 20ml of B. subtilis/kg and application of five tons of FYM enriched with 5kg or 5 lit B. subtilis/ha proved to be significantly effective in reducing the population of M. incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–796 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 166–170 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The Bacillus treatments reduced Fusarium disease incidence.

Treatment
Seed treatment with 20g or 20ml of B. subtilis/kg and application of five tons of FYM enriched with 5kg or 5 lit B. subtilis/hae0
Outcome
disease incidence of F. oxysporum f.sp. vasinfectume0
Direction
bringing downe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed treatment with 20g or 20ml of B. subtilis/kg and application of five tons of FYM enriched with 5kg or 5 lit B. subtilis/ha proved to be significantly effective in reducing the population of M. incognita and bringing down the disease incidence of F. oxysporum f.sp. vasinfectum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–870 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 166–170 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatments increased okra yield in both regions.

Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These treatments also increased the yield of okra in the two agro-climatic regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–954 · show in text ↑

Bacillus subtilis · disease · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

seed treatment · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fertilization · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 13 positive, 7 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

seed treatment · disease · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fertilization · disease · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.