Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The Bacillus treatments reduced Fusarium disease incidence.

A claim from Evaluation of bio-efficacy of Bacillus subtilis (NBAIMCC-B-01211) against disease complex caused by Meloidogyne incognita and Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. vasinfectum in okra · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The Bacillus treatments reduced Fusarium disease incidence.

Treatment
Seed treatment with 20g or 20ml of B. subtilis/kg and application of five tons of FYM enriched with 5kg or 5 lit B. subtilis/hae0
Outcome
disease incidence of F. oxysporum f.sp. vasinfectume0
Direction
bringing downe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed treatment with 20g or 20ml of B. subtilis/kg and application of five tons of FYM enriched with 5kg or 5 lit B. subtilis/ha proved to be significantly effective in reducing the population of M. incognita and bringing down the disease incidence of F. oxysporum f.sp. vasinfectum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–870
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 166–170

Title

Evaluation of bio-efficacy of Bacillus subtilis (NBAIMCC-B-01211) against disease complex caused by Meloidogyne incognita and Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. vasinfectum in okra

M. S. Rao; M Kusum Dwivedi; R Manoj Kumar; et al. Pest Management in Horticultural Ecosystems 2014

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-e5a5f0fe4068c368b9b31428d836a5dafa5839cda11a295a8dcbbebb85b11ac1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

Bacillus subtilis · disease · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

seed treatment · disease · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

fertilization · disease · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.