Paper · 2024 · Asian Journal of Advances in Agricultural Research

Prevalence of Disease Incidence and Mycoflora of Rhizosphere at Distinct Phenological Stages in Different Treatments of Okra in Hamelmalo, Eritrea

Luwam Berhane; Idris Abubaker; Yordanos Ghebrehiwet; et al.

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Okra (Abelmoschus esculents L. Moench.) is a vegetable widely grown in Eritrea and cultivated in 514 ha of land with an average yield of 10t/ha. However, the production of this crop is highly affected by nematodes and other diseases. There is very less information on disease occurrence and soil mycoflora, hence, this research was carried out in the field of okra, in Hamelmalo Agricultural College, to identify the occurrence of diseases; percentage occurrence of disease incidence and identification of field mycoflora at various phenological stages of okra in various treatments such as control (T1), farm yard manure (T2), intercropping with a legume (T3) and chemical fertilizer (T4). This experiment was conducted in a completely randomized block design. During the experiment, powdery mildew and blight were the main diseases that occurred, and diseases like damping off, wilt, and leaf spot were also observed. In addition to that various soil mycoflora were found including, two nematode predacious fungi Arthrobotris oligospora and Drechmeria sps. which were identified for the first time in the rhizosphere soils of okra, in Eritrea. The study revealed that the flowering stage was found significantly different at the incidence of powdery mildew but all growth stages of okra were non-significant at blights. Chemical fertilizer was found to be the best in cases of disease prevalence and intercropping was in cases of pests’ infestation. Based on the results of the current study it can be concluded that different phenological stages were found to be significantly influenced by all the treatments. But in T3 the cultivation which was with cowpea attracted the insect pests like African bollworms. However, the incidence of blight on all the treatments at different phonological stages was non-significant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Powdery mildew and blight were the main okra diseases observed.

Outcome
powdery mildew and blight were the main diseasese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“powdery mildew and blight were the main diseases that occurred”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–847 · show in text ↑
e1

“Okra (Abelmoschus esculents L. Moench.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Damping off, wilt and leaf spot were also observed in okra.

Outcome
damping off, wilt, and leaf spote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“damping off, wilt, and leaf spot were also observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–918 · show in text ↑
e1

“Okra (Abelmoschus esculents L. Moench.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arthrobotris oligospora was identified in okra rhizosphere soils in Eritrea for the first time.

Interactor
Arthrobotris oligosporae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Arthrobotris oligosporae0
Setting
Eritreae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Arthrobotris oligospora and Drechmeria sps. which were identified for the first time in the rhizosphere soils of okra, in Eritrea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1144 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drechmeria sps. was identified in okra rhizosphere soils in Eritrea for the first time.

Interactor
Drechmeria sps.e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Drechmeria sps.e0
Setting
Eritreae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Arthrobotris oligospora and Drechmeria sps. which were identified for the first time in the rhizosphere soils of okra, in Eritrea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1144 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Powdery mildew incidence differed significantly at flowering.

Organ / stage
flowering stagee0
Outcome
incidence of powdery mildewe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“flowering stage was found significantly different at the incidence of powdery mildew”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1258 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth stages of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1288 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Blight incidence did not differ significantly across okra growth stages.

Organ / stage
growth stagese0
Outcome
blightse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all growth stages of okra were non-significant at blights”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1320 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical fertilizer was judged best for disease prevalence.

Treatment
Chemical fertilizere0
Outcome
disease prevalencee0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chemical fertilizer was found to be the best in cases of disease prevalence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1397 · show in text ↑
e1

“field of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–364 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping was judged best for pest infestation.

Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
pests’ infestatione0
Direction
beste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping was in cases of pests’ infestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1450 · show in text ↑
e1

“field of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–364 · show in text ↑
e2

“Chemical fertilizer was found to be the best in cases of disease prevalence and intercropping was in cases of pests’ infestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1450 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments significantly influenced okra phenological stages.

Treatment
all the treatmentse0
Outcome
different phenological stagese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different phenological stages were found to be significantly influenced by all the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1519–1612 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth stages of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1288 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea intercropping attracted African bollworms.

Treatment
with cowpeae0
Interactor
African bollwormse0pest
Outcome
attracted the insect pests like African bollwormse0
Direction
attractede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in T3 the cultivation which was with cowpea attracted the insect pests like African bollworms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1618–1711 · show in text ↑
e1

“field of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–364 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Blight incidence did not differ significantly among treatments and phenological stages.

Treatment
all the treatmentse0
Outcome
incidence of blighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“incidence of blight on all the treatments at different phonological stages was non-significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1726–1820 · show in text ↑
e1

“field of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–364 · show in text ↑

Vigna unguiculata · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

intercropping · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

fertilization · disease · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.