Paper · 2013 · Indian journal of plant protection

Insecticides and Bioproducts against Whitefly Population and Incidence of Yellow vein mosaic virus in Okra

Prashant P. Jambhulkar; Virendra Singh; S. Babu; et al.

6
claims
16
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Synthetic chemicals and bioproducts were evaluated against white fly (Bemisia tabaci), the insect vector of Bhindi yellow vein mosaic disease. Among the chemicals, seed treatment and two sprays with imidacloprid was found most effective in reducing disease incidence by 70. 9% in 2010 and 67.9% in 2011 experiments. This treatment also reduced whitefly population by 92.9% over control. Among the bioproducts, spray of Azadirachtin at 15 days interval was the most effective in reducing disease incidence by 53 to 58% and whitefly population by 79.2%. Association of whitefly population with disease incidence indicated that 25 to 50 days after sowing was the most vulnerable stage to be attacked by virus infested whitefly vector to cause disease.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid seed treatment and two sprays reduced disease incidence by 70. 9% in 2010.

Treatment
seed treatment and two sprays with imidaclopride0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
70. 9%e0
Qualifier
2010e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“seed treatment and two sprays with imidacloprid was found most effective in reducing disease incidence by 70. 9% in 2010 and 67.9% in 2011 experiments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–315 · show in text ↑
e1

“the insect vector of Bhindi yellow vein mosaic disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid seed treatment and two sprays reduced disease incidence by 67.9% in 2011.

Treatment
seed treatment and two sprays with imidaclopride0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
67.9%e0
Qualifier
2011e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“seed treatment and two sprays with imidacloprid was found most effective in reducing disease incidence by 70. 9% in 2010 and 67.9% in 2011 experiments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–315 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

That imidacloprid treatment reduced whitefly population by 92.9% over control.

Treatment
seed treatment and two sprays with imidaclopride0
Interactor
Bemisia tabaciBemisia tabacie2pest
Outcome
whitefly populatione1
Direction
reducede1
Value
92.9%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bemisia tabaci
Bemisia tabaci · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“seed treatment and two sprays with imidacloprid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–211 · show in text ↑
e1

“This treatment also reduced whitefly population by 92.9% over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–386 · show in text ↑
e2

“white fly (Bemisia tabaci)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azadirachtin sprays at 15 day intervals reduced disease incidence by 53 to 58%.

Treatment
spray of Azadirachtin at 15 days intervale0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
53 to 58%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“spray of Azadirachtin at 15 days interval was the most effective in reducing disease incidence by 53 to 58% and whitefly population by 79.2%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–551 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azadirachtin sprays at 15 day intervals reduced whitefly population by 79.2%.

Treatment
spray of Azadirachtin at 15 days intervale1
Interactor
Bemisia tabaciBemisia tabacie0pest
Outcome
whitefly populatione1
Direction
reducinge1
Value
79.2%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bemisia tabaci
Bemisia tabaci · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“white fly (Bemisia tabaci)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“spray of Azadirachtin at 15 days interval was the most effective in reducing disease incidence by 53 to 58% and whitefly population by 79.2%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–551 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whitefly population was associated with disease incidence, with 25 to 50 days after sowing identified as the most vulnerable period.

Organ / stage
25 to 50 days after sowinge0
Interactor
whiteflye0pest
Outcome
disease incidencee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“Association of whitefly population with disease incidence indicated that 25 to 50 days after sowing was the most vulnerable stage to be attacked by virus infested whitefly vector to cause disease.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–748 · show in text ↑

azadirachtin · disease · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

imidacloprid · disease · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

imidacloprid · Bemisia tabaci · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

application · disease · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

application · Bemisia tabaci · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

seed treatment · Bemisia tabaci · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

seed treatment · disease · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.