Paper · 2022 · Journal of Agriculture and Food Research

Interacting effects of botanicals, biocontrol agents, and potting media on Rhizoctonia solani led damping-off of okra seedlings

Anugya Bhattarai; Amrit Sharma; Ritesh Kumar Yadav; et al.

12
claims
12
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

The interacting effects of botanicals, biocontrol agents, and potting media against the Rhizoctonia solani led damping-off in okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) were investigated. The treatments comprised of different combinations of extracts of five botanicals: wood apple/Indian bael – Aegle marmelos L., Neem – Azadirachta indica A. Juss, Turmeric – Curcuma longa L., Ginger – Zingiber officinale Roscoe, and Onion – Allium cepa L., and two biocontrol agents, Pseudomonas fluorescens and Trichoderma viride as first factors and two potting media; vermicompost with soil and farm yard manure with soil as the second factor in a completely randomized design with 42 treatments and 4 replications. The seeds were sown after pathogen inoculation. Okra seedling health was recorded daily for the first 16 days after sowing. Pseudomonas soil treatment and Pseudomonas + onion seed treatment showed the least pre-emergence damping off (35%). Almost all the combinations of wood apple extracts showed inhibitory effects on seed germination and growth of seedlings. The greatest number of days for the onset of post-emergence damping-off was recorded with Pseudomonas + Onion seed treatment (14.88 days) followed by Pseudomonas seed treatment (14.13 days). Germination Index (GI) was better for farm yard manure (0.32) than Vermicompost substrates (0.23). The GI was greatest in Pseudomonas soil treatment (0.53) followed by Pseudomonas + Onion seed treatment (0.51). Similarly, Dickson Quality Index (DQI) was greatest for Pseudomonas + Neem seed treatment (0.0015), with a greater value of DQI indicating better seedling quality. No significant interaction was observed between the substrates and biocontrol agents for any studied parameters. Pseudomonas + Onion seed treatment and Pseudomonas soil treatment were most effective for controlling R. solani-led damping-off in okra.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas soil treatment had the least pre-emergence damping off at 35%.

Treatment
Pseudomonas soil treatmente0
Interactor
PseudomonasPseudomonase0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
pre-emergence damping offe0
Direction
leaste0
Value
35%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pseudomonas soil treatment and Pseudomonas + onion seed treatment showed the least pre-emergence damping off (35%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–935 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas plus onion seed treatment had the least pre-emergence damping off at 35%.

Treatment
Pseudomonas + onion seed treatmente0
Interactor
PseudomonasPseudomonase0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
pre-emergence damping offe0
Direction
leaste0
Value
35%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pseudomonas soil treatment and Pseudomonas + onion seed treatment showed the least pre-emergence damping off (35%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–935 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Almost all wood apple extract combinations inhibited seed germination and seedling growth.

Treatment
wood apple extractse0
Outcome
seed germination and growth of seedlingse0
Direction
inhibitorye0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Almost all the combinations of wood apple extracts showed inhibitory effects on seed germination and growth of seedlings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1057 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas plus onion seed treatment gave the longest delay to post-emergence damping-off onset, 14.88 days.

Treatment
Pseudomonas + Onion seed treatmente0
Interactor
PseudomonasPseudomonase0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
number of days for the onset of post-emergence damping-offe0
Direction
greateste0
Value
14.88 dayse0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest number of days for the onset of post-emergence damping-off was recorded with Pseudomonas + Onion seed treatment (14.88 days) followed by Pseudomonas seed treatment (14.13 days).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas seed treatment delayed post-emergence damping-off onset to 14.13 days.

Treatment
Pseudomonas seed treatmente0
Interactor
PseudomonasPseudomonase0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
number of days for the onset of post-emergence damping-offe0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
14.13 dayse0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest number of days for the onset of post-emergence damping-off was recorded with Pseudomonas + Onion seed treatment (14.88 days) followed by Pseudomonas seed treatment (14.13 days).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farm yard manure gave a higher germination index, 0.32, than vermicompost at 0.23.

Treatment
farm yard manuree0
Outcome
Germination Indexe0
Direction
bettere0
Value
0.32e0
Qualifier
0.23e0
Comparator
Vermicompost substratese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Germination Index (GI) was better for farm yard manure (0.32) than Vermicompost substrates (0.23).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1347 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas soil treatment gave the greatest germination index, 0.53.

Treatment
Pseudomonas soil treatmente0
Interactor
PseudomonasPseudomonase0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
GIe0
Direction
greateste0
Value
0.53e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The GI was greatest in Pseudomonas soil treatment (0.53) followed by Pseudomonas + Onion seed treatment (0.51).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1348–1459 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas plus onion seed treatment gave a germination index of 0.51.

Treatment
Pseudomonas + Onion seed treatmente0
Interactor
PseudomonasPseudomonase0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
GIe0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
0.51e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The GI was greatest in Pseudomonas soil treatment (0.53) followed by Pseudomonas + Onion seed treatment (0.51).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1348–1459 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas plus Neem seed treatment gave the greatest Dickson Quality Index, 0.0015.

Treatment
Pseudomonas + Neem seed treatmente0
Interactor
PseudomonasPseudomonase0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Dickson Quality Indexe0
Direction
greateste0
Value
0.0015e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dickson Quality Index (DQI) was greatest for Pseudomonas + Neem seed treatment (0.0015), with a greater value of DQI indicating better seedling quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1471–1623 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Substrate and biocontrol agent interactions were not significant for any studied parameter.

Treatment
biocontrol agentse0
Outcome
interactione0
Direction
No significante0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“No significant interaction was observed between the substrates and biocontrol agents for any studied parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1624–1736 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identified Pseudomonas plus onion seed treatment as among the most effective controls for damping-off.

Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
Pseudomonas + Onion seed treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pseudomonas + Onion seed treatment and Pseudomonas soil treatment were most effective for controlling R. solani-led damping-off in okra.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1737–1873 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identified Pseudomonas soil treatment as among the most effective controls for damping-off.

Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
Pseudomonas soil treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pseudomonas + Onion seed treatment and Pseudomonas soil treatment were most effective for controlling R. solani-led damping-off in okra.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1737–1873 · show in text ↑

Allium cepa · disease · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Pseudomonas · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

botanical · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 49 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

59 papers: 53 positive, 6 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

fertilization · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

207 papers: 190 positive, 17 negative or no effect

189 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

203 papers more in this group

See all 207 papers →

seed treatment · quality: general · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

seed treatment · disease · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.