Abstract
Investigations were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of two nematophagous fungi, Arthrobotrys oligospora and Paecilomyces lilacinus against root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) infecting okra. A. oligospora alone and in combination with P. lilacinus suppressed root galling and nematode population to a significant level, thereby improving plant growth parameters. P. lilacinus, alone failed to reduce root galling. There were no significant difference in time of applications.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
A. oligospora alone significantly suppressed okra root galling.
- Taxon
- okra
.jpg?width=60)
Abelmoschus esculentuse1 - Treatment
- A. oligospora alonee0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognita
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=60)
Meloidogyne incognitae1pathogen - Second interactor
- A. oligosporae0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- root gallinge0
- Direction
- suppressede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“A. oligospora alone and in combination with P. lilacinus suppressed root galling and nematode population to a significant level, thereby improving plant growth parameters.”
e1“root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) infecting okra.”
Claim · model-written summary
A. oligospora alone significantly suppressed the okra nematode population.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse1
- Treatment
- A. oligospora alonee0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
- Second interactor
- A. oligosporae0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- nematode populatione0
- Direction
- suppressede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A. oligospora alone and in combination with P. lilacinus suppressed root galling and nematode population to a significant level, thereby improving plant growth parameters.”
e1“root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) infecting okra.”
Claim · model-written summary
A. oligospora alone improved okra growth parameters.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse1
- Treatment
- A. oligospora alonee0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
- Second interactor
- A. oligosporae0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- plant growth parameterse0
- Direction
- improvinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A. oligospora alone and in combination with P. lilacinus suppressed root galling and nematode population to a significant level, thereby improving plant growth parameters.”
e1“root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) infecting okra.”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined A. oligospora and P. lilacinus significantly suppressed okra root galling and nematode population.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse1
- Treatment
- A. oligospora alone and in combination with P. lilacinuse0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
- Second interactor
- P. lilacinus
Purpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- root galling and nematode populatione0
- Direction
- suppressede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A. oligospora alone and in combination with P. lilacinus suppressed root galling and nematode population to a significant level, thereby improving plant growth parameters.”
e1“root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) infecting okra.”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined fungal treatment improved okra growth parameters.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse1
- Treatment
- in combination with P. lilacinuse0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
- Second interactor
- P. lilacinusPurpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- plant growth parameterse0
- Direction
- improvinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A. oligospora alone and in combination with P. lilacinus suppressed root galling and nematode population to a significant level, thereby improving plant growth parameters.”
e1“root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) infecting okra.”
Claim · model-written summary
P. lilacinus alone failed to reduce root galling.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- P. lilacinuse0
- Interactor
- P. lilacinusPurpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- root gallinge0
- Direction
- failed to reducee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“P. lilacinus, alone failed to reduce root galling.”
t0“okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Application timing did not differ significantly.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Outcome
- time of applicationse0
- Direction
- no significant differencee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There were no significant difference in time of applications.”
t0“okra”
The same questions in other papers
Purpureocillium lilacinum · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
Purpureocillium lilacinum · Meloidogyne incognita · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
12 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.