Abstract
Seed dressing with culture filtrate of Paecilomyces lilacinus resulted in a significant control of root-knot nematodes, Meloidogyne incognita and reniform nematode, Rotylenchulus reniformis singly or concomitantly, with a corresponding increase in plant growth, length and weight of plants and number of pods, chlorophyll content of leaves, water absorption capacity of roots of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus). In another experiment soil application with oil cake of neem (Azadirachta indica) showed significant suppression of the nematodes, both singly as well as concomitantly, with the consequent improvement in different growth parameters of the plants as above. A combination of seed dressing treatment with culture filtrate of P. lilacinus and soil amendment with neem cake gave synergistic effect with respect to nematode management and improvement in plant growth parameters.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Paecilomyces filtrate significantly controlled Meloidogyne incognita on okra.
- Taxon
- okra
.jpg?width=60)
Abelmoschus esculentuse1 - Treatment
- Seed dressing with culture filtrate of Paecilomyces lilacinuse0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognita
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=60)
Meloidogyne incognitae0pest - Second interactor
- Paecilomyces lilacinus
Purpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- control of root-knot nematodes, Meloidogyne incognitae0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Seed dressing with culture filtrate of Paecilomyces lilacinus resulted in a significant control of root-knot nematodes, Meloidogyne incognita”
e1“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”
Claim · model-written summary
Paecilomyces filtrate significantly controlled Rotylenchulus reniformis on okra.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse1
- Treatment
- Seed dressing with culture filtrate of Paecilomyces lilacinuse0
- Interactor
- Rotylenchulus reniformis
Rotylenchulus reniformise0pest - Second interactor
- Paecilomyces lilacinusPurpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- reniform nematode, Rotylenchulus reniformise0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Seed dressing with culture filtrate of Paecilomyces lilacinus resulted in a significant control of root-knot nematodes, Meloidogyne incognita and reniform nematode, Rotylenchulus reniformis”
e1“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”
Claim · model-written summary
Paecilomyces filtrate increased okra growth, pod number, chlorophyll and root water absorption.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse0
- Treatment
- Seed dressing with culture filtrate of Paecilomyces lilacinuse1
- Interactor
- Paecilomyces lilacinusPurpureocillium lilacinume1biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- plant growth, length and weight of plants and number of podse0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“with a corresponding increase in plant growth, length and weight of plants and number of pods, chlorophyll content of leaves, water absorption capacity of roots of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”
e1“Seed dressing with culture filtrate of Paecilomyces lilacinus”
Claim · model-written summary
Neem oil cake significantly suppressed nematodes on okra.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse1
- Treatment
- soil application with oil cake of neem (Azadirachta indica)e0
- Outcome
- suppression of the nematodese0
- Direction
- suppressione0
Not reportedInteractorComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“soil application with oil cake of neem (Azadirachta indica) showed significant suppression of the nematodes”
e1“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”
Claim · model-written summary
Neem oil cake improved okra growth parameters.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse2
- Treatment
- soil application with oil cake of neem (Azadirachta indica)e1
- Outcome
- growth parameterse0
- Direction
- improvemente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“with the consequent improvement in different growth parameters of the plants as above”
e1“soil application with oil cake of neem (Azadirachta indica)”
e2“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined fungal filtrate and neem cake had a synergistic nematode management effect.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse1
- Treatment
- A combination of seed dressing treatment with culture filtrate of P. lilacinus and soil amendment with neem cakee0
- Interactor
- P. lilacinusPurpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- nematode managemente0
- Direction
- synergistice0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A combination of seed dressing treatment with culture filtrate of P. lilacinus and soil amendment with neem cake gave synergistic effect with respect to nematode management”
e1“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined fungal filtrate and neem cake had a synergistic effect on okra growth.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse1
- Treatment
- A combination of seed dressing treatment with culture filtrate of P. lilacinus and soil amendment with neem cakee0
- Interactor
- P. lilacinusPurpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- plant growth parameterse0
- Direction
- improvemente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A combination of seed dressing treatment with culture filtrate of P. lilacinus and soil amendment with neem cake gave synergistic effect with respect to nematode management and improvement in plant growth parameters”
e1“okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”
The same questions in other papers
Azadirachta indica · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Azadirachta indica · control · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Purpureocillium lilacinum · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Purpureocillium lilacinum · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Purpureocillium lilacinum · Meloidogyne incognita · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
12 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →botanical · control · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →seed treatment · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
24 papers more in this group
See all 28 papers →other · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
28 papers more in this group
See all 32 papers →8 of 14 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.