Paper · 2000 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Evaluation of Tank Mixture of Acetachlor and Atrazine or 2,4-D Na against Weeds in Pearl Millet (Pennisetum americanum L.)

R. S. Banga; Ashok Yadav; R. K. Malik; et al.

10
claims
14
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To evaluate the performance of acetachlor, atrazine and 2, 4-D Na alone or as tank mixture, an experiment was conducted during kharif seasons of 1999 and 2000 at Research Farm of CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India. Among 17 weed control treatments, atrazine at 0.50 kg/ha applied as pre-emergence (PE) or 10 days after sowing (DAS), acetachlor+atrazine at 0.750+0.375 kg/ha at 10 DAS proved highly effective (>90%) against Trianthema portulacastrum and Echinochloa colona in pearl millet and consequently yielded similar to mechanical weeded (20 and 35 DAS) and weed free plots during both the years. Acetachlor alone or in combination with atrazine or 2, 4-D Na as pre-emergence (PE) resulted in severe phytotoxicity to pearl millet (92–98% in 1999 and 50–54% in 2000); however, it also provided effective control of both the weeds (85–98%). Acetachlor applied as post-emergence (10 and 15 DAS) was ineffective against weeds in this crop. Post-emergence application of 2, 4-D Na at 0.50 kg/ha resulted in marginal growth suppression of T. portulacastrum only.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-emergence atrazine at 0.50 kg/ha controlled both named weeds by over 90%.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
atrazine at 0.50 kg/ha applied as pre-emergence (PE)e0
Interactor
Trianthema portulacastrumTrianthema portulacastrume0weed
Second interactor
Echinochloa colonaEchinochloa colonae0weed
Outcome
effective (>90%) against Trianthema portulacastrum and Echinochloa colonae0
Direction
highly effectivee0
Value
>90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trianthema portulacastrum
Trianthema portulacastrum · InteractorGraham Racher · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Echinochloa colona
Echinochloa colona · Second interactorTauʻolunga · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“atrazine at 0.50 kg/ha applied as pre-emergence (PE) or 10 days after sowing (DAS), acetachlor+atrazine at 0.750+0.375 kg/ha at 10 DAS proved highly effective (>90%) against Trianthema portulacastrum and Echinochloa colona in pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–502 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine at 10 days after sowing controlled the two weeds by over 90%.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
atrazine at 0.50 kg/ha applied as pre-emergence (PE) or 10 days after sowing (DAS)e0
Interactor
Trianthema portulacastrumTrianthema portulacastrume0weed
Second interactor
Echinochloa colonaEchinochloa colonae0weed
Outcome
effective (>90%) against Trianthema portulacastrum and Echinochloa colonae0
Direction
highly effectivee0
Value
>90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trianthema portulacastrum
Trianthema portulacastrum · InteractorGraham Racher · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Echinochloa colona
Echinochloa colona · Second interactorTauʻolunga · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“atrazine at 0.50 kg/ha applied as pre-emergence (PE) or 10 days after sowing (DAS), acetachlor+atrazine at 0.750+0.375 kg/ha at 10 DAS proved highly effective (>90%) against Trianthema portulacastrum and Echinochloa colona in pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–502 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetachlor plus atrazine at 10 days after sowing controlled the two weeds by over 90%.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
acetachlor+atrazine at 0.750+0.375 kg/ha at 10 DASe0
Interactor
Trianthema portulacastrumTrianthema portulacastrume0weed
Second interactor
Echinochloa colonaEchinochloa colonae0weed
Outcome
effective (>90%) against Trianthema portulacastrum and Echinochloa colonae0
Direction
highly effectivee0
Value
>90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trianthema portulacastrum
Trianthema portulacastrum · InteractorGraham Racher · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Echinochloa colona
Echinochloa colona · Second interactorTauʻolunga · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“acetachlor+atrazine at 0.750+0.375 kg/ha at 10 DAS proved highly effective (>90%) against Trianthema portulacastrum and Echinochloa colona in pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–502 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effective treatments yielded similarly to mechanical weeding and weed-free plots.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Outcome
yielded similare0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
mechanical weeded (20 and 35 DAS) and weed free plotse0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“consequently yielded similar to mechanical weeded (20 and 35 DAS) and weed free plots during both the years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–615 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-emergence acetachlor caused severe pearl millet phytotoxicity.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
Acetachlor alonee0
Outcome
phytotoxicity to pearl millete0
Direction
severee0
Value
92–98%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Acetachlor alone or in combination with atrazine or 2, 4-D Na as pre-emergence (PE) resulted in severe phytotoxicity to pearl millet (92–98% in 1999 and 50–54% in 2000)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-emergence acetachlor with atrazine caused severe pearl millet phytotoxicity.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
Acetachlor alone or in combination with atrazinee0
Outcome
phytotoxicity to pearl millete0
Direction
severee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Acetachlor alone or in combination with atrazine or 2, 4-D Na as pre-emergence (PE) resulted in severe phytotoxicity to pearl millet (92–98% in 1999 and 50–54% in 2000)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-emergence acetachlor with 2, 4-D Na caused severe pearl millet phytotoxicity.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse0
Treatment
Acetachlor alone or in combination with atrazine or 2, 4-D Nae0
Outcome
phytotoxicity to pearl millete0
Direction
severee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Acetachlor alone or in combination with atrazine or 2, 4-D Na as pre-emergence (PE) resulted in severe phytotoxicity to pearl millet (92–98% in 1999 and 50–54% in 2000)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-emergence acetachlor treatments controlled both weeds by 85–98%.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
Acetachlort0
Outcome
control of both the weedse0
Direction
effectivee0
Value
85–98%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it also provided effective control of both the weeds (85–98%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–856 · show in text ↑
t0

“Acetachlor and Atrazine or 2,4-D Na against Weeds in Pearl Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-emergence acetachlor was ineffective against pearl millet weeds.

Taxon
Pearl MilletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
Acetachlor applied as post-emergence (10 and 15 DAS)e0
Outcome
weeds in this crope0
Direction
ineffectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Acetachlor applied as post-emergence (10 and 15 DAS) was ineffective against weeds in this crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–954 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-emergence 2, 4-D Na marginally suppressed T. portulacastrum growth.

Taxon
Pearl MilletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
Post-emergence application of 2, 4-D Na at 0.50 kg/hae0
Interactor
T. portulacastrumTrianthema portulacastrume0weed
Outcome
growth suppression of T. portulacastrume0
Direction
suppressione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trianthema portulacastrum
Trianthema portulacastrum · InteractorGraham Racher · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Post-emergence application of 2, 4-D Na at 0.50 kg/ha resulted in marginal growth suppression of T. portulacastrum only.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1075 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pearl Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–95 · show in text ↑

atrazine · crop injury · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

atrazine · Trianthema portulacastrum · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

herbicide · weed · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 21 positive, 1 negative or no effect

21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

herbicide · Trianthema portulacastrum · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.