Paper · 2012 · Soil in the Environment

Growth and yield of Kinnow (Citrus reticulata Blanco) and soil physical properties as affected by orchard floor management practices in Punjab, Pakistan.

Hafeez-ur-Rahman; Ghulam Nabi; Ijaz Ali; et al.

9
claims
25
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Improvement of soil physical properties through orchard floor management is a desired option because it results in improved yields, better nutrients and water use efficiency and reduced runoff. Studies were carried out to determine effect of weed management practices on growth, fruit production and changes in soil physico-chemical parameters in a citrus orchard. Studies comprised of two orchard floor management practices i.e. cultivation and mowing. In cultivation, weeds emerging in the orchard were controlled by cultivation/ploughing to keep their growth at minimal, while in mowing, weeds were cut at about 5 cm height to keep their growth under check and the cut weeds to act as mulch. After 8 years of continuous practice, determinations were made to compare effectiveness of the management practices in terms of plant growth and yield, changes in soil physico-chemical and water retention characteristics. The data indicated that all the growth parameters responded significantly to management practices. Similarly, soil physico-chemical parameters were also affected. Shoot growth, canopy diameter, Trunk Cross-sectional Area (TCSA) and fruit yield were increased. Soil bulk density was decreased and consequently soil porosity was increased. Mowing promoted accumulation of soil organic matter and soil aggregation. The increased water retention in soil profile and enhanced saturated hydraulic conductivity were attributed to conditions conducive to organic matter accumulation in the soil profile. The results indicated superiority of mowing practice over conventional cultivation towards plant growth, yield and improvement in soil physical properties.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All growth parameters of the citrus trees responded significantly to the orchard floor management practices.

Taxon
Citrus reticulataCitrus reticulatat0
Outcome
growth parameterse0
Qualifier
responded significantly to management practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus reticulata
Citrus reticulata · TaxonJoe Ravi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Kinnow (Citrus reticulata Blanco)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“The data indicated that all the growth parameters responded significantly to management practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1014 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mowing increased shoot growth, canopy diameter and trunk cross-sectional area of citrus compared with cultivation.

Taxon
Citrus reticulataCitrus reticulatat0
Treatment
mowinge5
Outcome
Shoot growth, canopy diameter, Trunk Cross-sectional Area (TCSA)e1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
conventional cultivatione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus reticulata
Citrus reticulata · TaxonJoe Ravi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Kinnow (Citrus reticulata Blanco)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–53 · show in text ↑
e1

“Shoot growth, canopy diameter, Trunk Cross-sectional Area (TCSA) and fruit yield were increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1175 · show in text ↑
e5

“The results indicated superiority of mowing practice over conventional cultivation towards plant growth, yield and improvement in soil physical properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1513–1667 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mowing increased fruit yield of citrus compared with cultivation.

Taxon
Citrus reticulataCitrus reticulatat0
Treatment
mowinge5
Outcome
fruit yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
conventional cultivatione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus reticulata
Citrus reticulata · TaxonJoe Ravi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Kinnow (Citrus reticulata Blanco)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–53 · show in text ↑
e1

“Shoot growth, canopy diameter, Trunk Cross-sectional Area (TCSA) and fruit yield were increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1175 · show in text ↑
e5

“The results indicated superiority of mowing practice over conventional cultivation towards plant growth, yield and improvement in soil physical properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1513–1667 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mowing decreased soil bulk density compared with cultivation.

Taxon
Citrus reticulataCitrus reticulatat0
Treatment
mowinge5
Outcome
Soil bulk densitye2
Direction
decreasede2
Comparator
conventional cultivatione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus reticulata
Citrus reticulata · TaxonJoe Ravi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Kinnow (Citrus reticulata Blanco)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–53 · show in text ↑
e2

“Soil bulk density was decreased and consequently soil porosity was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1253 · show in text ↑
e5

“The results indicated superiority of mowing practice over conventional cultivation towards plant growth, yield and improvement in soil physical properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1513–1667 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mowing increased soil porosity compared with cultivation.

Taxon
Citrus reticulataCitrus reticulatat0
Treatment
mowinge5
Outcome
soil porositye2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
conventional cultivatione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus reticulata
Citrus reticulata · TaxonJoe Ravi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Kinnow (Citrus reticulata Blanco)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–53 · show in text ↑
e2

“Soil bulk density was decreased and consequently soil porosity was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1253 · show in text ↑
e5

“The results indicated superiority of mowing practice over conventional cultivation towards plant growth, yield and improvement in soil physical properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1513–1667 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mowing promoted accumulation of soil organic matter and soil aggregation compared with cultivation.

Taxon
Citrus reticulataCitrus reticulatat0
Treatment
Mowinge3
Outcome
accumulation of soil organic matter and soil aggregatione3
Direction
promotede3
Comparator
conventional cultivatione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus reticulata
Citrus reticulata · TaxonJoe Ravi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Kinnow (Citrus reticulata Blanco)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–53 · show in text ↑
e3

“Mowing promoted accumulation of soil organic matter and soil aggregation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1327 · show in text ↑
e5

“The results indicated superiority of mowing practice over conventional cultivation towards plant growth, yield and improvement in soil physical properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1513–1667 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mowing increased water retention in the soil profile compared with cultivation.

Taxon
Citrus reticulataCitrus reticulatat0
Treatment
mowinge5
Outcome
water retention in soil profilee4
Direction
increasede4
Comparator
conventional cultivatione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus reticulata
Citrus reticulata · TaxonJoe Ravi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Kinnow (Citrus reticulata Blanco)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–53 · show in text ↑
e4

“The increased water retention in soil profile and enhanced saturated hydraulic conductivity were attributed to conditions conducive to organic matter accumulation in the soil profile”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1511 · show in text ↑
e5

“The results indicated superiority of mowing practice over conventional cultivation towards plant growth, yield and improvement in soil physical properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1513–1667 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The increased water retention and enhanced saturated hydraulic conductivity were attributed to conditions conducive to organic matter accumulation in the soil profile.

Taxon
Citrus reticulataCitrus reticulatat0
Outcome
water retention in soil profile and enhanced saturated hydraulic conductivitye4
Qualifier
conditions conducive to organic matter accumulation in the soil profilee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus reticulata
Citrus reticulata · TaxonJoe Ravi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Kinnow (Citrus reticulata Blanco)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–53 · show in text ↑
e4

“The increased water retention in soil profile and enhanced saturated hydraulic conductivity were attributed to conditions conducive to organic matter accumulation in the soil profile”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1511 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mowing enhanced saturated hydraulic conductivity compared with cultivation.

Taxon
Citrus reticulataCitrus reticulatat0
Treatment
mowinge5
Outcome
saturated hydraulic conductivitye4
Direction
enhancede4
Comparator
conventional cultivatione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus reticulata
Citrus reticulata · TaxonJoe Ravi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Kinnow (Citrus reticulata Blanco)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–53 · show in text ↑
e4

“The increased water retention in soil profile and enhanced saturated hydraulic conductivity were attributed to conditions conducive to organic matter accumulation in the soil profile”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1511 · show in text ↑
e5

“The results indicated superiority of mowing practice over conventional cultivation towards plant growth, yield and improvement in soil physical properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1513–1667 · show in text ↑

pruning · soil: physics · Citrus reticulata (tangerine)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

pruning · soil: chemistry · Citrus reticulata (tangerine)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

pruning · growth · Citrus reticulata (tangerine)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

pruning · yield · Citrus reticulata (tangerine)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.