Abstract
Efficacy of strobilurin fungicides, viz. kresoxim-methyl, (Stroby 50 WG, 0.1%), trifloxystrobin (Flint 50 WG, 0.1%) and azoxystrobin (Amistar 250g/L, 0.1%) and two systemic acquired resistance (SAR) compounds, viz., benzothiadiazole, (BTH, as Bion 50 WG, 0.01%), and salicylic acid (SA, 0.005%) was tested against Botrytis blight of gladiolus. None of the compounds reduced floral infection in a significant manner over the control. However, the efficacy of strobilurins against foliage infection was remarkable. Two strobilurins, viz. Stroby and Flint reduced foliar infection in a highly significant manner over the control. These fungicides registered a disease rating of 1.67 and 2.00 compared to 3.67 in the control plots, on a rating scale of 0–4 on cv. “Sancerre”. The yield increases in terms of corm and cormel weight were also highly substantial (Stroby: corms - approx. 2X, cormels -approx. 9X; Flint: corms - approx. 1.5X, cormels - approx. 6X). Furthermore, the plants treated with these two compounds remained green for two additional weeks as compared to those in the control plots. The third strobilurin, i.e. Amistar, neither reduced disease severity nor improved yield in a significant manner. Stroby was found to be the best of the three. The SAR compounds tested, viz., BTH and SA, neither reduced the disease nor improved yield in an appreciable manner over the control.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
None of the tested compounds significantly reduced floral infection of gladiolus relative to the control.
GladiolusOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“was tested against Botrytis blight of gladiolus”
e1“None of the compounds reduced floral infection in a significant manner over the control”
Claim · model-written summary
Stroby and Flint reduced foliar infection of gladiolus highly significantly relative to the control.
- Treatment
- Two strobilurins, viz. Stroby and Flinte2
- Outcome
- foliar infectione2
- Direction
- reducede2
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“was tested against Botrytis blight of gladiolus”
e2“Two strobilurins, viz. Stroby and Flint reduced foliar infection in a highly significant manner over the control”
Claim · model-written summary
Stroby and Flint gave disease ratings of 1.67 and 2.00 on a 0-4 scale, lower than 3.67 in the control plots.
- Material
- Sancerree3
- Treatment
- Stroby and Flinte2
- Outcome
- disease ratinge3
- Direction
- lowerinferrede3
- Value
- 1.67 and 2.00e3
- Qualifier
- 3.67e3
- Comparator
- control plotse3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“was tested against Botrytis blight of gladiolus”
e2“Two strobilurins, viz. Stroby and Flint reduced foliar infection in a highly significant manner over the control”
e3“These fungicides registered a disease rating of 1.67 and 2.00 compared to 3.67 in the control plots, on a rating scale of 0–4 on cv. “Sancerre””
Claim · model-written summary
Stroby increased corm yield of gladiolus by approximately 2X.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“was tested against Botrytis blight of gladiolus”
e4“The yield increases in terms of corm and cormel weight were also highly substantial (Stroby: corms - approx. 2X, cormels -approx. 9X; Flint: corms - approx. 1.5X, cormels - approx. 6X)”
Claim · model-written summary
Stroby increased cormel yield of gladiolus by approximately 9X.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“was tested against Botrytis blight of gladiolus”
e4“The yield increases in terms of corm and cormel weight were also highly substantial (Stroby: corms - approx. 2X, cormels -approx. 9X; Flint: corms - approx. 1.5X, cormels - approx. 6X)”
Claim · model-written summary
Flint increased corm yield of gladiolus by approximately 1.5X.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“was tested against Botrytis blight of gladiolus”
e4“The yield increases in terms of corm and cormel weight were also highly substantial (Stroby: corms - approx. 2X, cormels -approx. 9X; Flint: corms - approx. 1.5X, cormels - approx. 6X)”
Claim · model-written summary
Flint increased cormel yield of gladiolus by approximately 6X.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“was tested against Botrytis blight of gladiolus”
e4“The yield increases in terms of corm and cormel weight were also highly substantial (Stroby: corms - approx. 2X, cormels -approx. 9X; Flint: corms - approx. 1.5X, cormels - approx. 6X)”
Claim · model-written summary
Plants treated with Stroby and Flint remained green for two additional weeks compared with the control plots.
- Treatment
- these two compoundse5
- Outcome
- remained green for two additional weekse5
- Direction
- remainede5
- Comparator
- control plotse5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“was tested against Botrytis blight of gladiolus”
e5“the plants treated with these two compounds remained green for two additional weeks as compared to those in the control plots”
Claim · model-written summary
Amistar did not significantly reduce disease severity of gladiolus.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“was tested against Botrytis blight of gladiolus”
e6“The third strobilurin, i.e. Amistar, neither reduced disease severity nor improved yield in a significant manner”
Claim · model-written summary
Amistar did not significantly improve yield of gladiolus.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“was tested against Botrytis blight of gladiolus”
e6“The third strobilurin, i.e. Amistar, neither reduced disease severity nor improved yield in a significant manner”
Claim · model-written summary
Stroby was the best of the three fungicides tested on gladiolus.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“was tested against Botrytis blight of gladiolus”
e7“Stroby was found to be the best of the three”
Claim · model-written summary
BTH and SA did not appreciably reduce disease of gladiolus relative to the control.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“was tested against Botrytis blight of gladiolus”
e6“The SAR compounds tested, viz., BTH and SA, neither reduced the disease nor improved yield in an appreciable manner over the control”
Claim · model-written summary
BTH and SA did not appreciably improve yield of gladiolus relative to the control.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“was tested against Botrytis blight of gladiolus”
e6“The SAR compounds tested, viz., BTH and SA, neither reduced the disease nor improved yield in an appreciable manner over the control”
The same questions in other papers
salicylic acid · yield · GladiolusPositive and negative results
9 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →acibenzolar-S-methyl · disease · GladiolusResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.