Paper · 1999 · Journal of Range Management

Plant Responses to Defoliation and Resource Supplementation in the Pryor Mountains

Jace T. Fahnestock; James K. Detling

16
claims
21
verbatim quotes
37
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field studies were conducted in 2 types of grasslands in the Pryor Mountain Wild Horse Range of northern Wyoming and southern Montana to examine plant biomass production and nitrogen responses to the separate and combined effects of graminoid defoliation and increased environmental resource (water or nutrients) supply. Short-term plant responses were monitored over 2 years which differed substantially in growing season precipitation. In the arid, low elevation grassland, total grass biomass was significantly lower in the dry year than the wet year in all treatments. Defoliation of the grasses did not reduce their aboveground biomass production in the wet year, but severely reduced it in the dry year, primarily because of a decrease in tiller density. Mass of remaining individual tillers increased with clipping in the dry year, and nitrogen concentrations of the grasses increased with clipping in both years. Irrigation alone increased total belowground biomass compared to the other treatments, but did not increase the aboveground biomass production of any plant functional group. Clipping plus irrigation resulted in greater total aboveground biomass production and higher nitrogen concentrations of the grasses than control or irrigated treatments. Clipping graminoids in the more mesic montane grassland did not decrease their biomass production in either year, but did increase their nitrogen concentrations and increase the collective aboveground biomass production of the other plant functional groups. Fertilization and fertilization plus clipping significantly increased total aboveground biomass production in both years, and total belowground biomass was greatest in fertilized plots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grass biomass was lower in the dry year than the wet year.

Taxon
grasse0
Outcome
total grass biomasse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
wet yeare0
Setting
arid, low elevation grasslande0

Verbatim

e0

“In the arid, low elevation grassland, total grass biomass was significantly lower in the dry year than the wet year in all treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–572 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation was associated with did not reduce aboveground biomass production.

Taxon
grassese0
Treatment
Defoliatione0
Outcome
aboveground biomass productione0
Direction
did not reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Defoliation of the grasses did not reduce their aboveground biomass production in the wet year, but severely reduced it in the dry year, primarily because of a decrease in tiller density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–760 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation was associated with severely reduced aboveground biomass production.

Taxon
grassese0
Treatment
Defoliatione0
Outcome
aboveground biomass productione0
Direction
severely reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Defoliation of the grasses did not reduce their aboveground biomass production in the wet year, but severely reduced it in the dry year, primarily because of a decrease in tiller density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–760 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation was associated with decrease tiller density.

Taxon
grassese0
Treatment
Defoliatione0
Outcome
tiller densitye0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Defoliation of the grasses did not reduce their aboveground biomass production in the wet year, but severely reduced it in the dry year, primarily because of a decrease in tiller density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–760 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

clipping was associated with increased Mass of remaining individual tillers.

Taxon
tillerse0
Treatment
clippinge0
Outcome
Mass of remaining individual tillerse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Mass of remaining individual tillers increased with clipping in the dry year, and nitrogen concentrations of the grasses increased with clipping in both years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–920 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

clipping was associated with increased nitrogen concentrations of the grasses.

Taxon
grassese0
Treatment
clippinge0
Outcome
nitrogen concentrations of the grassese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Mass of remaining individual tillers increased with clipping in the dry year, and nitrogen concentrations of the grasses increased with clipping in both years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–920 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation was associated with increased total belowground biomass.

Taxon
Plantt0
Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
total belowground biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation alone increased total belowground biomass compared to the other treatments, but did not increase the aboveground biomass production of any plant functional group.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1094 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant Responses to Defoliation and Resource Supplementation in the Pryor Mountains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation was associated with did not increase aboveground biomass production.

Taxon
Plantt0
Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
aboveground biomass productione0
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation alone increased total belowground biomass compared to the other treatments, but did not increase the aboveground biomass production of any plant functional group.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1094 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant Responses to Defoliation and Resource Supplementation in the Pryor Mountains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clipping plus irrigation was associated with greater total aboveground biomass production.

Taxon
grasse0
Treatment
Clipping plus irrigatione0
Outcome
total aboveground biomass productione0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
control or irrigated treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“Clipping plus irrigation resulted in greater total aboveground biomass production and higher nitrogen concentrations of the grasses than control or irrigated treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1264 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clipping plus irrigation was associated with higher nitrogen concentrations of the grasses.

Taxon
grasse0
Treatment
Clipping plus irrigatione0
Outcome
nitrogen concentrations of the grassese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
control or irrigated treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“Clipping plus irrigation resulted in greater total aboveground biomass production and higher nitrogen concentrations of the grasses than control or irrigated treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1264 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clipping was associated with did not decrease biomass production.

Taxon
graminoidse0
Treatment
Clippinge0
Outcome
biomass productione0
Direction
did not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Clipping graminoids in the more mesic montane grassland did not decrease their biomass production in either year, but did increase their nitrogen concentrations and increase the collective aboveground biomass production of the other plant functional groups.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1522 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clipping was associated with increase nitrogen concentrations.

Taxon
graminoidse0
Treatment
Clippinge0
Outcome
nitrogen concentrationse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Clipping graminoids in the more mesic montane grassland did not decrease their biomass production in either year, but did increase their nitrogen concentrations and increase the collective aboveground biomass production of the other plant functional groups.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1522 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clipping was associated with increase collective aboveground biomass production of the other plant functional groups.

Taxon
graminoidse0
Treatment
Clippinge0
Outcome
collective aboveground biomass production of the other plant functional groupse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Clipping graminoids in the more mesic montane grassland did not decrease their biomass production in either year, but did increase their nitrogen concentrations and increase the collective aboveground biomass production of the other plant functional groups.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1522 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization was associated with increased total aboveground biomass production.

Taxon
Plantt0
Treatment
Fertilizatione0
Outcome
total aboveground biomass productione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilization and fertilization plus clipping significantly increased total aboveground biomass production in both years, and total belowground biomass was greatest in fertilized plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1708 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant Responses to Defoliation and Resource Supplementation in the Pryor Mountains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

fertilization plus clipping was associated with increased total aboveground biomass production.

Taxon
Plantt0
Treatment
fertilization plus clippinge0
Outcome
total aboveground biomass productione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilization and fertilization plus clipping significantly increased total aboveground biomass production in both years, and total belowground biomass was greatest in fertilized plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1708 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant Responses to Defoliation and Resource Supplementation in the Pryor Mountains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

fertilized plots was associated with greatest total belowground biomass.

Taxon
Plantt0
Treatment
fertilized plotse0
Outcome
total belowground biomasse0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilization and fertilization plus clipping significantly increased total aboveground biomass production in both years, and total belowground biomass was greatest in fertilized plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1708 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant Responses to Defoliation and Resource Supplementation in the Pryor Mountains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑