Abstract
To find out the effect of sulfurea on maize crop, an experiment was conducted at ARI Tarnab during Kharif, 2011. The experiment consisted of six treatments with three replications in RCB design. N, P and K were applied in the form of urea, Diammonium phosphate (DAP) and muriate of potash (MOP), respectively. The recommended dose of the sulfurea at the rate of 16L per hectare was applied in the first irrigation (half of the recommended i.e. 8L) and on the fourth irrigation (another half of the recommended i.e. 8L) when crop was at silking stage. The application of sulfur in the form of sulfurea significantly increased the yield of maize crop. The highest grain yield of 6090 kg ha-1 was obtained by the treatment where sulfurea was applied along with NPK fertilizers; whereas lowest grain yield was recorded in plots where no fertilizer was applied. Maximum dry matter yield was obtained when sulfurea was applied with NPK while minimum was obtained in control plots. The effect of sulfurea on the chemical properties of the soil was not very obvious and non-significant effect was observed. No effect on soil pH, electrical conductivity, organic matter and lime was observed which revealed that sulfurea has no effect on these chemical properties of soil. The post harvest soil analysis showed that nitrogen content was not significantly affected while phosphorus and sulfur content was significantly affected by the application of sulfur as sulfurea. Leaf analysis indicated the sulfur content was increased significantly also the uptake was increased significantly. These results indicated that the application of sulfur in the form of sulfurea should be encouraged to apply to the crops like maize, because it increased the yield and improved the soil nutrient content.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfur applied as sulfurea significantly increased maize yield.
Zea maysNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“To find out the effect of sulfurea on maize crop, an experiment was conducted at ARI Tarnab during Kharif, 2011”
e1“The application of sulfur in the form of sulfurea significantly increased the yield of maize crop”
Claim · model-written summary
Maize grain yield was highest where sulfurea was applied with NPK fertilizers.
- Treatment
- sulfurea was applied along with NPK fertilizerse1
- Outcome
- grain yielde1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Value
- 6090 kg ha-1e1
- Setting
- ARI Tarnabe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“To find out the effect of sulfurea on maize crop, an experiment was conducted at ARI Tarnab during Kharif, 2011”
e1“The highest grain yield of 6090 kg ha-1 was obtained by the treatment where sulfurea was applied along with NPK fertilizers”
Claim · model-written summary
Maximum maize dry matter yield was obtained with sulfurea applied with NPK, compared with control plots.
- Treatment
- sulfurea was applied with NPKe1
- Outcome
- dry matter yielde1
- Direction
- Maximume1
- Comparator
- control plotse1
- Setting
- ARI Tarnabe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“To find out the effect of sulfurea on maize crop, an experiment was conducted at ARI Tarnab during Kharif, 2011”
e1“Maximum dry matter yield was obtained when sulfurea was applied with NPK while minimum was obtained in control plots”
Claim · model-written summary
Maize grain yield was lowest in plots where no fertilizer was applied.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“To find out the effect of sulfurea on maize crop, an experiment was conducted at ARI Tarnab during Kharif, 2011”
e1“lowest grain yield was recorded in plots where no fertilizer was applied”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfurea had no effect on soil pH, electrical conductivity and organic matter.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“To find out the effect of sulfurea on maize crop, an experiment was conducted at ARI Tarnab during Kharif, 2011”
e1“No effect on soil pH, electrical conductivity, organic matter and lime was observed”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfurea had no effect on soil lime.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“To find out the effect of sulfurea on maize crop, an experiment was conducted at ARI Tarnab during Kharif, 2011”
e1“No effect on soil pH, electrical conductivity, organic matter and lime was observed”
Claim · model-written summary
Application of sulfur as sulfurea did not significantly affect soil nitrogen content after harvest.
- Treatment
- application of sulfur as sulfureae1
- Outcome
- nitrogen contente1
- Direction
- not significantly affectede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“To find out the effect of sulfurea on maize crop, an experiment was conducted at ARI Tarnab during Kharif, 2011”
e1“The post harvest soil analysis showed that nitrogen content was not significantly affected while phosphorus and sulfur content was significantly affected by the application of sulfur as sulfurea”
Claim · model-written summary
Application of sulfur as sulfurea significantly affected soil phosphorus and sulfur content after harvest.
- Treatment
- application of sulfur as sulfureae1
- Outcome
- phosphorus and sulfur contente1
- Direction
- significantly affectede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“To find out the effect of sulfurea on maize crop, an experiment was conducted at ARI Tarnab during Kharif, 2011”
e1“The post harvest soil analysis showed that nitrogen content was not significantly affected while phosphorus and sulfur content was significantly affected by the application of sulfur as sulfurea”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfurea increased the sulfur content of maize leaves significantly.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“To find out the effect of sulfurea on maize crop, an experiment was conducted at ARI Tarnab during Kharif, 2011”
e1“Leaf analysis indicated the sulfur content was increased significantly also the uptake was increased significantly”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfurea increased the sulfur uptake of maize significantly.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“To find out the effect of sulfurea on maize crop, an experiment was conducted at ARI Tarnab during Kharif, 2011”
e1“Leaf analysis indicated the sulfur content was increased significantly also the uptake was increased significantly”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend that sulfur in the form of sulfurea be applied to crops such as maize.
- Outcome
- application of sulfur in the form of sulfurea should be encouragede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the application of sulfur in the form of sulfurea should be encouraged to apply to the crops like maize”
The same questions in other papers
sulfur atom · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
33 papers more in this group
See all 37 papers →sulfur atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
78 papers more in this group
See all 82 papers →fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
3,904 papers more in this group
See all 3,908 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.