Paper · 2022 · Agriculture

Transparent and Black Film Mulching Improve Photosynthesis and Yield of Summer Maize in North China Plain

Shanshan Qin; Yanqun Zhang; Jiandong Wang; et al.

16
claims
32
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In order to clarify the influences of drip irrigation under different mulch materials on crop yield, field experiments were carried out in the North China Plain for two seasons in 2020 and 2021. The changes in field microenvironment, photosynthetic capacity, leaf biological factors, and maize growth indexes were analyzed under drip irrigation with transparent film (W), black film (B), and straw mulching (S), with a nonmulching field as control (CK). The results showed that compared with CK, the yield of W and B increased by 7.2–9.9% and 7.1–12.4%, and the yield of S did not change significantly. The increase in yield was related to the improvement of the field microenvironment and photosynthetic capacity and higher LAI. Compared with CK, the soil water content 0–40 cm below the soil surface of W, B, and S increased by 13.6%, 9.1%, and 4.6%, respectively, and the 5 cm effective accumulated soil temperature of W and B increased by 7.9–10.2% and 4.1–4.7%, respectively. The maximum carboxylation rate (Vmax) of W, B, and S at the jointing stage was significantly increased by 3.5–17.3%, 12.7–17.6%, and 10.1–12.7% compared with CK. There was a significant linear correlation between Vmax and Nmass, and the correlation was affected by mulching treatments. At the jointing stage, compared with the CK, the LAI of W and B significantly increased by 8.6–66.5% and 7.2–56.0%, but there was no significant difference between S and CK. In conclusion, the increase in yield of W and B resulted from the combined effect of increasing LAI, Vmax, and soil water content and temperature.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transparent film increased yield by 7.2–9.9% versus no mulch.

Taxon
Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
We0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7.2–9.9%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared with CK, the yield of W and B increased by 7.2–9.9% and 7.1–12.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–552 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black film increased yield by 7.1–12.4% versus no mulch.

Taxon
Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Be0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7.1–12.4%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared with CK, the yield of W and B increased by 7.2–9.9% and 7.1–12.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–552 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw mulch did not significantly change yield.

Taxon
Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Se0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not changee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yield of S did not change significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–601 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transparent film increased soil water content by 13.6%.

Taxon
Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
We0
Outcome
soil water contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13.6%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with CK, the soil water content 0–40 cm below the soil surface of W, B, and S increased by 13.6%, 9.1%, and 4.6%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–865 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black film increased soil water content by 9.1%.

Taxon
Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Be0
Outcome
soil water contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9.1%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with CK, the soil water content 0–40 cm below the soil surface of W, B, and S increased by 13.6%, 9.1%, and 4.6%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–865 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw mulch increased soil water content by 4.6%.

Taxon
Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Se0
Outcome
soil water contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4.6%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with CK, the soil water content 0–40 cm below the soil surface of W, B, and S increased by 13.6%, 9.1%, and 4.6%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–865 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transparent film increased effective accumulated soil temperature by 7.9–10.2%.

Taxon
Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
We0
Outcome
effective accumulated soil temperaturee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7.9–10.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 5 cm effective accumulated soil temperature of W and B increased by 7.9–10.2% and 4.1–4.7%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black film increased effective accumulated soil temperature by 4.1–4.7%.

Taxon
Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Be0
Outcome
effective accumulated soil temperaturee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4.1–4.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 5 cm effective accumulated soil temperature of W and B increased by 7.9–10.2% and 4.1–4.7%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Transparent film increased jointing-stage Vmax by 3.5–17.3%.

Taxon
Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
jointing stagee0
Treatment
We0
Outcome
maximum carboxylation ratee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3.5–17.3%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum carboxylation rate (Vmax) of W, B, and S at the jointing stage was significantly increased by 3.5–17.3%, 12.7–17.6%, and 10.1–12.7% compared with CK.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1142 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Black film increased jointing-stage Vmax by 12.7–17.6%.

Taxon
Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Be0
Outcome
maximum carboxylation ratee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12.7–17.6%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum carboxylation rate (Vmax) of W, B, and S at the jointing stage was significantly increased by 3.5–17.3%, 12.7–17.6%, and 10.1–12.7% compared with CK.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1142 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw mulch increased jointing-stage Vmax by 10.1–12.7%.

Taxon
Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Se0
Outcome
maximum carboxylation ratee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10.1–12.7%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum carboxylation rate (Vmax) of W, B, and S at the jointing stage was significantly increased by 3.5–17.3%, 12.7–17.6%, and 10.1–12.7% compared with CK.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1142 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–84 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vmax and Nmass had a significant linear correlation influenced by mulch.

Taxon
Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
mulching treatmentse0
Outcome
Vmaxe0
Qualifier
Nmasse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a significant linear correlation between Vmax and Nmass, and the correlation was affected by mulching treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1266 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Transparent film increased jointing-stage LAI by 8.6–66.5%.

Taxon
Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
We0
Outcome
LAIe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8.6–66.5%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the jointing stage, compared with the CK, the LAI of W and B significantly increased by 8.6–66.5% and 7.2–56.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1381 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Black film increased jointing-stage LAI by 7.2–56.0%.

Taxon
Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Be0
Outcome
LAIe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7.2–56.0%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the jointing stage, compared with the CK, the LAI of W and B significantly increased by 8.6–66.5% and 7.2–56.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1381 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw mulch did not significantly change jointing-stage LAI.

Taxon
Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Se0
Outcome
differencee0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no significant difference between S and CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1387–1439 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–84 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute film yield gains to increased LAI, Vmax, soil water and temperature.

Taxon
Summer MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
W and Be0
Outcome
increase in yielde0
Qualifier
combined effect of increasing LAI, Vmax, and soil water content and temperaturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the increase in yield of W and B resulted from the combined effect of increasing LAI, Vmax, and soil water content and temperature.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1456–1587 · show in text ↑
t0

“Summer Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–84 · show in text ↑

boron atom · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

56 papers: 46 positive, 10 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

82 papers: 69 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 69 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

boron atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

83 papers: 72 positive, 11 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

79 papers more in this group

See all 83 papers →

boron atom · soil: physics · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

sulfur atom · soil: physics · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.