Abstract
Studies were conducted to evaluate newer molecule, Spinosad (Tracer) 45% SC along with other standard insecticides against pigeonpea pod borers during 2002 and 2003 Kharif seasons at the Crop Research Centre of Govind Ballab Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar. Lower numbers of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner), Maruca vitrata (Geyer) and Melanagromyza obtusa (Malloch) were recorded in spinosad 90g, spinosad 73g, spinosad 56g and spinosad 45g a.i./ha, compared to other standard insecticides and untreated control. Lower pod damage was observed in spinosad 90g, spinosad 73g, spinosad 56g and spinosad 45g, treatments as against untreated control over two years. Similarly, greater grain yields were also recorded by spinosad 90g (1741 kg/ha), spinosad 73g (1463 kg/ha), spinosad 45g (1218 kg/ha) and spinosad 56g (1213 kg/ha), as compared to control (768 kg/ha).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad treatments recorded fewer Helicoverpa armigera than standard insecticides and untreated controls.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajant0 - Treatment
- spinosad 90g, spinosad 73g, spinosad 56g and spinosad 45g a.i./hae0
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigerae0peste1 - Outcome
- numbers of Helicoverpa armigerae0
- Direction
- Lowere0
- Comparator
- other standard insecticides and untreated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

_gusano_cogollero.png?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Lower numbers of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner), Maruca vitrata (Geyer) and Melanagromyza obtusa (Malloch) were recorded in spinosad 90g, spinosad 73g, spinosad 56g and spinosad 45g a.i./ha, compared to other standard insecticides and untreated control”
t0“pigeonpea”
e1“pigeonpea pod borers”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad treatments recorded fewer Maruca vitrata than standard insecticides and untreated controls.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajant0 - Treatment
- spinosad 90g, spinosad 73g, spinosad 56g and spinosad 45g a.i./hae0
- Interactor
- Maruca vitrata
Maruca vitratae0peste1 - Outcome
- numbers of Helicoverpa armigerae0
- Direction
- Lowere0
- Comparator
- other standard insecticides and untreated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“Lower numbers of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner), Maruca vitrata (Geyer) and Melanagromyza obtusa (Malloch) were recorded in spinosad 90g, spinosad 73g, spinosad 56g and spinosad 45g a.i./ha, compared to other standard insecticides and untreated control”
t0“pigeonpea”
e1“pigeonpea pod borers”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad treatments recorded fewer Melanagromyza obtusa than standard insecticides and untreated controls.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajant0 - Treatment
- spinosad 90g, spinosad 73g, spinosad 56g and spinosad 45g a.i./hae0
- Interactor
- Melanagromyza obtusa
Melanagromyza obtusae0peste1 - Outcome
- numbers of Helicoverpa armigerae0
- Direction
- Lowere0
- Comparator
- other standard insecticides and untreated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“Lower numbers of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner), Maruca vitrata (Geyer) and Melanagromyza obtusa (Malloch) were recorded in spinosad 90g, spinosad 73g, spinosad 56g and spinosad 45g a.i./ha, compared to other standard insecticides and untreated control”
t0“pigeonpea”
e1“pigeonpea pod borers”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad treatments reduced pigeonpea pod damage versus untreated controls over two years.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajant0 - Treatment
- spinosad 90g, spinosad 73g, spinosad 56g and spinosad 45ge0
- Outcome
- pod damagee0
- Direction
- Lowere0
- Comparator
- untreated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Lower pod damage was observed in spinosad 90g, spinosad 73g, spinosad 56g and spinosad 45g, treatments as against untreated control over two years”
t0“pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad 90g gave grain yield of 1741 kg/ha, above the control.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajant0 - Treatment
- spinosad 90ge0
- Outcome
- grain yieldse0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Value
- 1741 kg/hae0
- Qualifier
- 768 kg/hae0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“greater grain yields were also recorded by spinosad 90g (1741 kg/ha), spinosad 73g (1463 kg/ha), spinosad 45g (1218 kg/ha) and spinosad 56g (1213 kg/ha), as compared to control (768 kg/ha)”
t0“pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad 73g gave grain yield of 1463 kg/ha, above the control.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajant0 - Treatment
- spinosad 73ge0
- Outcome
- grain yieldse0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Value
- 1463 kg/hae0
- Qualifier
- 768 kg/hae0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“greater grain yields were also recorded by spinosad 90g (1741 kg/ha), spinosad 73g (1463 kg/ha), spinosad 45g (1218 kg/ha) and spinosad 56g (1213 kg/ha), as compared to control (768 kg/ha)”
t0“pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad 45g gave grain yield of 1218 kg/ha, above the control.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajant0 - Treatment
- spinosad 45ge0
- Outcome
- grain yieldse0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Value
- 1218 kg/hae0
- Qualifier
- 768 kg/hae0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“greater grain yields were also recorded by spinosad 90g (1741 kg/ha), spinosad 73g (1463 kg/ha), spinosad 45g (1218 kg/ha) and spinosad 56g (1213 kg/ha), as compared to control (768 kg/ha)”
t0“pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad 56g gave grain yield of 1213 kg/ha, above the control.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajant0 - Treatment
- spinosad 56ge0
- Outcome
- grain yieldse0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Value
- 1213 kg/hae0
- Qualifier
- 768 kg/hae0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“greater grain yields were also recorded by spinosad 90g (1741 kg/ha), spinosad 73g (1463 kg/ha), spinosad 45g (1218 kg/ha) and spinosad 56g (1213 kg/ha), as compared to control (768 kg/ha)”
t0“pigeonpea”
The same questions in other papers
spinosad · Maruca vitrata · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →spinosad · Helicoverpa armigera · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →spinosad · pest · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree
9 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →spinosad · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree
16 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.