Paper · 2005 · Indian journal of plant protection

Evaluation of Naturalyte Spinosad Against Pod Borer Complex in Early Pigeonpea

Vishal Mittal; Ram Ujagir

8
claims
19
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Studies were conducted to evaluate newer molecule, Spinosad (Tracer) 45% SC along with other standard insecticides against pigeonpea pod borers during 2002 and 2003 Kharif seasons at the Crop Research Centre of Govind Ballab Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar. Lower numbers of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner), Maruca vitrata (Geyer) and Melanagromyza obtusa (Malloch) were recorded in spinosad 90g, spinosad 73g, spinosad 56g and spinosad 45g a.i./ha, compared to other standard insecticides and untreated control. Lower pod damage was observed in spinosad 90g, spinosad 73g, spinosad 56g and spinosad 45g, treatments as against untreated control over two years. Similarly, greater grain yields were also recorded by spinosad 90g (1741 kg/ha), spinosad 73g (1463 kg/ha), spinosad 45g (1218 kg/ha) and spinosad 56g (1213 kg/ha), as compared to control (768 kg/ha).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad treatments recorded fewer Helicoverpa armigera than standard insecticides and untreated controls.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
spinosad 90g, spinosad 73g, spinosad 56g and spinosad 45g a.i./hae0
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0peste1
Outcome
numbers of Helicoverpa armigerae0
Direction
Lowere0
Comparator
other standard insecticides and untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lower numbers of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner), Maruca vitrata (Geyer) and Melanagromyza obtusa (Malloch) were recorded in spinosad 90g, spinosad 73g, spinosad 56g and spinosad 45g a.i./ha, compared to other standard insecticides and untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–534 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 69–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“pigeonpea pod borers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad treatments recorded fewer Maruca vitrata than standard insecticides and untreated controls.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
spinosad 90g, spinosad 73g, spinosad 56g and spinosad 45g a.i./hae0
Interactor
Maruca vitrataMaruca vitratae0peste1
Outcome
numbers of Helicoverpa armigerae0
Direction
Lowere0
Comparator
other standard insecticides and untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Maruca vitrata
Maruca vitrata · InteractorRavi Vaidyanathan · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lower numbers of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner), Maruca vitrata (Geyer) and Melanagromyza obtusa (Malloch) were recorded in spinosad 90g, spinosad 73g, spinosad 56g and spinosad 45g a.i./ha, compared to other standard insecticides and untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–534 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 69–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“pigeonpea pod borers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad treatments recorded fewer Melanagromyza obtusa than standard insecticides and untreated controls.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
spinosad 90g, spinosad 73g, spinosad 56g and spinosad 45g a.i./hae0
Interactor
Melanagromyza obtusaMelanagromyza obtusae0peste1
Outcome
numbers of Helicoverpa armigerae0
Direction
Lowere0
Comparator
other standard insecticides and untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Melanagromyza obtusa
Melanagromyza obtusa · InteractorDigvijaysinh Padhiyar · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lower numbers of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner), Maruca vitrata (Geyer) and Melanagromyza obtusa (Malloch) were recorded in spinosad 90g, spinosad 73g, spinosad 56g and spinosad 45g a.i./ha, compared to other standard insecticides and untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–534 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 69–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“pigeonpea pod borers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad treatments reduced pigeonpea pod damage versus untreated controls over two years.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
spinosad 90g, spinosad 73g, spinosad 56g and spinosad 45ge0
Outcome
pod damagee0
Direction
Lowere0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lower pod damage was observed in spinosad 90g, spinosad 73g, spinosad 56g and spinosad 45g, treatments as against untreated control over two years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–682 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 69–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad 90g gave grain yield of 1741 kg/ha, above the control.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
spinosad 90ge0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
greatere0
Value
1741 kg/hae0
Qualifier
768 kg/hae0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greater grain yields were also recorded by spinosad 90g (1741 kg/ha), spinosad 73g (1463 kg/ha), spinosad 45g (1218 kg/ha) and spinosad 56g (1213 kg/ha), as compared to control (768 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 69–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad 73g gave grain yield of 1463 kg/ha, above the control.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
spinosad 73ge0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
greatere0
Value
1463 kg/hae0
Qualifier
768 kg/hae0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greater grain yields were also recorded by spinosad 90g (1741 kg/ha), spinosad 73g (1463 kg/ha), spinosad 45g (1218 kg/ha) and spinosad 56g (1213 kg/ha), as compared to control (768 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 69–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad 45g gave grain yield of 1218 kg/ha, above the control.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
spinosad 45ge0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
greatere0
Value
1218 kg/hae0
Qualifier
768 kg/hae0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greater grain yields were also recorded by spinosad 90g (1741 kg/ha), spinosad 73g (1463 kg/ha), spinosad 45g (1218 kg/ha) and spinosad 56g (1213 kg/ha), as compared to control (768 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 69–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad 56g gave grain yield of 1213 kg/ha, above the control.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
spinosad 56ge0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
greatere0
Value
1213 kg/hae0
Qualifier
768 kg/hae0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greater grain yields were also recorded by spinosad 90g (1741 kg/ha), spinosad 73g (1463 kg/ha), spinosad 45g (1218 kg/ha) and spinosad 56g (1213 kg/ha), as compared to control (768 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“pigeonpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 69–78 · show in text ↑

spinosad · Maruca vitrata · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

spinosad · Helicoverpa armigera · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

spinosad · pest · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

spinosad · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.