Abstract
ABSTRACT An experiment conducted during Kharif, 2010 to evaluate the efficacy of different biopesticides against gram pod borer Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) and legume pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Geyer) on pigeon pea revealed that there is no significant difference between the treatments against pod damage due to gram pod borer, H. armigera since the population and thereby pod damage was very low during the season. The untreated check has recorded only 1.63% pod damage due to Helicoverpa. The per cent inflorescence damage due to legume pod borer was lowest in spinosad 45% SC @ 73 g a.i/ha (4.74%), followed by Bacillus thuringiensis-1 @ 1.5 kg/ha (10.52%) and Beauveria bassiana SC formulation @ 300mg/Lt (14.15%) with 80.9, 57.6 and 42.9 per cent reduction over control respectively as against control (24.79%). The pod damage due to Maruca was the lowest in spinosad (17.38%), followed by Bt.-1 (27.57%) and B. bassiana SC formulation @ 300 mg/lt (33.82%) as against control (45.84%) with 62.1, 39.9 and 26.2 per cent reduction over control respectively. The highest grain yield was recorded in spinosad 45% SC @ 73 g.i/ha treated plots (831.0 kg/ha), followed by Bt.1 @ 1.5 kg/ha (743.1 kg/ha) and B. bassiana SC formulation @ 300mg/Lt (694.4 kg/ha) with 104.0, 82.4 and 70.5 per cent increase over control respectively as against the minimum yield of 407.4 kg/ha in the untreated check.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Treatments did not differ significantly for Helicoverpa pod damage.
- Taxon
- pigeon pea
Cajanus cajane1 - Treatment
- treatmentse0
- Interactor
- H. armigera
_gusano_cogollero.png?width=60)
Helicoverpa armigerae0pest - Outcome
- pod damage due to gram pod borer, H. armigerae0
- Direction
- no significant differencee0
- Comparator
- untreated checke2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_gusano_cogollero.png?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“there is no significant difference between the treatments against pod damage due to gram pod borer, H. armigera”
e1“on pigeon pea”
e2“The untreated check has recorded”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment reduced Maruca inflorescence damage by 80.9 per cent.
- Taxon
- pigeon peaCajanus cajane1
- Treatment
- spinosad 45% SC @ 73 g a.i/hae0
- Interactor
- Maruca vitrata
Maruca vitratae2pest - Outcome
- inflorescence damage due to legume pod borere0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 4.74%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The per cent inflorescence damage due to legume pod borer was lowest in spinosad 45% SC @ 73 g a.i/ha (4.74%), followed by Bacillus thuringiensis-1 @ 1.5 kg/ha (10.52%) and Beauveria bassiana SC formulation @ 300mg/Lt (14.15%) with 80.9, 57.6 and 42.9 per cent reduction over control respectively as against control (24.79%)”
e1“on pigeon pea”
e2“Maruca vitrata (Geyer)”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment reduced Maruca inflorescence damage by 57.6 per cent.
- Taxon
- pigeon peaCajanus cajane1
- Treatment
- Bacillus thuringiensis-1 @ 1.5 kg/hae0
- Interactor
- Maruca vitrataMaruca vitratae2pest
- Outcome
- inflorescence damage due to legume pod borere0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 10.52%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The per cent inflorescence damage due to legume pod borer was lowest in spinosad 45% SC @ 73 g a.i/ha (4.74%), followed by Bacillus thuringiensis-1 @ 1.5 kg/ha (10.52%) and Beauveria bassiana SC formulation @ 300mg/Lt (14.15%) with 80.9, 57.6 and 42.9 per cent reduction over control respectively as against control (24.79%)”
e1“on pigeon pea”
e2“Maruca vitrata (Geyer)”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment reduced Maruca inflorescence damage by 42.9 per cent.
- Taxon
- pigeon peaCajanus cajane1
- Treatment
- Beauveria bassiana SC formulation @ 300mg/Lte0
- Interactor
- Maruca vitrataMaruca vitratae2pest
- Outcome
- inflorescence damage due to legume pod borere0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 14.15%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The per cent inflorescence damage due to legume pod borer was lowest in spinosad 45% SC @ 73 g a.i/ha (4.74%), followed by Bacillus thuringiensis-1 @ 1.5 kg/ha (10.52%) and Beauveria bassiana SC formulation @ 300mg/Lt (14.15%) with 80.9, 57.6 and 42.9 per cent reduction over control respectively as against control (24.79%)”
e1“on pigeon pea”
e2“Maruca vitrata (Geyer)”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment reduced Maruca pod damage.
- Taxon
- pigeon peaCajanus cajane1
- Treatment
- spinosade0
- Outcome
- pod damage due to Marucae0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 17.38%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The pod damage due to Maruca was the lowest in spinosad (17.38%), followed by Bt.-1 (27.57%) and B. bassiana SC formulation @ 300 mg/lt (33.82%) as against control (45.84%) with 62.1, 39.9 and 26.2 per cent reduction over control respectively”
e1“on pigeon pea”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment reduced Maruca pod damage.
- Taxon
- pigeon peaCajanus cajane1
- Treatment
- Bt.-1e0
- Outcome
- pod damage due to Marucae0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 27.57%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The pod damage due to Maruca was the lowest in spinosad (17.38%), followed by Bt.-1 (27.57%) and B. bassiana SC formulation @ 300 mg/lt (33.82%) as against control (45.84%) with 62.1, 39.9 and 26.2 per cent reduction over control respectively”
e1“on pigeon pea”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment reduced Maruca pod damage.
- Taxon
- pigeon peaCajanus cajane1
- Treatment
- B. bassiana SC formulation @ 300 mg/lte0
- Outcome
- pod damage due to Marucae0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 33.82%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The pod damage due to Maruca was the lowest in spinosad (17.38%), followed by Bt.-1 (27.57%) and B. bassiana SC formulation @ 300 mg/lt (33.82%) as against control (45.84%) with 62.1, 39.9 and 26.2 per cent reduction over control respectively”
e1“on pigeon pea”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment increased grain yield relative to untreated check.
- Taxon
- pigeon peaCajanus cajane1
- Treatment
- spinosad 45% SC @ 73 g.i/hae0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 831.0 kg/hae0
- Comparator
- untreated checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest grain yield was recorded in spinosad 45% SC @ 73 g.i/ha treated plots (831.0 kg/ha), followed by Bt.1 @ 1.5 kg/ha (743.1 kg/ha) and B. bassiana SC formulation @ 300mg/Lt (694.4 kg/ha) with 104.0, 82.4 and 70.5 per cent increase over control respectively as against the minimum yield of 407.4 kg/ha in the untreated check”
e1“on pigeon pea”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment increased grain yield relative to untreated check.
- Taxon
- pigeon peaCajanus cajane1
- Treatment
- Bt.1 @ 1.5 kg/hae0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 743.1 kg/hae0
- Comparator
- untreated checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest grain yield was recorded in spinosad 45% SC @ 73 g.i/ha treated plots (831.0 kg/ha), followed by Bt.1 @ 1.5 kg/ha (743.1 kg/ha) and B. bassiana SC formulation @ 300mg/Lt (694.4 kg/ha) with 104.0, 82.4 and 70.5 per cent increase over control respectively as against the minimum yield of 407.4 kg/ha in the untreated check”
e1“on pigeon pea”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment increased grain yield relative to untreated check.
- Taxon
- pigeon peaCajanus cajane1
- Treatment
- B. bassiana SC formulation @ 300mg/Lte0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 694.4 kg/hae0
- Comparator
- untreated checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest grain yield was recorded in spinosad 45% SC @ 73 g.i/ha treated plots (831.0 kg/ha), followed by Bt.1 @ 1.5 kg/ha (743.1 kg/ha) and B. bassiana SC formulation @ 300mg/Lt (694.4 kg/ha) with 104.0, 82.4 and 70.5 per cent increase over control respectively as against the minimum yield of 407.4 kg/ha in the untreated check”
e1“on pigeon pea”
The same questions in other papers
Beauveria bassiana · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
spinosad · Maruca · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
spinosad · Maruca vitrata · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →spinosad · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree
16 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →transgenic · Maruca · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
transgenic · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.