Paper · 1983 · Weed Science

Fluridone for Annual Weed Control in Western Irrigated Cotton (Gossypium Hirsutum)

John H. Miller; Charles H. Carter

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

For 3 yr, fluridone {1-methyl-3-phenyl-5-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-4(1 H )-pyridinone} at 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 kg/ha, was applied with or without 0.6 kg/ha of trifluralin (α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro -N,N- dipropyl- p -toluidine) before the preplanting irrigation for cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.). Without trifluralin, fluridone at 0.1 kg/ha controlled less than 60% of annual grasses or redroot pigweed ( Amaranthus retroflexus L.), but the 0.3-kg/ha rate controlled 90%. With trifluralin, fluridone at all rates controlled 98% of these weeds. Fluridone alone controlled 85% or more of black nightshade ( Solanum nigrum L.). Fluridone did not alter cotton stand or yield. Fluridone residues 8 months after treatment reduced growth of several crops and weeds by 75% or more.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluridone alone at 0.1 kg/ha controlled less than 60% of annual grasses.

Treatment
fluridone at 0.1 kg/hae0
Interactor
annual grassese0weed
Outcome
controlled less than 60% of annual grassese0
Direction
controllede0
Value
less than 60%e0
Comparator
Without trifluraline0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Without trifluralin, fluridone at 0.1 kg/ha controlled less than 60% of annual grasses or redroot pigweed ( Amaranthus retroflexus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–434 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–298 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluridone alone at 0.1 kg/ha controlled less than 60% of redroot pigweed.

Treatment
fluridone at 0.1 kg/hae0
Interactor
redroot pigweede0weed
Outcome
controlled less than 60% of annual grasses or redroot pigweede0
Direction
controllede0
Value
less than 60%e0
Comparator
Without trifluraline0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Without trifluralin, fluridone at 0.1 kg/ha controlled less than 60% of annual grasses or redroot pigweed ( Amaranthus retroflexus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–434 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–298 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluridone alone at 0.3 kg/ha controlled 90% of annual grasses.

Treatment
0.3-kg/ha ratee0
Interactor
annual grassese1weed
Outcome
controlled 90%e0
Direction
controllede0
Value
90%e0
Comparator
Without trifluraline1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 0.3-kg/ha rate controlled 90%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–473 · show in text ↑
e1

“Without trifluralin, fluridone at 0.1 kg/ha controlled less than 60% of annual grasses or redroot pigweed ( Amaranthus retroflexus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–434 · show in text ↑
e2

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–298 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluridone alone at 0.3 kg/ha controlled 90% of redroot pigweed.

Treatment
0.3-kg/ha ratee0
Interactor
redroot pigweede1weed
Outcome
controlled 90%e0
Direction
controllede0
Value
90%e0
Comparator
Without trifluraline1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 0.3-kg/ha rate controlled 90%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–473 · show in text ↑
e1

“Without trifluralin, fluridone at 0.1 kg/ha controlled less than 60% of annual grasses or redroot pigweed ( Amaranthus retroflexus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–434 · show in text ↑
e2

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–298 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluridone with trifluralin controlled 98% of annual grasses at all fluridone rates.

Treatment
With trifluralin, fluridone at all ratese0
Interactor
annual grassese1weed
Outcome
controlled 98% of these weedse0
Direction
controllede0
Value
98%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With trifluralin, fluridone at all rates controlled 98% of these weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–545 · show in text ↑
e1

“annual grasses or redroot pigweed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–405 · show in text ↑
e2

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–298 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluridone with trifluralin controlled 98% of redroot pigweed at all fluridone rates.

Treatment
With trifluralin, fluridone at all ratese0
Interactor
redroot pigweede1weed
Outcome
controlled 98% of these weedse0
Direction
controllede0
Value
98%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With trifluralin, fluridone at all rates controlled 98% of these weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–545 · show in text ↑
e1

“annual grasses or redroot pigweed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–405 · show in text ↑
e2

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–298 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluridone alone controlled at least 85% of black nightshade.

Treatment
Fluridone alonee0
Interactor
black nightshadeSolanum nigrume0weed
Outcome
controlled 85% or more of black nightshadee0
Direction
controllede0
Value
85% or moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum nigrum
Solanum nigrum · InteractorHladac · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fluridone alone controlled 85% or more of black nightshade ( Solanum nigrum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–626 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–298 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluridone did not alter cotton stand.

Treatment
Fluridonee0
Outcome
cotton stande0
Direction
did not altere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fluridone did not alter cotton stand or yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–673 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluridone did not alter cotton yield.

Treatment
Fluridonee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not altere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fluridone did not alter cotton stand or yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–673 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluridone residues reduced growth of several crops and weeds by at least 75% after eight months.

Taxon
cropse0
Treatment
Fluridone residuese0
Outcome
growth of several crops and weedse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
75% or moree0
Qualifier
8 months after treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Fluridone residues 8 months after treatment reduced growth of several crops and weeds by 75% or more”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–775 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–298 · show in text ↑

Fluridone · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
    Fluridone-treated plots yielded significantly more than untreated and late hand-weeded plots.

    Weed competition and control in irrigated cotton in the Lake Chad Basin, Nigeria · 1987 · compared with untreated plots and plots hand weeded once later than 21 days after crop emergence

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Fluridone · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

trifluralin · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Fluridone · control · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.