Paper · 1987 · Tropical Pest Management

Weed competition and control in irrigated cotton in the Lake Chad Basin, Nigeria

L. I. Okafor

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Two field experiments were conducted at Ngala in the Lake Chad Basin during the wet seasons of 1981 and 1982 to investigate weed competition as well as chemical and manual weed control in irrigated cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) var. Acala 1517C. Pre‐emergence herbicides and their mixtures were tested in replicated, randomized block trials in which the cotton variety was grown 30 cm apart on 90 cm ridges and fertilized with 50 kg N/ha and 40 kg P2O5/ha. The results showed the importance of early weed competition in irrigated cotton. Weed control 14 days after cotton emergence produced optimum growth and yield. Subsequent weeding delay in 7‐day increments restricted crop growth and reduced yield significantly. Unweeded cotton suffered an average yield loss of 82.0%. Yields of plots treated with fluridone at 1.0 kg a.i./ha and fluometuron at 3.0 kg a.i./ha respectively applied 1 to 2 days after sowing were significantly higher than the yield of the untreated plots and plots hand weeded once later than 21 days after crop emergence. Plots hand weeded once however, yielded significantly higher than the untreated plots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control 14 days after emergence produced optimum cotton growth and yield.

Treatment
Weed control 14 days after cotton emergencee0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
optimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed control 14 days after cotton emergence produced optimum growth and yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–626 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Each seven-day delay in weeding restricted cotton growth and significantly reduced yield.

Treatment
weeding delay in 7‐day incrementse0
Outcome
crop growth and reduced yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Subsequent weeding delay in 7‐day increments restricted crop growth and reduced yield significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–727 · show in text ↑
t0

“irrigated cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unweeded cotton lost 82.0% of yield on average.

Outcome
yield losse0
Direction
losse0
Value
82.0%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Unweeded cotton suffered an average yield loss of 82.0%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluridone-treated plots yielded significantly more than untreated and late hand-weeded plots.

Treatment
fluridone at 1.0 kg a.i./hae0
Outcome
Yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
untreated plots and plots hand weeded once later than 21 days after crop emergencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields of plots treated with fluridone at 1.0 kg a.i./ha and fluometuron at 3.0 kg a.i./ha respectively applied 1 to 2 days after sowing were significantly higher than the yield of the untreated plots and plots hand weeded once later than 21 days after crop emergence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–1053 · show in text ↑
t0

“irrigated cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluometuron-treated plots yielded significantly more than untreated and late hand-weeded plots.

Treatment
fluometuron at 3.0 kg a.i./hae0
Outcome
Yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
untreated plots and plots hand weeded once later than 21 days after crop emergencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields of plots treated with fluridone at 1.0 kg a.i./ha and fluometuron at 3.0 kg a.i./ha respectively applied 1 to 2 days after sowing were significantly higher than the yield of the untreated plots and plots hand weeded once later than 21 days after crop emergence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–1053 · show in text ↑
t0

“irrigated cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

One hand weeding significantly increased yield over untreated plots.

Treatment
hand weeded oncee0
Outcome
yieldede0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
untreated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plots hand weeded once however, yielded significantly higher than the untreated plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“irrigated cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–48 · show in text ↑

Fluridone · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fluometuron · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

22 papers: 13 positive, 9 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

herbicide · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

182 papers: 123 positive, 59 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

178 papers more in this group

See all 182 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.