Paper · 1970 · Weed Science

Influence of Weed Competition on Cotton

Gale A. Buchanan; Earl R. Burns

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
138
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) grown at two locations in Alabama from 1966 to 1968 produced maximum yields when kept free of annual weeds for approximately 8 weeks after emergence. Weed control for longer periods failed to increase yields. When initial weed control measures were delayed until 6 to 7 weeks after emergence at one location and 4 to 5 weeks at the other location, cotton was not injured. Prolonged weed competition past the critical periods usually resulted in drastic cotton yield reductions. Plant height and stem diameter of cotton were reduced by some of the weed competition treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton yields were maximal with approximately eight weed-free weeks after emergence.

Treatment
kept free of annual weeds for approximately 8 weeks after emergencee0
Interactor
annual weedse0weed
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
maximume0
Setting
Alabamae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) grown at two locations in Alabama from 1966 to 1968 produced maximum yields when kept free of annual weeds for approximately 8 weeks after emergence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–181 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer weed control did not increase yield.

Treatment
Weed control for longer periodse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
failed to increasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Weed control for longer periods failed to increase yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–240 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying weed control until six to seven weeks at one site did not injure cotton.

Treatment
initial weed control measures were delayed until 6 to 7 weeks after emergencee0
Outcome
cotton was not injurede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When initial weed control measures were delayed until 6 to 7 weeks after emergence at one location and 4 to 5 weeks at the other location, cotton was not injured.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–403 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying weed control until four to five weeks at the other site did not injure cotton.

Treatment
4 to 5 weeks at the other locatione0
Outcome
cotton was not injurede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When initial weed control measures were delayed until 6 to 7 weeks after emergence at one location and 4 to 5 weeks at the other location, cotton was not injured.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–403 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed competition beyond critical periods drastically reduced cotton yield.

Treatment
Prolonged weed competition past the critical periodse0
Outcome
cotton yielde0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prolonged weed competition past the critical periods usually resulted in drastic cotton yield reductions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–509 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some weed-competition treatments reduced cotton height and stem diameter.

Treatment
some of the weed competition treatmentse0
Outcome
Plant height and stem diametere0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant height and stem diameter of cotton were reduced by some of the weed competition treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–607 · show in text ↑

competition · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

16 papers: 2 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

herbicide · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

182 papers: 123 positive, 59 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 123 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    The same HADSS sequence gave equivalent or higher cotton yield than the conventional sequence.

    Economic evaluation of HADSS™ computer program for weed management in nontransgenic and transgenic cotton · 2001 · compared with trifluralin PPI fb fluometuron PRE fb bromoxynil, glyphosate, or pyrithiobac EPOST fb MSMA plus prometryn LAYBY

    Opposite directionCites this paper

  2. positive
  3. positive

178 papers more in this group

See all 182 papers →

competition · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

9 papers: 0 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.