Claim · model-written summary
A residual soil-applied or LAYBY herbicide treatment increased cotton yield compared with glyphosate POST only systems.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Treatment
- a residual soil-applied or LAYBY herbicide treatmente1
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Comparator
- glyphosate POST only systemse1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Weed Management Systems in Glyphosate-Resistant Cotton”
e1“In all herbicide systems, a residual soil-applied or LAYBY herbicide treatment increased yield compared with glyphosate POST only systems”
Title
Weed Management Systems in Glyphosate-Resistant Cotton
Ian C. Burke; Shawn C. Troxler; Shawn D. Askew; et al. Weed Technology 2005. doi:10.1614/wt-04-182r1
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Observation Injury to glyphosate-resistant cotton was less than 5% with all herbicide treatments.
- Intervention effect Glyphosate POST systems were as efficacious in weed control as other herbicide systems.
- Observation Cyanazine plus MSMA LAYBY was usually required for season-long control of common lambsquarters and goosegrass in cotton.
- Intervention effect Glyphosate POST applied as needed gave weed control equivalent to soil-applied plus POST herbicides.
- Intervention effect Glyphosate POST applied as needed slightly reduced lint yield relative to soil-applied plus POST herbicides, depending on location.
- Observation Systems with soil-applied herbicides required one to two glyphosate POST and post-directed treatments.
- Observation Without soil-applied herbicides, two to three glyphosate treatments were required.
- Observation Location influenced weed control and cotton yield.
- Association Generally, yield increased as herbicide inputs increased.