Abstract
Field studies conducted at three locations in North Carolina in 1998 and 1999 evaluated crop tolerance, weed control, and yield with CGA-362622 alone and in combination with various weed management systems in transgenic and nontransgenic cotton systems. The herbicide systems used bromoxynil, CGA-362622, glyphosate, and pyrithiobac applied alone early postemergence (EPOST) or mixtures of CGA-362622 plus bromoxynil, glyphosate, or pyrithiobac applied EPOST. Trifluralin preplant incorporated followed by (fb) fluometuron preemergence (PRE) alone or fb a late POST–directed (LAYBY) treatment of prometryn plus MSMA controlled all the weed species present less than 90%. Herbicide systems that included soil-applied and LAYBY herbicides plus glyphosate EPOST or mixtures of CGA-362622 EPOST plus bromoxynil, glyphosate, or pyrithiobac controlled broadleaf signalgrass, entireleaf morningglory, large crabgrass, Palmer amaranth, prickly sida, sicklepod, and smooth pigweed at least 90%. Only cotton treated with these herbicide systems yielded equivalent to the weed-free check for each cultivar. Bromoxynil systems did not control Palmer amaranth and sicklepod, pyrithiobac systems did not control sicklepod, and CGA-362622 systems did not control prickly sida.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
The trifluralin–fluometuron program controlled all present weed species below 90%.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Treatment
- Trifluralin preplant incorporated followed by (fb) fluometuron preemergence (PRE)e0
- Outcome
- all the weed species presente0
- Direction
- less thane0
- Value
- 90%e0
Not reportedComparatorSetting
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Trifluralin preplant incorporated followed by (fb) fluometuron preemergence (PRE) alone or fb a late POST–directed (LAYBY) treatment of prometryn plus MSMA controlled all the weed species present less than 90%”
t0“cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Systems with soil-applied and layby herbicides plus glyphosate controlled the listed weeds at least 90%.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- soil-applied and LAYBY herbicides plus glyphosate EPOSTe0
- Outcome
- broadleaf signalgrass, entireleaf morningglory, large crabgrass, Palmer amaranth, prickly sida, sicklepod, and smooth pigweede0
- Direction
- controllede0
- Value
- at least 90%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Herbicide systems that included soil-applied and LAYBY herbicides plus glyphosate EPOST or mixtures of CGA-362622 EPOST plus bromoxynil, glyphosate, or pyrithiobac controlled broadleaf signalgrass, entireleaf morningglory, large crabgrass, Palmer amaranth, prickly sida, sicklepod, and smooth pigweed at least 90%”
t0“cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
CGA-362622 mixtures with bromoxynil, glyphosate or pyrithiobac controlled the listed weeds at least 90%.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- mixtures of CGA-362622 EPOST plus bromoxynil, glyphosate, or pyrithiobace0
- Outcome
- broadleaf signalgrass, entireleaf morningglory, large crabgrass, Palmer amaranth, prickly sida, sicklepod, and smooth pigweede0
- Direction
- controllede0
- Value
- at least 90%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“mixtures of CGA-362622 EPOST plus bromoxynil, glyphosate, or pyrithiobac controlled broadleaf signalgrass, entireleaf morningglory, large crabgrass, Palmer amaranth, prickly sida, sicklepod, and smooth pigweed at least 90%”
t0“cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Only cotton under those herbicide systems yielded equivalently to the weed-free check.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume0
- Treatment
- these herbicide systemse0
- Outcome
- yieldede0
- Direction
- equivalente0
- Qualifier
- for each cultivare0
- Comparator
- weed-free checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Only cotton treated with these herbicide systems yielded equivalent to the weed-free check for each cultivar”
Claim · model-written summary
Bromoxynil systems failed to control Palmer amaranth.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- Bromoxynil systemse0
- Outcome
- Palmer amaranthe0
- Direction
- did not controle0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Bromoxynil systems did not control Palmer amaranth and sicklepod”
t0“cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Bromoxynil systems failed to control sicklepod.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- Bromoxynil systemse0
- Outcome
- sicklepode0
- Direction
- did not controle0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Bromoxynil systems did not control Palmer amaranth and sicklepod”
t0“cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
Pyrithiobac systems failed to control sicklepod.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- pyrithiobac systemse0
- Outcome
- sicklepode0
- Direction
- did not controle0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“pyrithiobac systems did not control sicklepod”
t0“cotton”
Claim · model-written summary
CGA-362622 systems failed to control prickly sida.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- CGA-362622 systemse0
- Outcome
- prickly sidae0
- Direction
- did not controle0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“CGA-362622 systems did not control prickly sida”
t0“cotton”
The same questions in other papers
glyphosate · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →fluometuron · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →trifluralin · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- positive
- no effect
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrile · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
herbicide · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- positive
- positive
31 papers more in this group
See all 35 papers →herbicide · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
99 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- positive
104 papers more in this group
See all 108 papers →herbicide · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
178 papers more in this group
See all 182 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.