Paper · 1977 · Weed Science

Competition of Prickly Sida with Cotton

G.A. Buchanan; R.H. Crowley; R.D. McLaughlin

10
claims
10
verbatim quotes
45
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Seed cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) yields were not reduced when competing with prickly sida ( Sida spinosa L.) for 7 weeks or less after cotton emergence and maintained weed-free for the remainder of the season. Cotton yields were not affected when pure prickly sida stands were controlled for 5 to 6 weeks after cotton emergence and then allowed to grow uncontrolled for the remainder of the season. In the more severe weed competition treatments, cotton plant height and main stem diameter were reduced; however, yield of seed cotton was the most sensitive indicator of prickly sida competition. Maturity of cotton, as measured by percent of total yield obtained at first picking, indicated a delay in maturity in 1 of 3 yr in treatments where competing prickly sida was present for 8 weeks or more. In density studies, where prickly sida emerged with cotton and was allowed to compete for the full growing season, 45 prickly sida plants/15 m of row caused reductions in yield of seed cotton in two of five experiments. In another series of three experiments as few as 32 prickly sida plants/15 m of row significantly reduced seed cotton yields in two of the three experiments. Trash content of machine-harvested cotton was increased at densities of 64 and 128 prickly sida plants/15 m of row in one experiment. Staple length and grade of cotton were not affected by any weed density studied. Micronaire measurements of cotton were reduced at prickly sida densities of 64 and 128 weeds/15 m of row during 1972.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed cotton yield was not reduced when cotton competed with prickly sida for 7 weeks or less after emergence and was kept weed-free thereafter.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
competing with prickly sidae1
Interactor
prickly sidae1weed
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
not reducede1
Qualifier
for 7 weeks or less after cotton emergencee1
Comparator
maintained weed-freee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Seed cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) yields were not reduced when competing with prickly sida ( Sida spinosa L.) for 7 weeks or less after cotton emergence and maintained weed-free for the remainder of the season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–212 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton yield was not affected when pure prickly sida stands were controlled for 5 to 6 weeks after emergence and then left uncontrolled for the rest of the season.

Treatment
pure prickly sida stands were controlled for 5 to 6 weekse1
Interactor
prickly sidae1weed
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
not affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Cotton yields were not affected when pure prickly sida stands were controlled for 5 to 6 weeks after cotton emergence and then allowed to grow uncontrolled for the remainder of the season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under more severe weed competition, cotton plant height and main stem diameter were reduced.

Treatment
more severe weed competition treatmentse1
Outcome
cotton plant height and main stem diametere1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In the more severe weed competition treatments, cotton plant height and main stem diameter were reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–506 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed cotton yield was the most sensitive indicator of prickly sida competition among the measured traits.

Interactor
prickly sidae1weed
Outcome
yield of seed cottone1
Qualifier
most sensitive indicator of prickly sida competitione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“yield of seed cotton was the most sensitive indicator of prickly sida competition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–598 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prickly sida present for 8 weeks or more delayed cotton maturity in 1 of 3 years.

Treatment
competing prickly sida was present for 8 weeks or moree1
Interactor
prickly sidae1weed
Outcome
Maturity of cottone1
Direction
delaye1
Qualifier
in 1 of 3 yre1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Maturity of cotton, as measured by percent of total yield obtained at first picking, indicated a delay in maturity in 1 of 3 yr in treatments where competing prickly sida was present for 8 weeks or more”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–802 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A density of 45 prickly sida plants per 15 m of row reduced seed cotton yield in two of five experiments.

Treatment
45 prickly sida plants/15 m of rowe1
Interactor
prickly sidae1weed
Outcome
yield of seed cottone1
Direction
reductionse1
Qualifier
in two of five experimentse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“45 prickly sida plants/15 m of row caused reductions in yield of seed cotton in two of five experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1022 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

As few as 32 prickly sida plants per 15 m of row significantly reduced seed cotton yield in two of three experiments.

Treatment
32 prickly sida plants/15 m of rowe1
Interactor
prickly sidae1weed
Outcome
seed cotton yieldse1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
in two of the three experimentse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In another series of three experiments as few as 32 prickly sida plants/15 m of row significantly reduced seed cotton yields in two of the three experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1180 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trash content of machine-harvested cotton increased at prickly sida densities of 64 and 128 plants per 15 m of row in one experiment.

Treatment
densities of 64 and 128 prickly sida plants/15 m of rowe1
Interactor
prickly sidae1weed
Outcome
Trash content of machine-harvested cottone1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
in one experimente1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Trash content of machine-harvested cotton was increased at densities of 64 and 128 prickly sida plants/15 m of row in one experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1314 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Staple length and grade of cotton were not affected by any weed density studied.

Treatment
weed densitye1
Outcome
Staple length and grade of cottone1
Direction
not affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Staple length and grade of cotton were not affected by any weed density studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1395 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronaire of cotton was reduced at prickly sida densities of 64 and 128 weeds per 15 m of row during 1972.

Treatment
prickly sida densities of 64 and 128 weeds/15 m of rowe1
Interactor
prickly sidae1weed
Outcome
Micronaire measurementse1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
during 1972e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Micronaire measurements of cotton were reduced at prickly sida densities of 64 and 128 weeds/15 m of row during 1972”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1397–1513 · show in text ↑

competition · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

competition · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

9 papers: 0 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.