Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Weed growth, yield and nutrient uptake in maize (Zea mays) as influenced by tillage, seed rate and weed control method

C.K. SARMA; R.C. GAUTAM

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
11
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during kharif seasons of 2004 and 2005 at Pantnagar to study the effect of two tillage, three seed rate and four weed control methods on weed growth, yield and nutrient uptake in maize ( Zea mays L.). There was significant increase in grain yield with conventional tillage (23.5% on mean basis) due to reduced population and dry weight of weeds when compared with no-tillage (3.69 t/ha). Grain yield recorded with 24 kg seed/ha was significantly higher (10%) when compared with the yield recorded with 16 kg seed/ ha in 2005. However, net returns were higher in maize sown with a seed rate of 24 kg/ha in both the years. Similarly, two hand weedings at 25 and 45 days after sowing (DAS) recorded significantly higher grain yield (26% in 2004 and 68% in 2005) and nutrient uptake and reduced the population and dry weight of weeds as compared to weedy check. Two hand weedings at 25 and 45 DAS with higher seed rate (24 kg/ha) under tilled condition ap- peared to be the best in producing yield of maize, reducing weed growth and for enhanced profits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage increased maize grain yield by 23.5% on average over no tillage.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays)Zea mayst0
Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
23.5%e0
Qualifier
3.69 t/hae0
Comparator
no-tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“significant increase in grain yield with conventional tillage (23.5% on mean basis) due to reduced population and dry weight of weeds when compared with no-tillage (3.69 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–419 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage reduced weed population and dry weight relative to no tillage.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays)Zea mayst0
Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
population and dry weight of weedse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
no-tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“conventional tillage (23.5% on mean basis) due to reduced population and dry weight of weeds when compared with no-tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–407 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing 24 kg seed/ha increased 2005 maize grain yield by 10% over 16 kg seed/ ha.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays)Zea mayst0
Treatment
24 kg seed/hae0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
10%e0
Qualifier
in 2005e0
Comparator
16 kg seed/ hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“Grain yield recorded with 24 kg seed/ha was significantly higher (10%) when compared with the yield recorded with 16 kg seed/ ha in 2005”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–557 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 24 kg/ha maize seed rate produced higher net returns in both years.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays)Zea mayst0
Treatment
seed rate of 24 kg/hae0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
in both the yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“net returns were higher in maize sown with a seed rate of 24 kg/ha in both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–652 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings increased maize grain yield by 26% in 2004 relative to a weedy check.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays)Zea mayst0
Treatment
two hand weedings at 25 and 45 days after sowing (DAS)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
26%e0
Qualifier
in 2004e0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“two hand weedings at 25 and 45 days after sowing (DAS) recorded significantly higher grain yield (26% in 2004 and 68% in 2005) and nutrient uptake and reduced the population and dry weight of weeds as compared to weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings increased maize grain yield by 68% in 2005 relative to a weedy check.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays)Zea mayst0
Treatment
two hand weedings at 25 and 45 days after sowing (DAS)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
68%e0
Qualifier
in 2005e0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“two hand weedings at 25 and 45 days after sowing (DAS) recorded significantly higher grain yield (26% in 2004 and 68% in 2005) and nutrient uptake and reduced the population and dry weight of weeds as compared to weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings increased maize nutrient uptake relative to a weedy check.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays)Zea mayst0
Treatment
two hand weedings at 25 and 45 days after sowing (DAS)e0
Outcome
nutrient uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“two hand weedings at 25 and 45 days after sowing (DAS) recorded significantly higher grain yield (26% in 2004 and 68% in 2005) and nutrient uptake and reduced the population and dry weight of weeds as compared to weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings reduced weed population and dry weight relative to a weedy check.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays)Zea mayst0
Treatment
two hand weedings at 25 and 45 days after sowing (DAS)e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
population and dry weight of weedse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“two hand weedings at 25 and 45 days after sowing (DAS) recorded significantly higher grain yield (26% in 2004 and 68% in 2005) and nutrient uptake and reduced the population and dry weight of weeds as compared to weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–889 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identify two hand weedings with a 24 kg/ha seed rate under tillage as the best combination for maize yield, weed control and profit.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays)Zea mayst0
Treatment
Two hand weedings at 25 and 45 DAS with higher seed rate (24 kg/ha) under tilled conditione0
Outcome
best in producing yield of maize, reducing weed growth and for enhanced profitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“Two hand weedings at 25 and 45 DAS with higher seed rate (24 kg/ha) under tilled condition ap- peared to be the best in producing yield of maize, reducing weed growth and for enhanced profits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1082 · show in text ↑

tillage · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

111 papers: 65 positive, 46 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

density · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

658 papers: 519 positive, 139 negative or no effect

518 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

654 papers more in this group

See all 658 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.