Abstract
The experiment was conducted in rabi season during the year 2000–2001 at Horticultural Research Farm at IGKV, Raipur (CG). There were 18 different plant growth regulators treatments comprising of two PGR (GA and NAA) each in three doses (20, 40, and 60 ppm of GA3 and 200,300 and 400 ppm of NAA) and applied through three different application methods (seed soaking, root dipping and foliar spray). Results indicates that growth characters viz., plant height, leaf length and culm width were influenced by different doses and application methods of PGRs. Root dipping with GA3 40 or 60 ppm was found superior than other treatments for above characters. Number of leaves, culm length, bulb length and bulb diameter were not influenced by different treatments. Root dipping with GA3 at 20 ppm produced highest bulb weight (43.90 g). Marketable yield and total yield of onion bulb were significantly higher in root dipping with GA3 at 40 ppm followed by root dipping with GA3 at 60 and at 20 ppm treatments.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Root dipping with GA3 at 40 or 60 ppm was superior to other treatments for plant height, leaf length and culm width of onion.
- Taxon
- onion
Allium cepat0 - Treatment
- Root dipping with GA3 40 or 60 ppme1
- Outcome
- plant height, leaf length and culm widthe0
- Direction
- superiore1
- Comparator
- other treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“growth and yield of onion (Allium cepa L.)”
e0“growth characters viz., plant height, leaf length and culm width were influenced by different doses and application methods of PGRs”
e1“Root dipping with GA3 40 or 60 ppm was found superior than other treatments for above characters”
Claim · model-written summary
Number of leaves, culm length, bulb length and bulb diameter of onion were not influenced by the treatments.
- Taxon
- onionAllium cepat0
- Treatment
- different treatmentse2
- Outcome
- Number of leaves, culm length, bulb length and bulb diametere2
- Direction
- not influencede2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“growth and yield of onion (Allium cepa L.)”
e2“Number of leaves, culm length, bulb length and bulb diameter were not influenced by different treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Root dipping with GA3 at 20 ppm gave the highest onion bulb weight, 43.90 g.
- Taxon
- onionAllium cepat0
- Treatment
- Root dipping with GA3 at 20 ppme3
- Outcome
- bulb weighte3
- Direction
- higheste3
- Value
- 43.90 ge3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“growth and yield of onion (Allium cepa L.)”
e3“Root dipping with GA3 at 20 ppm produced highest bulb weight (43.90 g)”
Claim · model-written summary
Root dipping with GA3 at 40 ppm significantly increased marketable and total bulb yield of onion over the 60 and 20 ppm treatments.
- Taxon
- onionAllium cepat0
- Treatment
- root dipping with GA3 at 40 ppme4
- Outcome
- Marketable yield and total yielde4
- Direction
- significantly highere4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“growth and yield of onion (Allium cepa L.)”
e4“Marketable yield and total yield of onion bulb were significantly higher in root dipping with GA3 at 40 ppm followed by root dipping with GA3 at 60 and at 20 ppm treatments”
The same questions in other papers
Gibberellic acid · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ
24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- negative
26 papers more in this group
See all 30 papers →application · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results
69 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
70 papers more in this group
See all 74 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.