Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during rainy (kharif) seasons of 2006–08 to study the response of different genotypes of capsicum (Capsicum annuum L.) grown under mulch and without mulch for growth, yield and quality attributes at high hills of Garhwal region. Varietal differences were prominent at both situations. Plant growth and fruit yield of genotypes significantly improved with mulching. Plant height varied from 32.27 cm (‘Miety’) to 38.15 cm (‘Orobelle’) under mulch and 26.20 cm (‘Miety’) to 33.15 cm (‘Bomby’) under non- mulch conditions. Mulch induced earliness by advancing the crop by 26 days (‘California Wonder’, ‘Miety’, ‘Orobelle’ and ‘Green Beauty’) to 38 days (‘Tanvi’). Harvest duration was extended by 29 days (‘California Wonder’ and ‘Green Beauty’) to 50 days (‘McKong’) under mulch. Differences in the incidence of collar rot (Phytophthora capsici Leonian) were observed among the genotypes as well as between the treatments. It ranged from 1.15 (‘Orobelle’) to 5.00% (‘Bomby’) and 4.75 (‘Green Beauty’) to 14.50% (‘Bomby’) under mulch and without mulch treatments, respectively. Increase in yield over unmulched varied from 3.06 (‘Miety’) to 19.07% (‘Green Beauty’).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Varietal differences in capsicum were prominent both under mulch and without mulch.
CapsicumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted during rainy (kharif) seasons of 2006–08 to study the response of different genotypes of capsicum (Capsicum annuum L.) grown under mulch and without mulch for growth, yield and quality attributes at high hills of Garhwal region”
e1“Varietal differences were prominent at both situations”
Claim · model-written summary
Mulching significantly improved plant growth and fruit yield of capsicum genotypes.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted during rainy (kharif) seasons of 2006–08 to study the response of different genotypes of capsicum (Capsicum annuum L.) grown under mulch and without mulch for growth, yield and quality attributes at high hills of Garhwal region”
e2“Plant growth and fruit yield of genotypes significantly improved with mulching”
Claim · model-written summary
Under mulch, plant height of capsicum genotypes ranged from 32.27 cm to 38.15 cm.
- Treatment
- under mulche3
- Outcome
- Plant heighte3
- Value
- 32.27 cme3
- Qualifier
- to 38.15 cm (‘Orobelle’) under mulche3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted during rainy (kharif) seasons of 2006–08 to study the response of different genotypes of capsicum (Capsicum annuum L.) grown under mulch and without mulch for growth, yield and quality attributes at high hills of Garhwal region”
e3“Plant height varied from 32.27 cm (‘Miety’) to 38.15 cm (‘Orobelle’) under mulch and 26.20 cm (‘Miety’) to 33.15 cm (‘Bomby’) under non- mulch conditions”
Claim · model-written summary
Without mulch, plant height of capsicum genotypes ranged from 26.20 cm to 33.15 cm.
- Treatment
- non- mulch conditionse3
- Outcome
- Plant heighte3
- Value
- 26.20 cme3
- Qualifier
- to 33.15 cm (‘Bomby’) under non- mulch conditionse3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted during rainy (kharif) seasons of 2006–08 to study the response of different genotypes of capsicum (Capsicum annuum L.) grown under mulch and without mulch for growth, yield and quality attributes at high hills of Garhwal region”
e3“Plant height varied from 32.27 cm (‘Miety’) to 38.15 cm (‘Orobelle’) under mulch and 26.20 cm (‘Miety’) to 33.15 cm (‘Bomby’) under non- mulch conditions”
Claim · model-written summary
Mulch advanced capsicum earliness by 26 days, up to 38 days in some genotypes.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted during rainy (kharif) seasons of 2006–08 to study the response of different genotypes of capsicum (Capsicum annuum L.) grown under mulch and without mulch for growth, yield and quality attributes at high hills of Garhwal region”
e4“Mulch induced earliness by advancing the crop by 26 days (‘California Wonder’, ‘Miety’, ‘Orobelle’ and ‘Green Beauty’) to 38 days (‘Tanvi’)”
Claim · model-written summary
Mulch extended harvest duration of capsicum by 29 days, up to 50 days in some genotypes.
- Treatment
- under mulche5
- Outcome
- Harvest duratione5
- Direction
- extendede5
- Value
- 29 dayse5
- Qualifier
- to 50 days (‘McKong’) under mulche5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted during rainy (kharif) seasons of 2006–08 to study the response of different genotypes of capsicum (Capsicum annuum L.) grown under mulch and without mulch for growth, yield and quality attributes at high hills of Garhwal region”
e5“Harvest duration was extended by 29 days (‘California Wonder’ and ‘Green Beauty’) to 50 days (‘McKong’) under mulch”
Claim · model-written summary
Collar rot incidence in capsicum differed among genotypes and between mulch treatments.
- Interactor
- Phytophthora capsici
.jpg?width=60)
Phytophthora capsicie6pathogen - Outcome
- incidence of collar rote6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted during rainy (kharif) seasons of 2006–08 to study the response of different genotypes of capsicum (Capsicum annuum L.) grown under mulch and without mulch for growth, yield and quality attributes at high hills of Garhwal region”
e6“Differences in the incidence of collar rot (Phytophthora capsici Leonian) were observed among the genotypes as well as between the treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Under mulch, collar rot incidence in capsicum ranged from 1.15% to 5.00%.
- Treatment
- under mulche7
- Interactor
- Phytophthora capsiciPhytophthora capsicie6pathogen
- Outcome
- incidence of collar rote6
- Value
- 5.00%e7
- Qualifier
- 1.15 (‘Orobelle’) to 5.00% (‘Bomby’)e7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted during rainy (kharif) seasons of 2006–08 to study the response of different genotypes of capsicum (Capsicum annuum L.) grown under mulch and without mulch for growth, yield and quality attributes at high hills of Garhwal region”
e6“Differences in the incidence of collar rot (Phytophthora capsici Leonian) were observed among the genotypes as well as between the treatments”
e7“It ranged from 1.15 (‘Orobelle’) to 5.00% (‘Bomby’) and 4.75 (‘Green Beauty’) to 14.50% (‘Bomby’) under mulch and without mulch treatments, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Without mulch, collar rot incidence in capsicum ranged from 4.75% to 14.50%.
- Treatment
- without mulche7
- Interactor
- Phytophthora capsiciPhytophthora capsicie6pathogen
- Outcome
- incidence of collar rote6
- Value
- 14.50%e7
- Qualifier
- 4.75 (‘Green Beauty’) to 14.50% (‘Bomby’)e7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted during rainy (kharif) seasons of 2006–08 to study the response of different genotypes of capsicum (Capsicum annuum L.) grown under mulch and without mulch for growth, yield and quality attributes at high hills of Garhwal region”
e6“Differences in the incidence of collar rot (Phytophthora capsici Leonian) were observed among the genotypes as well as between the treatments”
e7“It ranged from 1.15 (‘Orobelle’) to 5.00% (‘Bomby’) and 4.75 (‘Green Beauty’) to 14.50% (‘Bomby’) under mulch and without mulch treatments, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Mulch increased capsicum yield over unmulched plots by 3.06% to 19.07% depending on genotype.
- Treatment
- mulche7
- Outcome
- yielde7
- Direction
- Increasee7
- Value
- 19.07%e7
- Qualifier
- 3.06 (‘Miety’) to 19.07% (‘Green Beauty’)e7
- Comparator
- unmulchede7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted during rainy (kharif) seasons of 2006–08 to study the response of different genotypes of capsicum (Capsicum annuum L.) grown under mulch and without mulch for growth, yield and quality attributes at high hills of Garhwal region”
e7“Increase in yield over unmulched varied from 3.06 (‘Miety’) to 19.07% (‘Green Beauty’)”
The same questions in other papers
mulching · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results differ
38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
37 papers more in this group
See all 41 papers →mulching · phenology · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.