Paper · 2013

Pemberian Mulsa dalam Budidaya Cabai Rawit di Lahan Kering: Dampaknya terhadap Hasil Tanaman dan Aliran Permukaan Application of Mulch in Chilli Cultivation at Upland Area: The Impact on Crop Yield and Runoff`

Nani Heryani; Budi Kartiwa; Yon Sugiarto; et al.

8
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The problem of plant cultivation in dry upland with slope of >15° is the high soil erosion that result in high rate of sedimentation in the downstream of watershed. One way of overcoming this problem is by utilization of mulches. The objective of the experiment was to study the effect of mulch application on growth and yield of chilli (Capsicum frutescens L.). The experiment was conducted from January 2010 until June 2011 at Selopamioro micro watershed at Imogiri Subdistrict, Bantul District, Special Region of Yogyakarta. The experiment was arranged in a randomized complete block design consisted of four mulch treatments (rice straw, litter, plastic/silver black polyethylene, and without mulch) and four replications. The observed variables were the growth parameter (plant height), soil moisture content, soil temperature, and yield (number and weight of chilli). The result showed that application of mulches did not affect plant height and yield of chilli, but increased number of fruit. The best mulch for chilli crops in upland area was rice straw, that yielded the highest increase in number of fruit. Mulch as a soil conservation practice reduced runoff coefficient, while dicharge and extended of the reponse time were reduced only at rainfall less than 21 mm.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch application did not affect chilli plant height.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
mulchese0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
did not affecte0
Comparator
without mulche1

Verbatim

e0

“application of mulches did not affect plant height and yield of chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–967 · show in text ↑
e1

“without mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–702 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch application did not affect chilli yield.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
mulchese0
Outcome
yield of chillie0
Direction
did not affecte0
Comparator
without mulche1

Verbatim

e0

“application of mulches did not affect plant height and yield of chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–967 · show in text ↑
e1

“without mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–702 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch application increased chilli fruit number.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
mulchese0
Outcome
number of fruite0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
without mulche1

Verbatim

e0

“application of mulches did not affect plant height and yield of chilli, but increased number of fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–998 · show in text ↑
e1

“without mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–702 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice straw yielded the highest increase in chilli fruit number.

Taxon
chillie2
Treatment
rice strawe0
Outcome
number of fruite0
Direction
highest increasee0
Comparator
without mulche1

Verbatim

e0

“rice straw, that yielded the highest increase in number of fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1115 · show in text ↑
e1

“without mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–702 · show in text ↑
e2

“chilli crops in upland area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1046 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch reduced the runoff coefficient.

Taxon
chillie2
Treatment
Mulche0
Outcome
runoff coefficiente0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
without mulche1

Verbatim

e0

“Mulch as a soil conservation practice reduced runoff coefficient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1181 · show in text ↑
e1

“without mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–702 · show in text ↑
e2

“chilli crops in upland area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1046 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch reduced discharge only when rainfall was below 21 mm.

Taxon
chillie3
Treatment
Mulche1
Outcome
dichargee0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
rainfall less than 21 mme0
Comparator
without mulche2

Verbatim

e0

“dicharge and extended of the reponse time were reduced only at rainfall less than 21 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1276 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mulch as a soil conservation practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1154 · show in text ↑
e2

“without mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–702 · show in text ↑
e3

“chilli crops in upland area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1046 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch reduced response time only when rainfall was below 21 mm.

Taxon
chillie3
Treatment
Mulche1
Outcome
reponse timee0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
rainfall less than 21 mme0
Comparator
without mulche2

Verbatim

e0

“dicharge and extended of the reponse time were reduced only at rainfall less than 21 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1276 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mulch as a soil conservation practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1154 · show in text ↑
e2

“without mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–702 · show in text ↑
e3

“chilli crops in upland area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1046 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Rice straw was recommended as the best mulch for upland chilli.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
rice strawe0
Outcome
best mulche0

Verbatim

e0

“The best mulch for chilli crops in upland area was rice straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1061 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results differ

41 papers: 39 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

mulching · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

mulching · soil: physics · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.