Paper · 2008 · Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science

Effect of straw mulching, irrigation and fertilizer nitrogen levels on soil hydrothermal regime, water use and yield of hybrid chilli

Nirmal Kaur Sekhon; Chandra Bhushan Singh; Ajmer Singh Sidhu; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
24
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In northern India, chilli is transplanted in the hot and dry months of February and March when the crop depends upon irrigation water for canopy establishment. Hybrid chilli may require more irrigation water and fertilizer N due to its higher yield potential but the problem of the depleting groundwater table in the region necessitates developing a technique for reducing water requirement. Rice residue mulching can lower soil temperature and reduce evaporation losses from soil. An experiment was conducted on sandy loam soil for three years to evaluate the effect of rice straw mulch @ 6 Mg ha−1 on yield, fertilizer N and irrigation water requirement of hybrid chilli. Maximum and minimum soil temperatures at 50 mm depth during 2003 were lowered up to 8.9 and 2.2°C, respectively, by rice residue mulching. Mulching improved fresh red chilli yield by 2.4 Mg ha−1 and required 120 mm less irrigation water. Substantial yield increase with mulching may be attributed to favourable soil hydrothermal regime as evident from lower soil temperature, higher profile moisture (12 mm) and 13.5 Mg ha−1 lower weed biomass. Chilli yield obtained with 45 kg N ha−1 with mulch was the same as that of 75 kg N ha−1 without mulch. Ascorbic acid content decreased with lower irrigation frequency but was significantly higher without mulch.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice residue mulch lowered maximum soil temperature at 50 mm by up to 8.9°C.

Taxon
hybrid chillit0
Treatment
rice residue mulchinge0
Outcome
soil temperaturese0
Direction
lowerede0
Value
8.9e0

Not reportedOrgan / stageComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum and minimum soil temperatures at 50 mm depth during 2003 were lowered up to 8.9 and 2.2°C, respectively, by rice residue mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–811 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice residue mulch lowered minimum soil temperature at 50 mm by up to 2.2°C.

Taxon
hybrid chillit0
Treatment
rice residue mulchinge0
Outcome
minimum soil temperaturese0
Direction
lowerede0
Value
2.2°Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum and minimum soil temperatures at 50 mm depth during 2003 were lowered up to 8.9 and 2.2°C, respectively, by rice residue mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–811 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching increased fresh red chilli yield by 2.4 Mg ha−1.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
Mulchinge0
Outcome
fresh red chilli yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
2.4 Mg ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Mulching improved fresh red chilli yield by 2.4 Mg ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–868 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching required 120 mm less irrigation water.

Taxon
hybrid chillit0
Treatment
Mulchinge0
Outcome
irrigation watere0
Direction
lesse0
Value
120 mme0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Mulching improved fresh red chilli yield by 2.4 Mg ha−1 and required 120 mm less irrigation water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–910 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching increased soil profile moisture by 12 mm.

Taxon
hybrid chillit0
Treatment
mulchinge1
Outcome
profile moisturee0
Direction
highere0
Value
12 mme0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“higher profile moisture (12 mm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1081 · show in text ↑
e1

“with mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–952 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching lowered weed biomass by 13.5 Mg ha−1.

Taxon
hybrid chillit0
Treatment
mulchinge1
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed biomasse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
13.5 Mg ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“13.5 Mg ha−1 lower weed biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1117 · show in text ↑
e1

“with mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–952 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilli yield with 45 kg N ha−1 plus mulch was the same as with 75 kg N ha−1 without mulch.

Taxon
Chillie0
Treatment
45 kg N ha−1 with mulche0
Outcome
Chilli yielde0
Direction
the samee0
Comparator
75 kg N ha−1 without mulche0

Verbatim

e0

“Chilli yield obtained with 45 kg N ha−1 with mulch was the same as that of 75 kg N ha−1 without mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1220 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower irrigation frequency decreased chilli ascorbic acid content.

Taxon
hybrid chillit0
Treatment
lower irrigation frequencye0
Outcome
Ascorbic acid contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Ascorbic acid content decreased with lower irrigation frequency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1285 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilli ascorbic acid content was significantly higher without mulch.

Taxon
hybrid chillit0
Treatment
without mulche0
Outcome
Ascorbic acid contente0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Ascorbic acid content decreased with lower irrigation frequency but was significantly higher without mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1328 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–133 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results differ

41 papers: 39 positive, 2 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

irrigation · quality: phytochemicals · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

mulching · weed · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 31 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

mulching · quality: phytochemicals · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mulching · physiology: water · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

mulching · soil: physics · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.