Paper · 2021 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Effects of mulching and irrigation levels on greenhouse capsicum (Capsicum annuum)

LAULINA KUMARI; MURTAZA HASAN; R D RANDHE; et al.

10
claims
25
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The experiment was conducted during 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-16 under naturally ventilated greenhouse condition at Centre for Protected Cultivation Technology (CPCT), ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi. The capsicum (Capsicum annuum L.) variety California Wonder was planted under colored plastic mulches (silver, yellow and black) and non-mulched (control) condition in combination with three levels of irrigation, viz. 100%, 80%, and 60% ETc.. The yield of capsicum was observed significantly higher under silver mulch (63-71.6 t/ha) followed by yellow mulch (60.04-67.04 t/ha) at 100% ETc and silver mulch (59.72-70.8 t/ha) at 80% ETc for three consecutive years. Growth parameters were significantly affected by different combination of treatments. The highest and lowest plant height (149.9 cm and 56.5 cm), leaf area (1.98 m2/m2 and 1.09 m2/m2) and total dry matter (120.4 g and 57 g) were observed under silver mulch with 100% and non-mulched with 60% ETc respectively during all the three years of experiment. Highest growth parameters were at par with silver mulch with 80% ETc treatment. Significantly higher crop water productivity (43.30-36.53 kg/m3) in silver mulch with 80 % ETc treatment was observed compared to other combination of treatments. The results revealed that, capsicum cultivation under silver coloured plastic mulch in the naturally ventilated greenhouse not only saved irrigation water but also enhanced yield, crop growth and crop water productivity at reduced level of irrigation (80% ETc). Silver colour plastic mulch was found to be best suitable for growing capsicum crop inside the naturally ventilated greenhouse.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silver mulch at 100% ETc produced significantly higher capsicum yield of 63-71.6 t/ha.

Taxon
capsicumCapsicume0
Material
California Wondere1
Treatment
silver mulche0
Outcome
yield of capsicume0
Direction
highere0
Value
63-71.6 t/hae0
Qualifier
100% ETce0
Comparator
yellow mulche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield of capsicum was observed significantly higher under silver mulch (63-71.6 t/ha) followed by yellow mulch (60.04-67.04 t/ha) at 100% ETc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–619 · show in text ↑
e1

“The capsicum (Capsicum annuum L.) variety California Wonder was planted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–302 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yellow mulch at 100% ETc yielded 60.04-67.04 t/ha.

Taxon
capsicumCapsicumt0
Treatment
yellow mulche0
Outcome
yellow mulche0
Value
60.04-67.04 t/hae0
Qualifier
100% ETce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yellow mulch (60.04-67.04 t/ha) at 100% ETc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–619 · show in text ↑
e1

“The capsicum (Capsicum annuum L.) variety California Wonder was planted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–302 · show in text ↑
t0

“capsicum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silver mulch at 80% ETc yielded 59.72-70.8 t/ha.

Taxon
capsicumCapsicumt0
Treatment
silver mulche0
Outcome
silver mulche0
Value
59.72-70.8 t/hae0
Qualifier
80% ETce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“silver mulch (59.72-70.8 t/ha) at 80% ETc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–665 · show in text ↑
e1

“The capsicum (Capsicum annuum L.) variety California Wonder was planted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–302 · show in text ↑
t0

“capsicum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height was highest at 149.9 cm under silver mulch with 100% ETc.

Taxon
capsicumCapsicumt0
Treatment
silver mulch with 100%e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
149.9 cme0
Qualifier
56.5 cme0
Comparator
non-mulched with 60% ETce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest and lowest plant height (149.9 cm and 56.5 cm), leaf area (1.98 m2/m2 and 1.09 m2/m2) and total dry matter (120.4 g and 57 g) were observed under silver mulch with 100% and non-mulched with 60% ETc respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–1003 · show in text ↑
e1

“The capsicum (Capsicum annuum L.) variety California Wonder was planted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–302 · show in text ↑
t0

“capsicum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area was highest at 1.98 m2/m2 under silver mulch with 100% ETc.

Taxon
capsicumCapsicumt0
Treatment
silver mulch with 100%e0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.98 m2/m2e0
Qualifier
1.09 m2/m2e0
Comparator
non-mulched with 60% ETce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest and lowest plant height (149.9 cm and 56.5 cm), leaf area (1.98 m2/m2 and 1.09 m2/m2) and total dry matter (120.4 g and 57 g) were observed under silver mulch with 100% and non-mulched with 60% ETc respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–1003 · show in text ↑
e1

“The capsicum (Capsicum annuum L.) variety California Wonder was planted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–302 · show in text ↑
t0

“capsicum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total dry matter was highest at 120.4 g under silver mulch with 100% ETc.

Taxon
capsicumCapsicumt0
Treatment
silver mulch with 100%e0
Outcome
total dry mattere0
Direction
higheste0
Value
120.4 ge0
Qualifier
57 ge0
Comparator
non-mulched with 60% ETce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest and lowest plant height (149.9 cm and 56.5 cm), leaf area (1.98 m2/m2 and 1.09 m2/m2) and total dry matter (120.4 g and 57 g) were observed under silver mulch with 100% and non-mulched with 60% ETc respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–1003 · show in text ↑
e1

“The capsicum (Capsicum annuum L.) variety California Wonder was planted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–302 · show in text ↑
t0

“capsicum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest growth parameters under silver mulch with 100% ETc were at par with silver mulch at 80% ETc.

Taxon
capsicumCapsicumt0
Treatment
silver mulch with 80% ETce0
Outcome
growth parameterse0
Direction
at pare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest growth parameters were at par with silver mulch with 80% ETc treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1125 · show in text ↑
e1

“The capsicum (Capsicum annuum L.) variety California Wonder was planted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–302 · show in text ↑
t0

“capsicum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silver mulch with 80% ETc had significantly higher crop water productivity of 43.30-36.53 kg/m3 than other treatments.

Taxon
capsicumCapsicumt0
Treatment
silver mulch with 80 % ETce0
Outcome
crop water productivitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
43.30-36.53 kg/m3e0
Comparator
other combination of treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher crop water productivity (43.30-36.53 kg/m3) in silver mulch with 80 % ETc treatment was observed compared to other combination of treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1288 · show in text ↑
e1

“The capsicum (Capsicum annuum L.) variety California Wonder was planted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–302 · show in text ↑
t0

“capsicum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silver mulch at 80% ETc saved irrigation water.

Taxon
capsicumCapsicume0
Treatment
silver coloured plastic mulche0
Outcome
irrigation watere0
Direction
savede0
Qualifier
80% ETce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“capsicum cultivation under silver coloured plastic mulch in the naturally ventilated greenhouse not only saved irrigation water but also enhanced yield, crop growth and crop water productivity at reduced level of irrigation (80% ETc).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1550 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Silver mulch was recommended for greenhouse capsicum cultivation.

Taxon
capsicumCapsicume0
Outcome
Silver colour plastic mulche0
Setting
naturally ventilated greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Silver colour plastic mulch was found to be best suitable for growing capsicum crop inside the naturally ventilated greenhouse.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1551–1678 · show in text ↑

silver atom · physiology: water · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

silver atom · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

silver atom · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

mulching · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results differ

41 papers: 39 positive, 2 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

mulching · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

mulching · physiology: water · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.