Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Silver mulch at 100% ETc produced significantly higher capsicum yield of 63-71.6 t/ha.

A claim from Effects of mulching and irrigation levels on greenhouse capsicum (Capsicum annuum) · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silver mulch at 100% ETc produced significantly higher capsicum yield of 63-71.6 t/ha.

Taxon
capsicumCapsicume0
Material
California Wondere1
Treatment
silver mulche0
Outcome
yield of capsicume0
Direction
highere0
Value
63-71.6 t/hae0
Qualifier
100% ETce0
Comparator
yellow mulche0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield of capsicum was observed significantly higher under silver mulch (63-71.6 t/ha) followed by yellow mulch (60.04-67.04 t/ha) at 100% ETc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–619
e1

“The capsicum (Capsicum annuum L.) variety California Wonder was planted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–302

Title

Effects of mulching and irrigation levels on greenhouse capsicum (Capsicum annuum)

LAULINA KUMARI; MURTAZA HASAN; R D RANDHE; et al. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2021. doi:10.56093/ijas.v91i6.114249

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-60197967fec014ebe1c881659dfd3c2739dc5ee7ba24673a56826df81762accd · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

silver atom · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

mulching · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results differ

41 papers: 39 positive, 2 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.