Paper · 1972

Irrigation and fertiliser responses of wheat, maize, jowar and bajra in I.A.D.P. districts

K.S. Krishman; P. Soni; V. S. Rustogi

10
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Data on irrigation responses and interaction of irrigation and fertilizer effects from 9,872 crop-cutting experiments on wheat, maize, jowar and gram conducted from 1963-64 to 1960-70 in IADP districts were collated to estimate yardsticks of additional yield due to fertilizer application under rainfed and irrigated conditions. Wide fluctuations were found in additional yield due to irrigation from crop to crop, district to district for the same crop and from year to year for a crop in the same district. The additional yield due to irrigation of wheat varied from 0.8 to 4.3 quintals per hectare. The main yardstick in terms of kg. of additional grain per kg. of plant nutrients N + P2O5 + K2O for wheat were 11.6 and 9.8 under irrigated and rainfed conditions respectively. For maize, jowar and gram, these values were 10.5, 5.5, 7.4 respectively under irrigated conditions and 11.7, 6.3 and 6.5 under rainfed conditions respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Additional irrigation yield fluctuated across crops, districts and years.

Taxon
crope0
Outcome
additional yield due to irrigatione0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Wide fluctuations were found in additional yield due to irrigation from crop to crop, district to district for the same crop and from year to year for a crop in the same district.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation added 0.8 to 4.3 quintals per hectare of wheat yield.

Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
additional yielde0
Direction
additionale0
Value
0.8 to 4.3 quintals per hectaree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The additional yield due to irrigation of wheat varied from 0.8 to 4.3 quintals per hectare.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–601 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under irrigation, wheat produced 11.6 kg additional grain per kg plant nutrients.

Treatment
plant nutrients N + P2O5 + K2Oe0
Outcome
kg. of additional grain per kg. of plant nutrientse0
Direction
additionale0
Value
11.6e0
Setting
irrigatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The main yardstick in terms of kg. of additional grain per kg. of plant nutrients N + P2O5 + K2O for wheat were 11.6 and 9.8 under irrigated and rainfed conditions respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–779 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under rainfed conditions, wheat produced 9.8 kg additional grain per kg plant nutrients.

Treatment
plant nutrients N + P2O5 + K2Oe0
Outcome
kg. of additional grain per kg. of plant nutrientse0
Direction
additionale0
Value
9.8e0
Setting
rainfede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The main yardstick in terms of kg. of additional grain per kg. of plant nutrients N + P2O5 + K2O for wheat were 11.6 and 9.8 under irrigated and rainfed conditions respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–779 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The additional-grain yardstick for maize was 10.5 under irrigation.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
these valuese0
Value
10.5e0
Setting
irrigated conditionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For maize, jowar and gram, these values were 10.5, 5.5, 7.4 respectively under irrigated conditions and 11.7, 6.3 and 6.5 under rainfed conditions respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–940 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The additional-grain yardstick for jowar was 5.5 under irrigation.

Taxon
joware0
Outcome
these valuese0
Value
5.5e0
Setting
irrigated conditionse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“For maize, jowar and gram, these values were 10.5, 5.5, 7.4 respectively under irrigated conditions and 11.7, 6.3 and 6.5 under rainfed conditions respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–940 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The additional-grain yardstick for gram was 7.4 under irrigation.

Taxon
grame0
Outcome
these valuese0
Value
7.4e0
Setting
irrigated conditionse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“For maize, jowar and gram, these values were 10.5, 5.5, 7.4 respectively under irrigated conditions and 11.7, 6.3 and 6.5 under rainfed conditions respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–940 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The additional-grain yardstick for maize was 11.7 under rainfed conditions.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
these valuese0
Value
11.7e0
Setting
rainfed conditionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For maize, jowar and gram, these values were 10.5, 5.5, 7.4 respectively under irrigated conditions and 11.7, 6.3 and 6.5 under rainfed conditions respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–940 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The additional-grain yardstick for jowar was 6.3 under rainfed conditions.

Taxon
joware0
Outcome
these valuese0
Value
6.3e0
Setting
rainfed conditionse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“For maize, jowar and gram, these values were 10.5, 5.5, 7.4 respectively under irrigated conditions and 11.7, 6.3 and 6.5 under rainfed conditions respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–940 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The additional-grain yardstick for gram was 6.5 under rainfed conditions.

Taxon
grame0
Outcome
these valuese0
Value
6.5e0
Setting
rainfed conditionse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“For maize, jowar and gram, these values were 10.5, 5.5, 7.4 respectively under irrigated conditions and 11.7, 6.3 and 6.5 under rainfed conditions respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–940 · show in text ↑

potassium · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

82 papers: 71 positive, 11 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

226 papers: 198 positive, 28 negative or no effect

197 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

222 papers more in this group

See all 226 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.