Paper · 1995 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

Sucrose Release into the Endosperm Cavity of Wheat Grains Apparently Occurs by Facilitated Diffusion across the Nucellar Cell Membranes

N. Wang; D. B. Fisher

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
38
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Nutrients required for the growth of the embryo and endosperm of developing wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grains are released into the endosperm cavity from the maternal tissues across the nucellar cell plasma membranes. We followed the uptake and efflux of sugars into and out of the nucellus by slicing grains longitudinally through the endosperm cavity to expose the nucellar surface to experimental solutions. Sucrose uptake and efflux are passive processes. Neither was sensitive to metabolic inhibitors, pH, or potassium concentration. p-Chloromercuribenzene sulfonate, however, strongly inhibited both uptake and efflux, although not equally. Except for p-chloromercuribenzene sensitivity, these characteristics of efflux and the insensitivity of Suc movement to turgor pressure are similar to those of sucrose release from maize pedicels, but they contrast with legume seed coats. Although the evidence is incomplete, movement appears to be carrier mediated rather than channel mediated. In vitro rates of sucrose efflux were similar to or somewhat less than in vivo rates, suggesting that transport across the nucellar cell membranes could be a factor in the control of assimilate import into the grain.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose uptake and efflux across wheat nucellar membranes are passive.

Outcome
Sucrose uptake and effluxe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sucrose uptake and efflux are passive processes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–461 · show in text ↑
e1

“developing wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose uptake and efflux were insensitive to metabolic inhibitors, pH, and potassium concentration.

Treatment
metabolic inhibitors, pH, or potassium concentratione0
Outcome
Sucrose uptake and effluxe2
Direction
Neither was sensitivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither was sensitive to metabolic inhibitors, pH, or potassium concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–540 · show in text ↑
e1

“developing wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–111 · show in text ↑
e2

“Sucrose uptake and efflux are passive processes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–461 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

p-Chloromercuribenzene sulfonate strongly inhibited sucrose uptake and efflux, unequally.

Treatment
p-Chloromercuribenzene sulfonatee0
Outcome
uptake and effluxe0
Direction
strongly inhibitede0
Qualifier
although not equallye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“p-Chloromercuribenzene sulfonate, however, strongly inhibited both uptake and efflux, although not equally.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–648 · show in text ↑
e1

“developing wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose movement was insensitive to turgor pressure.

Treatment
turgor pressuree0
Outcome
Suc movemente0
Direction
insensitivitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the insensitivity of Suc movement to turgor pressure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–784 · show in text ↑
e1

“developing wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–111 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose movement appears carrier mediated rather than channel mediated, with incomplete evidence.

Outcome
Sucrose uptake and effluxe2
Qualifier
carrier mediated rather than channel mediatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although the evidence is incomplete, movement appears to be carrier mediated rather than channel mediated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–994 · show in text ↑
e1

“developing wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–111 · show in text ↑
e2

“Sucrose uptake and efflux are passive processes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–461 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In vitro sucrose efflux rates were similar to or somewhat less than in vivo rates.

Outcome
rates of sucrose effluxe0
Direction
similar to or somewhat less thane0
Comparator
in vivo ratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In vitro rates of sucrose efflux were similar to or somewhat less than in vivo rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1079 · show in text ↑
e1

“developing wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–111 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transport across nucellar membranes could control assimilate import into wheat grains.

Outcome
assimilate import into the graine0
Qualifier
transport across the nucellar cell membranese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“transport across the nucellar cell membranes could be a factor in the control of assimilate import into the grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1210 · show in text ↑
e1

“developing wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–111 · show in text ↑

p-chloromercuribenzenesulfonate · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

ph · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 11 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

potassium · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

82 papers: 71 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 71 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.