Paper · 2013 · Plant Disease Research

Effect of planting techniques, irrigation and weed management on major diseases and yield of field pea

Snehlata Kumari; Santosh Kumar; H.S. Tripathi; et al.

10
claims
28
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Studies were conducted consecutively during two Rabi seasons of 2008–09 and 2009–10 to ascertain the effects of planting techniques, irrigation and weed management on disease severity of wilt (F. oxysporum f.sp. pisi), rust (Uromyces fabae), powdery mildew (Erysiphe pisi) and grain yield of field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Wilt and powdery mildew were higher in raised bed planting and also in plots without irrigation while rust (28.3%) was more severe in flat bed planting. Yield was found higher in raised bed planting and irrigation at critical stages of the field pea crop. In all the three diseases, higher severity was found in weedy plots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wilt severity was higher with raised bed planting.

Taxon
field peat0
Treatment
raised bed plantinge0
Interactor
F. oxysporum f.sp. pisie1pathogen
Outcome
Wilte0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Wilt and powdery mildew were higher in raised bed planting and also in plots without irrigation while rust (28.3%) was more severe in flat bed planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–473 · show in text ↑
e1

“wilt (F. oxysporum f.sp. pisi), rust (Uromyces fabae), powdery mildew (Erysiphe pisi)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

powdery mildew severity was higher with raised bed planting.

Taxon
field peat0
Treatment
raised bed plantinge0
Interactor
Erysiphe pisiErysiphe pisie1pathogen
Outcome
powdery mildewe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Erysiphe pisi
Erysiphe pisi · InteractorJerzy Opioła · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Wilt and powdery mildew were higher in raised bed planting and also in plots without irrigation while rust (28.3%) was more severe in flat bed planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–473 · show in text ↑
e1

“wilt (F. oxysporum f.sp. pisi), rust (Uromyces fabae), powdery mildew (Erysiphe pisi)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wilt severity was higher with plots without irrigation.

Taxon
field peat0
Treatment
plots without irrigatione0
Interactor
F. oxysporum f.sp. pisie1pathogen
Outcome
Wilte0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Wilt and powdery mildew were higher in raised bed planting and also in plots without irrigation while rust (28.3%) was more severe in flat bed planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–473 · show in text ↑
e1

“wilt (F. oxysporum f.sp. pisi), rust (Uromyces fabae), powdery mildew (Erysiphe pisi)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

powdery mildew severity was higher with plots without irrigation.

Taxon
field peat0
Treatment
plots without irrigatione0
Interactor
Erysiphe pisiErysiphe pisie1pathogen
Outcome
powdery mildewe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Erysiphe pisi
Erysiphe pisi · InteractorJerzy Opioła · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Wilt and powdery mildew were higher in raised bed planting and also in plots without irrigation while rust (28.3%) was more severe in flat bed planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–473 · show in text ↑
e1

“wilt (F. oxysporum f.sp. pisi), rust (Uromyces fabae), powdery mildew (Erysiphe pisi)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rust was more severe in flat beds, at 28.3%.

Taxon
field peat0
Treatment
flat bed plantinge0
Interactor
Uromyces fabaeUromyces viciae-fabaee1pathogen
Outcome
ruste0
Direction
more severee0
Value
28.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Uromyces viciae-fabae
Uromyces viciae-fabae · InteractorCwmhiraeth · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“rust (28.3%) was more severe in flat bed planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–473 · show in text ↑
e1

“rust (Uromyces fabae)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field pea yield was higher with raised bed planting.

Taxon
field peat0
Treatment
raised bed plantinge0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Yield was found higher in raised bed planting and irrigation at critical stages of the field pea crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–576 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field pea yield was higher with irrigation at critical stages.

Taxon
field peat0
Treatment
irrigation at critical stagese0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Yield was found higher in raised bed planting and irrigation at critical stages of the field pea crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–576 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

wilt severity was higher in weedy plots.

Taxon
field peat0
Interactor
F. oxysporum f.sp. pisie1pathogen
Outcome
severitye0
Direction
highere0
Setting
weedy plotse0

Verbatim

t0

“field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“In all the three diseases, higher severity was found in weedy plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–645 · show in text ↑
e1

“wilt (F. oxysporum f.sp. pisi), rust (Uromyces fabae), powdery mildew (Erysiphe pisi)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–272 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

rust severity was higher in weedy plots.

Taxon
field peat0
Interactor
Uromyces fabaeUromyces viciae-fabaee1pathogen
Outcome
severitye0
Direction
highere0
Setting
weedy plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Uromyces viciae-fabae
Uromyces viciae-fabae · InteractorCwmhiraeth · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“In all the three diseases, higher severity was found in weedy plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–645 · show in text ↑
e1

“wilt (F. oxysporum f.sp. pisi), rust (Uromyces fabae), powdery mildew (Erysiphe pisi)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–272 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

powdery mildew severity was higher in weedy plots.

Taxon
field peat0
Interactor
Erysiphe pisiErysiphe pisie1pathogen
Outcome
severitye0
Direction
highere0
Setting
weedy plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Erysiphe pisi
Erysiphe pisi · InteractorJerzy Opioła · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“In all the three diseases, higher severity was found in weedy plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–645 · show in text ↑
e1

“wilt (F. oxysporum f.sp. pisi), rust (Uromyces fabae), powdery mildew (Erysiphe pisi)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–272 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

52 papers: 46 positive, 6 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

tillage · disease · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

tillage · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 53 positive, 16 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

irrigation · disease · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.