Paper · 2022 · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems

Increased Resilience of Peas Toward Root Rot Pathogens Can Be Predicted by the Nematode Metabolic Footprint

Jan H. Schmidt; Leonard V. Theisgen; Maria R. Finckh; et al.

15
claims
21
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Legumes are important drivers of soil fertility, however, their frequent use in rotations fosters long-lived soil-borne pathogens that can seriously compromise legume root health and nitrogen fixation. To overcome this, the current study aims at improving the general soil suppressiveness toward pests and diseases by agroecosystem management that can be predicted by nematode-based bioindicators. Two long-term organically managed agroecosystems comparing plow and shallow non-inversion tillage were analyzed for free-living nematode communities. Soils out of these agroecosystems were evaluated further in a greenhouse assay for their ability to suppress pea root rot caused by Didymella pinodella, Fusarium avenaceum , and F. redolens . There was a general trend for higher levels of pea root rot disease severity following inoculations with single pathogens, however, this effect was heterogeneous among experiments and tillage systems. This was mainly due to an already very high resident population of D. pinodella in soil and the presence of seed-borne F. oxysporum determined by their high incidence in pea roots irrespective of the soil and inoculated pathogens. Additional inoculation with D. pinodella , for example, resulted in only 8.5% biomass reduction compared to the non-inoculated control, in both tillage systems. Similar biomass losses were recorded in non-inversion tilled soils inoculated with F. redolens . When analyzed across inoculation treatments, the pea root rot disease severity was only slightly reduced in non-inversion tilled soils when compared to the plough systems (11% in Exp 1 and, 9% in Exp 2), however in both experiments non-inversion tillage resulted in greater pea biomass (33 and 19% in Exp1 and 2, respectively). Furthermore, the metabolic, enrichment, and bacterivore carbon footprints of nematodes were 88, 81, and 97% higher, respectively, in the non-inversion tilled soils compared to the plough. The metabolic carbon footprint of nematodes correlated negatively with pea root rot disease severity (rho = −0.71, p = 0.047). Hence, non-inversion tillage was effective in controlling pea root rot. The use of nematode metabolic footprints for predicting soil health should be extended for various agroecosystems aiming for its general use in evaluating effects of agroecosystem management through researchers and potentially farm management advisors.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single-pathogen inoculations tended to increase pea root rot severity, with variable effects.

Treatment
inoculations with single pathogense0
Outcome
pea root rot disease severitye0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
heterogeneous among experiments and tillage systemse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a general trend for higher levels of pea root rot disease severity following inoculations with single pathogens, however, this effect was heterogeneous among experiments and tillage systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–940 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

D. pinodella had high incidence in pea roots regardless of treatment.

Interactor
D. pinodellaDidymella pinodellae0pathogen
Outcome
incidence in pea rootse0
Direction
highe0
Qualifier
irrespective of the soil and inoculated pathogense0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This was mainly due to an already very high resident population of D. pinodella in soil and the presence of seed-borne F. oxysporum determined by their high incidence in pea roots irrespective of the soil and inoculated pathogens.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1171 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F. oxysporum had high incidence in pea roots regardless of treatment.

Interactor
F. oxysporumFusarium oxysporume0pathogen
Outcome
incidence in pea rootse0
Direction
highe0
Qualifier
irrespective of the soil and inoculated pathogense0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the presence of seed-borne F. oxysporum determined by their high incidence in pea roots irrespective of the soil and inoculated pathogens.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1171 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

D. pinodella inoculation reduced pea biomass by 8.5% in both tillage systems.

Treatment
inoculation with D. pinodellae0
Interactor
D. pinodellaDidymella pinodellae0pathogen
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
8.5%e0
Qualifier
both tillage systemse0
Comparator
non-inoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additional inoculation with D. pinodella , for example, resulted in only 8.5% biomass reduction compared to the non-inoculated control, in both tillage systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1332 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F. redolens inoculation caused similar pea biomass losses in non-inversion tilled soil.

Treatment
inoculated with F. redolense0
Interactor
F. redolensFusarium redolense0pathogen
Outcome
biomass lossese0
Direction
lossese0
Qualifier
non-inversion tilled soilse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar biomass losses were recorded in non-inversion tilled soils inoculated with F. redolens .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1429 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-inversion tillage reduced pea root rot severity by 11% in experiment 1.

Treatment
non-inversion tilled soilse0
Outcome
pea root rot disease severitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
11%e0
Qualifier
Exp 1e0
Comparator
plough systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the pea root rot disease severity was only slightly reduced in non-inversion tilled soils when compared to the plough systems (11% in Exp 1 and, 9% in Exp 2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1475–1632 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-inversion tillage reduced pea root rot severity by 9% in experiment 2.

Treatment
non-inversion tilled soilse0
Outcome
pea root rot disease severitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
9%e0
Qualifier
Exp 2e0
Comparator
plough systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the pea root rot disease severity was only slightly reduced in non-inversion tilled soils when compared to the plough systems (11% in Exp 1 and, 9% in Exp 2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1475–1632 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-inversion tillage raised pea biomass by 33% in experiment 1.

Treatment
non-inversion tillagee0
Outcome
pea biomasse0
Direction
greatere0
Value
33e0
Qualifier
Exp1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in both experiments non-inversion tillage resulted in greater pea biomass (33 and 19% in Exp1 and 2, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1642–1756 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-inversion tillage raised pea biomass by 19% in experiment 2.

Treatment
non-inversion tillagee0
Outcome
pea biomasse0
Direction
greatere0
Value
19%e0
Qualifier
2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in both experiments non-inversion tillage resulted in greater pea biomass (33 and 19% in Exp1 and 2, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1642–1756 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-inversion tillage increased nematode metabolic relative to plough.

Treatment
non-inversion tilled soilse0
Interactor
nematodesNematodae0other
Outcome
carbon footprints of nematodese0
Direction
highere0
Value
88e0
Qualifier
metabolice0
Comparator
the ploughe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the metabolic, enrichment, and bacterivore carbon footprints of nematodes were 88, 81, and 97% higher, respectively, in the non-inversion tilled soils compared to the plough.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1771–1945 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-inversion tillage increased nematode enrichment relative to plough.

Treatment
non-inversion tilled soilse0
Interactor
nematodesNematodae0other
Outcome
carbon footprints of nematodese0
Direction
highere0
Value
81e0
Qualifier
enrichmente0
Comparator
the ploughe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the metabolic, enrichment, and bacterivore carbon footprints of nematodes were 88, 81, and 97% higher, respectively, in the non-inversion tilled soils compared to the plough.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1771–1945 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–28 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-inversion tillage increased nematode bacterivore relative to plough.

Treatment
non-inversion tilled soilse0
Interactor
nematodesNematodae0other
Outcome
bacterivore carbon footprints of nematodese0
Direction
highere0
Value
97%e0
Qualifier
bacterivoree0
Comparator
the ploughe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the metabolic, enrichment, and bacterivore carbon footprints of nematodes were 88, 81, and 97% higher, respectively, in the non-inversion tilled soils compared to the plough.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1771–1945 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–28 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode metabolic carbon footprint was negatively correlated with pea root rot severity.

Interactor
nematodesNematodae0other
Outcome
pea root rot disease severitye0
Direction
negativelye0
Value
rho = −0.71e0
Qualifier
p = 0.047e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The metabolic carbon footprint of nematodes correlated negatively with pea root rot disease severity (rho = −0.71, p = 0.047).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1946–2072 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors judged non-inversion tillage effective for controlling pea root rot.

Treatment
non-inversion tillagee0
Outcome
controlling pea root rote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“non-inversion tillage was effective in controlling pea root rot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2080–2144 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended broader evaluation of nematode metabolic footprints for soil-health prediction.

Interactor
nematodeNematodae0other
Outcome
The use of nematode metabolic footprints for predicting soil health should be extendede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of nematode metabolic footprints for predicting soil health should be extended for various agroecosystems aiming for its general use in evaluating effects of agroecosystem management through researchers and potentially farm management advisors.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2145–2397 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–28 · show in text ↑

tillage · disease · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

tillage · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 12 positive, 5 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

inoculation · disease · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 18 positive, 24 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

inoculation · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

89 papers: 72 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 72 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.