Paper · 2016 · Plant Species Biology

Local adaptation to different phytogeographic regions: habitat‐related variations in seed germination in response to temperature and salinity for two medicinal S alvia species from J ordan

Mohammad M. Al‐Gharaibeh; Hassan R. Hamasha; Susanne Lachmuth; et al.

10
claims
17
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract S alvia spinosa L . and S alvia syriaca L . are perennial medicinal herbs that occur in the M editerranean, I rano‐ T uranian and S aharo‐ A rabian phytogeographic regions of J ordan. With respect to the seed germination requirements, prevailing environmental conditions in each phytogeographic region may promote local adaptation and consequently affect the distribution range of the species. Using seeds of both species collected from populations across the three regions, we tested responses to variations in temperature and salinity under laboratory conditions. Both species showed significant differences in cumulative germination percentages and germination rates (modified T imson Index) with temperature, while origin only significantly affected S . spinosa seeds. Both species germinated best under the highest temperature regime (32/20° C ). The low temperature regime (8/4° C ) completely inhibited germination in S . syriaca , wheras it led to 80% to 95% germination in S . spinosa , with significant variation being recorded between the phytogeographic regions. For both species, salt solutions of 0, 25 and 50 mM NaC l yielded the highest germination percentages and rates, which sharply and significantly declined at higher concentrations (100 and 200 mM NaC l). Our results provide evidence of local adaptation of the study species to salinity and temperature in the respective maternal environments, particularly in the I rano‐ T uranian and S aharo‐ A rabian regions. Such differentiation should be accounted for in future conservation planning.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both species differed significantly in cumulative germination with temperature.

Taxon
S alvia spinosa L . and S alvia syriaca L .e0
Treatment
temperaturee1
Outcome
cumulative germination percentagese1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“S alvia spinosa L . and S alvia syriaca L .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–52 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both species showed significant differences in cumulative germination percentages and germination rates (modified T imson Index) with temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–720 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both species differed significantly in germination rate with temperature.

Taxon
S alvia spinosa L . and S alvia syriaca L .e0
Treatment
temperaturee1
Outcome
germination ratese1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“S alvia spinosa L . and S alvia syriaca L .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–52 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both species showed significant differences in cumulative germination percentages and germination rates (modified T imson Index) with temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–720 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Origin significantly affected spinosa seed germination.

Taxon
S . spinosae0
Outcome
S . spinosa seedse0
Setting
origine0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“origin only significantly affected S . spinosa seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–780 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both species germinated best at 32/20° C.

Taxon
S alvia spinosa L . and S alvia syriaca L .e1
Treatment
highest temperature regime (32/20° C )e0
Outcome
germinatede0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Both species germinated best under the highest temperature regime (32/20° C )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–859 · show in text ↑
e1

“S alvia spinosa L . and S alvia syriaca L .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 8/4° C, syriaca germination was fully inhibited.

Taxon
S . syriacae0
Treatment
low temperature regime (8/4° C )e0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
completely inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The low temperature regime (8/4° C ) completely inhibited germination in S . syriaca”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–945 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 8/4° C, spinosa germination was 80% to 95% with regional variation.

Taxon
S . spinosae0
Treatment
low temperature regime (8/4° C )e0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
led toe0
Value
80% to 95%e0
Setting
phytogeographic regionse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The low temperature regime (8/4° C ) completely inhibited germination in S . syriaca , wheras it led to 80% to 95% germination in S . spinosa , with significant variation being recorded between the phytogeographic regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–1082 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both species had their highest germination percentages at 0, 25 and 50 mM NaCl.

Taxon
S alvia spinosa L . and S alvia syriaca L .e1
Treatment
salt solutions of 0, 25 and 50 mM NaC le0
Outcome
germination percentages and ratese0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“For both species, salt solutions of 0, 25 and 50 mM NaC l yielded the highest germination percentages and rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1195 · show in text ↑
e1

“S alvia spinosa L . and S alvia syriaca L .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination percentages and rates fell significantly at 100 and 200 mM NaCl.

Taxon
S alvia spinosa L . and S alvia syriaca L .e1
Treatment
higher concentrations (100 and 200 mM NaC l)e0
Outcome
germination percentages and ratese0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“germination percentages and rates, which sharply and significantly declined at higher concentrations (100 and 200 mM NaC l)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1285 · show in text ↑
e1

“S alvia spinosa L . and S alvia syriaca L .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–52 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors interpret the responses as local adaptation to temperature and salinity.

Taxon
S alvia spinosa L . and S alvia syriaca L .e1
Outcome
local adaptatione0
Setting
I rano‐ T uranian and S aharo‐ A rabian regionse0

Verbatim

e0

“Our results provide evidence of local adaptation of the study species to salinity and temperature in the respective maternal environments, particularly in the I rano‐ T uranian and S aharo‐ A rabian regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1493 · show in text ↑
e1

“S alvia spinosa L . and S alvia syriaca L .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–52 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend considering differentiation in conservation planning.

Taxon
S alvia spinosa L . and S alvia syriaca L .e1
Outcome
future conservation planninge0

Verbatim

e0

“Such differentiation should be accounted for in future conservation planning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1495–1571 · show in text ↑
e1

“S alvia spinosa L . and S alvia syriaca L .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–52 · show in text ↑