Paper · 2014 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

Are early foliar fungicide applications on durum wheat grown in southeast Saskatchewan beneficial in increasing grain productivity?

M. R. Fernandez; W. E. May; S. Chalmers; et al.

13
claims
25
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Fernandez, M. R., May, W. E., Chalmers, S., Savard, M. E. and Singh, A. K. 2014. Are early foliar fungicide applications on durum wheat grown in southeast Saskatchewan beneficial in increasing grain productivity? Can. J. Plant. Sci. 94: 891–903. Producers have expressed interest in applying fungicides early in the development of durum wheat to reduce disease severity and increase grain yield. To address this issue, a field trial was conducted in southeast Saskatchewan (2004–2006) to determine the impacts of single and double foliar fungicide (tebuconazole) applications at various growth stages on leaf spotting, Fusarium head blight/Fusarium-damaged kernels, deoxynivalenol concentration, dark kernel discolouration, and grain traits of durum wheat. In most cases, application at stem elongation was not effective in reducing Fusarium diseases, or improving yield and grain characteristics. Application at flag leaf emergence was more effective, but for the most part, application at anthesis resulted in the most consistent reduction in disease levels, and improvement in test weight. Double fungicide applications (stem elongation or flag leaf emergence, and anthesis) were not more effective in disease control than a single application at anthesis. Grain yield did not differ significantly among any of the treatments. In contrast to Fusarium diseases and leaf spotting, fungicide applications at stem elongation and/or flag leaf emergence resulted in increased kernel weight and percentage dark kernel discolouration, which was significant in 2005 (10.53–10.60% total kernel discolouration in the stem and flag leaf treatments vs. 6.13% for the untreated control). In one or more years, kernel weight was negatively associated with Fusarium disease variables and leaf spotting, but positively associated with kernel discolouration. We conclude that under variable environmental conditions in Saskatchewan, early preventative fungicide use on durum wheat should not be recommended as a strategy to improve productivity, and might even result in increases in dark kernel discolouration and grain downgrading.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem elongation tebuconazole generally did not reduce Fusarium diseases.

Treatment
application at stem elongatione0
Interactor
FusariumFusariume0pathogen
Outcome
Fusarium diseasese0
Direction
not effective in reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In most cases, application at stem elongation was not effective in reducing Fusarium diseases, or improving yield and grain characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–896 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem elongation application generally did not improve yield and grain characteristics.

Treatment
application at stem elongatione0
Outcome
yield and grain characteristicse0
Direction
not effective in reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In most cases, application at stem elongation was not effective in reducing Fusarium diseases, or improving yield and grain characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–896 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flag leaf application was more effective than stem elongation application.

Treatment
Application at flag leaf emergencee0
Outcome
more effectivee0
Direction
more effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application at flag leaf emergence was more effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Anthesis application most consistently reduced disease levels.

Treatment
application at anthesise0
Outcome
disease levelse0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application at anthesis resulted in the most consistent reduction in disease levels, and improvement in test weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1091 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Anthesis application improved test weight.

Treatment
application at anthesise0
Outcome
test weighte0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application at anthesis resulted in the most consistent reduction in disease levels, and improvement in test weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1091 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double applications were no more effective in disease control than anthesis alone.

Treatment
Double fungicide applicationse0
Outcome
disease controle0
Direction
not more effectivee0
Comparator
single application at anthesise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Double fungicide applications (stem elongation or flag leaf emergence, and anthesis) were not more effective in disease control than a single application at anthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1258 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield did not differ significantly among treatments.

Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
did not differe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield did not differ significantly among any of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1328 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early applications increased kernel weight.

Treatment
fungicide applications at stem elongation and/or flag leaf emergencee0
Outcome
kernel weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fungicide applications at stem elongation and/or flag leaf emergence resulted in increased kernel weight and percentage dark kernel discolouration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1528 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early applications increased dark kernel discolouration, significantly in 2005.

Treatment
fungicide applications at stem elongation and/or flag leaf emergencee0
Outcome
percentage dark kernel discolouratione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10.53–10.60%e0
Qualifier
6.13%e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fungicide applications at stem elongation and/or flag leaf emergence resulted in increased kernel weight and percentage dark kernel discolouration, which was significant in 2005 (10.53–10.60% total kernel discolouration in the stem and flag leaf treatments vs. 6.13% for the untreated control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1675 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–54 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kernel weight was negatively associated with Fusarium disease variables.

Interactor
FusariumFusariume0pathogen
Outcome
kernel weighte0
Direction
negativelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“kernel weight was negatively associated with Fusarium disease variables and leaf spotting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1699–1788 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–54 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kernel weight was negatively associated with leaf spotting.

Outcome
kernel weighte0
Direction
negativelye0
Comparator
leaf spottinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“kernel weight was negatively associated with Fusarium disease variables and leaf spotting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1699–1788 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–54 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kernel weight was positively associated with kernel discolouration.

Outcome
kernel weighte0
Direction
positivelye0
Comparator
kernel discolouratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“kernel weight was negatively associated with Fusarium disease variables and leaf spotting, but positively associated with kernel discolouration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1699–1842 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–54 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors advised against early preventive fungicide use for productivity.

Outcome
early preventative fungicide use on durum wheat should not be recommendede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“early preventative fungicide use on durum wheat should not be recommended as a strategy to improve productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1918–2029 · show in text ↑

fungicide · yield · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.