Paper · 2020 · The Agrarian Scientific Journal

Improving the technology of spring wheat cultivation in the Volga region

Oleg Ivanovich Goryanin; Elena Vladimirovna Shcherbinina

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The results of research on the study of two traditional and six technologies (options) with direct seeding of spring durum wheat bezenchukskaya Zolotistaya (soy precursor), on ordinary chernozem in 2017-2019 are presented. In the six-field crop rotation, it was found that when growing new varieties resistant to the main pathogens, against the background of direct seeding and improving the nitrogen supply of plants, the use of modern fungicides is justified only in years favorable for moisture, when the yield increase reaches 0.19 t/ha (5.9 %). On a natural background of fertility, additional costs for processing crops with fungicides are not recouped by increasing the yield. With traditional technology, treatment of crops with Soligor fungicide provides an average of three years increase in grain yield by 0.15 t / ha (7.9 %), net income of 308.1 rubles/ha (4.6%). The highest net income and profitability were revealed against the background of direct seeding and the use of ammonium nitrate – 8327.8-8532.0 rubles / ha and 70.7-80.7 %. Based on the research, when cultivating new varieties of spring durum wheat, it is recommended to introduce ammonium nitrate (N30) during the sowing period. When protecting plants-seed treatment, treatment of crops with herbicides and insecticides. The use of fungicides is rational to carry out in years favorable for moisture. Against the background of the use of biofungicide Phytosporin, the use of fungicides is not advisable.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide use in years favorable for moisture raised yield by 0.19 t/ha (5.9 %) with new resistant varieties under direct seeding.

Taxon
spring durum wheatTriticum turgidum subsp. durume0
Material
bezenchukskaya Zolotistayae0
Treatment
modern fungicidese1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Value
0.19 t/ha (5.9 %)e1
Qualifier
only in years favorable for moisturee1
Setting
ordinary chernozeme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“direct seeding of spring durum wheat bezenchukskaya Zolotistaya (soy precursor), on ordinary chernozem in 2017-2019”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–207 · show in text ↑
e1

“the use of modern fungicides is justified only in years favorable for moisture, when the yield increase reaches 0.19 t/ha (5.9 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–548 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On natural fertility, fungicide processing costs were not recouped by the yield increase.

Taxon
spring durum wheatTriticum turgidum subsp. durume0
Treatment
processing crops with fungicidese2
Outcome
additional costse2
Direction
not recoupede2
Qualifier
On a natural background of fertilitye2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“direct seeding of spring durum wheat bezenchukskaya Zolotistaya (soy precursor), on ordinary chernozem in 2017-2019”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–207 · show in text ↑
e2

“On a natural background of fertility, additional costs for processing crops with fungicides are not recouped by increasing the yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–682 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soligor fungicide with traditional technology raised average grain yield over three years by 0.15 t/ha (7.9 %).

Taxon
spring durum wheatTriticum turgidum subsp. durume0
Treatment
Soligor fungicidee3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
increasee3
Value
0.15 t / ha (7.9 %)e3
Qualifier
average of three yearse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“direct seeding of spring durum wheat bezenchukskaya Zolotistaya (soy precursor), on ordinary chernozem in 2017-2019”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–207 · show in text ↑
e3

“With traditional technology, treatment of crops with Soligor fungicide provides an average of three years increase in grain yield by 0.15 t / ha (7.9 %), net income of 308.1 rubles/ha (4.6%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–874 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soligor fungicide with traditional technology gave a net income of 308.1 rubles/ha (4.6%).

Taxon
spring durum wheatTriticum turgidum subsp. durume0
Treatment
Soligor fungicidee3
Outcome
net incomee3
Direction
increaseinferrede3
Value
308.1 rubles/ha (4.6%)e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“direct seeding of spring durum wheat bezenchukskaya Zolotistaya (soy precursor), on ordinary chernozem in 2017-2019”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–207 · show in text ↑
e3

“With traditional technology, treatment of crops with Soligor fungicide provides an average of three years increase in grain yield by 0.15 t / ha (7.9 %), net income of 308.1 rubles/ha (4.6%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–874 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct seeding with ammonium nitrate gave the highest net income, 8327.8-8532.0 rubles/ha.

Taxon
spring durum wheatTriticum turgidum subsp. durume0
Treatment
ammonium nitratee4
Outcome
net incomee4
Direction
higheste4
Value
8327.8-8532.0 rubles / hae4
Qualifier
against the background of direct seedinge4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“direct seeding of spring durum wheat bezenchukskaya Zolotistaya (soy precursor), on ordinary chernozem in 2017-2019”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–207 · show in text ↑
e4

“The highest net income and profitability were revealed against the background of direct seeding and the use of ammonium nitrate – 8327.8-8532.0 rubles / ha and 70.7-80.7 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1047 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct seeding with ammonium nitrate gave the highest profitability, 70.7-80.7 %.

Taxon
spring durum wheatTriticum turgidum subsp. durume0
Treatment
ammonium nitratee4
Outcome
profitabilitye4
Direction
higheste4
Value
70.7-80.7 %e4
Qualifier
against the background of direct seedinge4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“direct seeding of spring durum wheat bezenchukskaya Zolotistaya (soy precursor), on ordinary chernozem in 2017-2019”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–207 · show in text ↑
e4

“The highest net income and profitability were revealed against the background of direct seeding and the use of ammonium nitrate – 8327.8-8532.0 rubles / ha and 70.7-80.7 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1047 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend introducing ammonium nitrate (N30) at sowing when cultivating new spring durum wheat varieties.

Taxon
spring durum wheatTriticum turgidum subsp. durume0
Treatment
ammonium nitrate (N30)e5
Outcome
introduce ammonium nitrate (N30) during the sowing periode5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“direct seeding of spring durum wheat bezenchukskaya Zolotistaya (soy precursor), on ordinary chernozem in 2017-2019”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–207 · show in text ↑
e5

“it is recommended to introduce ammonium nitrate (N30) during the sowing period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1204 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors state that fungicide use is rational only in years favorable for moisture.

Taxon
spring durum wheatTriticum turgidum subsp. durume0
Outcome
use of fungicidese6
Qualifier
in years favorable for moisturee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“direct seeding of spring durum wheat bezenchukskaya Zolotistaya (soy precursor), on ordinary chernozem in 2017-2019”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–207 · show in text ↑
e6

“The use of fungicides is rational to carry out in years favorable for moisture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1376 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Against biofungicide Phytosporin, the authors judge fungicide use not advisable.

Taxon
spring durum wheatTriticum turgidum subsp. durume0
Treatment
biofungicide Phytosporine7
Outcome
use of fungicides is not advisablee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“direct seeding of spring durum wheat bezenchukskaya Zolotistaya (soy precursor), on ordinary chernozem in 2017-2019”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–207 · show in text ↑
e7

“Against the background of the use of biofungicide Phytosporin, the use of fungicides is not advisable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1479 · show in text ↑

ammonium nitrate · yield · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fungicide · yield · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.