Paper · 1972 · Weed Science

Preplant Atrazine Applications on Sorghum

G. A. Wicks; O. C. Burnside

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Experiments were conducted at Lincoln and North Platte, Nebraska, during 1967 and 1968 to determine the effect of early preplant applications of 2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6-(isopropylamino)- s -triazine (atrazine) on sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench ‘Nebraska 505′] and weed yields. Atrazine at 2.24 kg/ha was applied on separate plots preplant and incorporated about April 15, April 30, and May 15, and also preemergence without incorporation about May 17, after sorghum was planted. Sorghum grain yields were highest on plots where atrazine was applied preemergence rather than preplant due mainly to better weed control. Sorghum planted with planter units equipped with furrow openers, set to remove 2.5 to 5 cm of surface soil, had better sorghum stands and smaller weed yields than sorghum planted without removing surface soil. Sorghum population was the lowest following the April 30 atrazine application due to stand loss at North Platte, but grain yields were not significantly different from other preplant treatments since stand loss was compensated for by more heads per plant, larger heads, and larger seed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum grain yields were highest where atrazine was applied preemergence rather than preplant, due mainly to better weed control.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore0
Material
Nebraska 505e0
Treatment
atrazine was applied preemergencee1
Outcome
grain yieldse1
Direction
higheste1
Qualifier
due mainly to better weed controle1
Comparator
preplante1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench ‘Nebraska 505′] and weed yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–284 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sorghum grain yields were highest on plots where atrazine was applied preemergence rather than preplant due mainly to better weed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The April 30 atrazine application gave the lowest sorghum population at North Platte, due to stand loss.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
April 30 atrazine applicatione2
Outcome
Sorghum populatione2
Direction
loweste2
Qualifier
due to stand losse2
Setting
North Plattee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench ‘Nebraska 505′] and weed yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–284 · show in text ↑
e2

“Sorghum population was the lowest following the April 30 atrazine application due to stand loss at North Platte”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–948 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yields after preplant treatments did not differ significantly, as stand loss was compensated by more heads, larger heads and larger seed.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
preplante3
Outcome
grain yieldse3
Direction
not significantly differente3
Qualifier
since stand loss was compensated for by more heads per plant, larger heads, and larger seede3
Comparator
other preplant treatmentse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench ‘Nebraska 505′] and weed yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–284 · show in text ↑
e3

“but grain yields were not significantly different from other preplant treatments since stand loss was compensated for by more heads per plant, larger heads, and larger seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Furrow openers that removed 2.5 to 5 cm of surface soil gave better sorghum stands than planting without removing soil.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
furrow openers, set to remove 2.5 to 5 cm of surface soile4
Outcome
sorghum standse4
Direction
bettere4
Comparator
sorghum planted without removing surface soile4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench ‘Nebraska 505′] and weed yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–284 · show in text ↑
e4

“Sorghum planted with planter units equipped with furrow openers, set to remove 2.5 to 5 cm of surface soil, had better sorghum stands and smaller weed yields than sorghum planted without removing surface soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–835 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Furrow openers that removed 2.5 to 5 cm of surface soil gave smaller weed yields than planting without removing soil.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
furrow openers, set to remove 2.5 to 5 cm of surface soile4
Outcome
weed yieldse4
Direction
smallere4
Comparator
sorghum planted without removing surface soile4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench ‘Nebraska 505′] and weed yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–284 · show in text ↑
e4

“Sorghum planted with planter units equipped with furrow openers, set to remove 2.5 to 5 cm of surface soil, had better sorghum stands and smaller weed yields than sorghum planted without removing surface soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–835 · show in text ↑

atrazine · yield · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results differ

25 papers: 19 positive, 6 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

atrazine · pest · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

herbicide · yield · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results differ

37 papers: 27 positive, 10 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

irrigation · organism · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.