Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Effect of integrated nutrient management on yield and yield-attributing characters of wheat (Triticum aestivum)

TULASA RAM; MS. MIR

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the rainy (kharif) season of 2002 and 2003 to study the effect of dif- ferent levels of organic manure (FYM) and inorganic fertilizers with different biofertilizer strains on wheat (Tn'ti- cum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.). Application of 10 tonnes FYM + 120 kg Nlha significantly increased plant height, effective tillerslm row length, grainslspike, grain and straw yields over the control and 10 tonnes FYM + 100 kg Nlha during both the years. Both biofertilizers, i.e. Azospirillum and Azotobacter, significantly enhanced all the growth parameters and grain and straw yields over the control. Combined application of Azospirillum + Azotobacter showed significant improvement over their individual application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

10 t FYM + 120 kg N/ha significantly increased plant height, effective tillers per m row length and grains per spike over the control and 10 t FYM + 100 kg N/ha.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
10 tonnes FYM + 120 kg Nlhae1
Outcome
plant height, effective tillerslm row length, grainslspikee1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
control and 10 tonnes FYM + 100 kg Nlhae1
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted during the rainy (kharif) season of 2002 and 2003”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of 10 tonnes FYM + 120 kg Nlha significantly increased plant height, effective tillerslm row length, grainslspike, grain and straw yields over the control and 10 tonnes FYM + 100 kg Nlha during both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–488 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

10 t FYM + 120 kg N/ha significantly increased grain and straw yields over the control and 10 t FYM + 100 kg N/ha.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
10 tonnes FYM + 120 kg Nlhae1
Outcome
grain and straw yieldse1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
control and 10 tonnes FYM + 100 kg Nlhae1
Setting
field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted during the rainy (kharif) season of 2002 and 2003”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of 10 tonnes FYM + 120 kg Nlha significantly increased plant height, effective tillerslm row length, grainslspike, grain and straw yields over the control and 10 tonnes FYM + 100 kg Nlha during both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–488 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Azospirillum and Azotobacter biofertilizers significantly enhanced wheat growth parameters over the control.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Both biofertilizerse2
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume2symbiont
Second interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere2symbiont
Outcome
growth parameterse2
Direction
enhancede2
Comparator
the controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–111 · show in text ↑
e2

“Both biofertilizers, i.e. Azospirillum and Azotobacter, significantly enhanced all the growth parameters and grain and straw yields over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–638 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Azospirillum and Azotobacter biofertilizers significantly enhanced wheat grain and straw yields over the control.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Both biofertilizerse2
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume2symbiont
Second interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere2symbiont
Outcome
grain and straw yieldse2
Direction
enhancede2
Comparator
the controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–111 · show in text ↑
e2

“Both biofertilizers, i.e. Azospirillum and Azotobacter, significantly enhanced all the growth parameters and grain and straw yields over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–638 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Azospirillum + Azotobacter application gave a significant improvement over their individual application.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Combined application of Azospirillum + Azotobactere3
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume3symbiont
Second interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere3symbiont
Outcome
improvemente3
Direction
improvemente3
Comparator
their individual applicatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–111 · show in text ↑
e3

“Combined application of Azospirillum + Azotobacter showed significant improvement over their individual application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–755 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Azospirillum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

fertilization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

755 papers: 663 positive, 92 negative or no effect

662 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

751 papers more in this group

See all 755 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.