Paper · 1993 · Pesticide Research Journal

Effect of Insecticidal Schedules on Intermittent Population of Jassid and Whitefly and Yield of Cotton

R. S. Singh; G.P. Gupta

8
claims
29
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field trials were conducted during 1988 and 1989 crop season at the Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, to study the impact of different insecticidal schedules on intermittant population of jassid and population build-up in whitefly in American and barbadense eotton nnd dield do seed cotton. Result shows that a 4-spray schedule (dimethoate, monocrotophos, cypermethrin and endosulfan) during less pest population and a 5-spray schedule (dimethoate, monocrotophos, cypermethrin, endosulfan and fenpropathrin) during high pest population were effective in suppressing intermittant population of jassid without build-up in whitefly population beyond economic threshold level and increasing the yield of seed cotton m both the cotton races. Insecticidal schedule consisting of either 4 or 5 sprays of only conventional insecticides was not effective against pest complex of cotton, rather it was disadvantageous to cotton growers to depend on such schedule.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

a 4-spray schedule suppressing intermittant population of jassid.

Treatment
a 4-spray schedule (dimethoate, monocrotophos, cypermethrin and endosulfan) during less pest populatione0
Interactor
jasside1pest
Outcome
intermittant population of jasside1
Direction
suppressinge1
Setting
New Delhie3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a 4-spray schedule (dimethoate, monocrotophos, cypermethrin and endosulfan) during less pest population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–429 · show in text ↑
e1

“were effective in suppressing intermittant population of jassid without build-up in whitefly population beyond economic threshold level and increasing the yield of seed cotton m both the cotton races”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–752 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–102 · show in text ↑
e3

“Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

a 4-spray schedule without build-up whitefly population.

Treatment
a 4-spray schedule (dimethoate, monocrotophos, cypermethrin and endosulfan) during less pest populatione0
Interactor
whiteflye1pest
Outcome
whitefly populatione1
Direction
without build-upe1
Setting
New Delhie3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a 4-spray schedule (dimethoate, monocrotophos, cypermethrin and endosulfan) during less pest population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–429 · show in text ↑
e1

“were effective in suppressing intermittant population of jassid without build-up in whitefly population beyond economic threshold level and increasing the yield of seed cotton m both the cotton races”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–752 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–102 · show in text ↑
e3

“Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

a 4-spray schedule increasing yield of seed cotton.

Treatment
a 4-spray schedule (dimethoate, monocrotophos, cypermethrin and endosulfan) during less pest populatione0
Outcome
yield of seed cottone1
Direction
increasinge1
Setting
New Delhie3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a 4-spray schedule (dimethoate, monocrotophos, cypermethrin and endosulfan) during less pest population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–429 · show in text ↑
e1

“were effective in suppressing intermittant population of jassid without build-up in whitefly population beyond economic threshold level and increasing the yield of seed cotton m both the cotton races”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–752 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–102 · show in text ↑
e3

“Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

a 5-spray schedule suppressing intermittant population of jassid.

Treatment
a 5-spray schedule (dimethoate, monocrotophos, cypermethrin, endosulfan and fenpropathrin) during high pest populatione0
Interactor
jasside1pest
Outcome
intermittant population of jasside1
Direction
suppressinge1
Setting
New Delhie3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a 5-spray schedule (dimethoate, monocrotophos, cypermethrin, endosulfan and fenpropathrin) during high pest population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–552 · show in text ↑
e1

“were effective in suppressing intermittant population of jassid without build-up in whitefly population beyond economic threshold level and increasing the yield of seed cotton m both the cotton races”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–752 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–102 · show in text ↑
e3

“Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

a 5-spray schedule without build-up whitefly population.

Treatment
a 5-spray schedule (dimethoate, monocrotophos, cypermethrin, endosulfan and fenpropathrin) during high pest populatione0
Interactor
whiteflye1pest
Outcome
whitefly populatione1
Direction
without build-upe1
Setting
New Delhie3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a 5-spray schedule (dimethoate, monocrotophos, cypermethrin, endosulfan and fenpropathrin) during high pest population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–552 · show in text ↑
e1

“were effective in suppressing intermittant population of jassid without build-up in whitefly population beyond economic threshold level and increasing the yield of seed cotton m both the cotton races”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–752 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–102 · show in text ↑
e3

“Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

a 5-spray schedule increasing yield of seed cotton.

Treatment
a 5-spray schedule (dimethoate, monocrotophos, cypermethrin, endosulfan and fenpropathrin) during high pest populatione0
Outcome
yield of seed cottone1
Direction
increasinge1
Setting
New Delhie3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a 5-spray schedule (dimethoate, monocrotophos, cypermethrin, endosulfan and fenpropathrin) during high pest population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–552 · show in text ↑
e1

“were effective in suppressing intermittant population of jassid without build-up in whitefly population beyond economic threshold level and increasing the yield of seed cotton m both the cotton races”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–752 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–102 · show in text ↑
e3

“Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional-only insecticide schedules were ineffective against the cotton pest complex.

Treatment
only conventional insecticidese0
Outcome
pest complex of cottone0
Direction
not effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Insecticidal schedule consisting of either 4 or 5 sprays of only conventional insecticides was not effective against pest complex of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–102 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors considered dependence on conventional-only insecticide schedules disadvantageous for cotton growers.

Outcome
disadvantageous to cotton growers to depend on such schedulee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it was disadvantageous to cotton growers to depend on such schedule”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–969 · show in text ↑
e1

“Insecticidal schedule consisting of either 4 or 5 sprays of only conventional insecticides was not effective against pest complex of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–102 · show in text ↑

endosulfan · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

dimethoate · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

endosulfan · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

monocrotophos · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

dimethoate · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

monocrotophos · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

fenpropathrin · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fenpropathrin · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.