Paper · 1995 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Management of Malformation in American Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)

O. P. Nehra; S. S. Pahuja; HK Sharma

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Foliar spray of specific sample of expiry-date monocrotophos on flowering hirsutum cotton plants @ 5 mill induced the maximum adverse effect on plant height, swelling in stem, number of affected leaves and branches, dry matter accumulation, total number of bolls, number of opened bolls per plant and seed cotton yield both per plant and per ha. 2,4-D@ 5 g/ha and expiry-date dimethoate@4 ml/l injured these characters of cotton plants in descending order of magnitude. Clipping followed by foliar spray of ZnSO4 (0.5% +0.25% CaO) was found to be the most effective treatment for alleviating the plants phytotoxicity induced by 2, 4-D and expiry-date dimethoate. Plants did not recover till harvest by any of the seven remedial treatments under expiry-date monocrotophos.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Expiry-date monocrotophos foliar spray had the maximum adverse effect on plant height, stem swelling, and affected leaves and branches

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
Foliar spray of specific sample of expiry-date monocrotophose1
Outcome
plant height, swelling in stem, number of affected leaves and branchese1
Direction
maximum adverse effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management of Malformation in American Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e1

“Foliar spray of specific sample of expiry-date monocrotophos on flowering hirsutum cotton plants @ 5 mill induced the maximum adverse effect on plant height, swelling in stem, number of affected leaves and branches, dry matter accumulation, total number of bolls, number of opened bolls per plant and seed cotton yield both per plant and per ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Expiry-date monocrotophos foliar spray had the maximum adverse effect on dry matter accumulation, total bolls and opened bolls per plant

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
Foliar spray of specific sample of expiry-date monocrotophose1
Outcome
dry matter accumulation, total number of bolls, number of opened bolls per plante1
Direction
maximum adverse effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management of Malformation in American Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e1

“Foliar spray of specific sample of expiry-date monocrotophos on flowering hirsutum cotton plants @ 5 mill induced the maximum adverse effect on plant height, swelling in stem, number of affected leaves and branches, dry matter accumulation, total number of bolls, number of opened bolls per plant and seed cotton yield both per plant and per ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Expiry-date monocrotophos foliar spray had the maximum adverse effect on seed cotton yield per plant and per hectare

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
Foliar spray of specific sample of expiry-date monocrotophose1
Outcome
seed cotton yield both per plant and per hae1
Direction
maximum adverse effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management of Malformation in American Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e1

“Foliar spray of specific sample of expiry-date monocrotophos on flowering hirsutum cotton plants @ 5 mill induced the maximum adverse effect on plant height, swelling in stem, number of affected leaves and branches, dry matter accumulation, total number of bolls, number of opened bolls per plant and seed cotton yield both per plant and per ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2,4-D at 5 g/ha injured cotton plant characters

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
2,4-D@ 5 g/hae2
Outcome
these characterse2
Direction
injurede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management of Malformation in American Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e2

“2,4-D@ 5 g/ha and expiry-date dimethoate@4 ml/l injured these characters of cotton plants in descending order of magnitude”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–468 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Expiry-date dimethoate at 4 ml/l injured cotton plant characters

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
expiry-date dimethoate@4 ml/le2
Outcome
these characterse2
Direction
injurede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management of Malformation in American Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e2

“2,4-D@ 5 g/ha and expiry-date dimethoate@4 ml/l injured these characters of cotton plants in descending order of magnitude”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–468 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clipping followed by foliar ZnSO4 spray was the most effective treatment for alleviating phytotoxicity induced by 2,4-D and dimethoate

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
Clipping followed by foliar spray of ZnSO4 (0.5% +0.25% CaO)e3
Outcome
alleviating the plants phytotoxicitye3
Direction
most effectivee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management of Malformation in American Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e3

“Clipping followed by foliar spray of ZnSO4 (0.5% +0.25% CaO) was found to be the most effective treatment for alleviating the plants phytotoxicity induced by 2, 4-D and expiry-date dimethoate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

None of the seven remedial treatments let cotton plants recover from expiry-date monocrotophos injury by harvest

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
any of the seven remedial treatmentse4
Outcome
recover till harveste4
Direction
did not recovere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management of Malformation in American Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
e4

“Plants did not recover till harvest by any of the seven remedial treatments under expiry-date monocrotophos”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–770 · show in text ↑

monocrotophos · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

monocrotophos · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

application · crop injury · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

115 papers: 96 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 96 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

111 papers more in this group

See all 115 papers →

application · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 253 positive, 30 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 253 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

279 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.