Paper · 2004 · Agricultural science digest

EVALUATION OF PROMISING SORGHUM GENOTYPES FOR THEIR YIELD AND QUALITY

V. V. Gabhane; S. S. Wanjari; K.P. Dhamdhere

4
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the kharif season of 1999–2000. For obtaining higher grain and fodder yield, better protein content, application of 80 kg N + 40 kg P 2O 5 ha −1 was found to be the best. The most promising genotypes in respect of yield and protein content are SPH-964 and SPH-981, and most promising genotype in respect of reducing and non-reducing sugar content is CSV-15.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 80 kg N + 40 kg P2O5 per hectare gave higher grain and fodder yield in sorghum.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
80 kg N + 40 kg P 2O 5e1
Outcome
grain and fodder yielde1
Direction
highere1
Setting
field experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PROMISING SORGHUM GENOTYPES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted during the kharif season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“For obtaining higher grain and fodder yield, better protein content, application of 80 kg N + 40 kg P 2O 5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 80 kg N + 40 kg P2O5 per hectare gave better protein content in sorghum.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
80 kg N + 40 kg P 2O 5e1
Outcome
protein contente1
Direction
bettere1
Setting
field experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PROMISING SORGHUM GENOTYPES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted during the kharif season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“For obtaining higher grain and fodder yield, better protein content, application of 80 kg N + 40 kg P 2O 5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–178 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SPH-964 and SPH-981 were the most promising sorghum genotypes for yield and protein content.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Material
SPH-964 and SPH-981e2
Outcome
yield and protein contente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PROMISING SORGHUM GENOTYPES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–41 · show in text ↑
e2

“The most promising genotypes in respect of yield and protein content are SPH-964 and SPH-981”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–303 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CSV-15 was the most promising sorghum genotype for reducing and non-reducing sugar content.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Material
CSV-15e3
Outcome
reducing and non-reducing sugar contente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PROMISING SORGHUM GENOTYPES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–41 · show in text ↑
e3

“most promising genotype in respect of reducing and non-reducing sugar content is CSV-15”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–396 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: protein · SorghumResults differ

47 papers: 43 positive, 4 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

nitrogen · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

290 papers: 264 positive, 26 negative or no effect

263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

286 papers more in this group

See all 290 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.