Paper · 2014 · Trends in Biosciences/Trends in biosciences

Influence of Seed Rate and Fertilizer Levels on Dry Matter Distribution and Dry Matter Yield of Fodder Cowpea (cv. Swad)

M. R. Bhavya; Y. B. Palled; Pushpalatha; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at the Main Agricultural Research Station, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad in Northern Transition Zone of Karnataka on red sandy loams oil to study the influence ofseed rate and fertilizer levels on dry matter accumulation and dry matter yield of fodder cowpea during kharif 2011. The experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design with 12 treatment combinations consisting of four seed rates (30, 40, 50 and 60 kg ha−1) and three levels of fertilizer (15: 30, 25:50, 35: 70 kg N: P2O5 ha−1). A seed rate of 30 kg ha−1 recorded significantly higher dry weight of leaves plant−1, stem and total dry weight of plant at 20, 40 DAS and at harvest. Even though, per plant yield was significantly higher in lower seed rate (S1) due to lower plant population ha−1 significantly less dry matter yield (5.21 t ha−1) was recorded compared to S3 (5.34 t ha−1). A fertilizer level of 25 kg N and 50 kg P2O5 ha−1 recorded significantly higher dry weight of leaves plant−1, stem and total dry weight of plant at 40 DAS and at harvest, and also significantly higher dry matter yield ha−1 (5.35 t ha−1) was observed. A treatment combination of 25 kgN and 50 kg P2O5 ha−1 with a seed rate of 50 kg ha−1 recorded numericaly higher dry matter yield (5.52 t ha−1) compared to other treatment combinations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A seed rate of 30 kg ha−1 gave significantly higher dry weights of leaves, stem and total plant at 20, 40 DAS and harvest.

Taxon
Fodder Cowpeat0
Material
Swadt0
Treatment
seed rate of 30 kg ha−1e1
Outcome
dry weight of leaves plant−1, stem and total dry weight of plante1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“A seed rate of 30 kg ha−1 recorded significantly higher dry weight of leaves plant−1, stem and total dry weight of plant at 20, 40 DAS and at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–701 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fodder Cowpea (cv. Swad)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Per plant yield was significantly higher in the lower seed rate (S1).

Taxon
Fodder Cowpeat0
Material
Swadt0
Treatment
lower seed rate (S1)e2
Outcome
per plant yielde2
Direction
highere2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“Even though, per plant yield was significantly higher in lower seed rate (S1) due to lower plant population ha−1 significantly less dry matter yield (5.21 t ha−1) was recorded compared to S3 (5.34 t ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–907 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fodder Cowpea (cv. Swad)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The lower seed rate (S1) gave significantly less dry matter yield (5.21 t ha−1) than S3.

Taxon
Fodder Cowpeat0
Material
Swadt0
Treatment
lower seed rate (S1)e2
Outcome
dry matter yielde2
Direction
lesse2
Value
5.21 t ha−1e2
Qualifier
5.34 t ha−1e2
Comparator
S3e2

Verbatim

e2

“Even though, per plant yield was significantly higher in lower seed rate (S1) due to lower plant population ha−1 significantly less dry matter yield (5.21 t ha−1) was recorded compared to S3 (5.34 t ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–907 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fodder Cowpea (cv. Swad)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A fertilizer level of 25 kg N and 50 kg P2O5 ha−1 gave significantly higher dry weights of leaves, stem and total plant at 40 DAS and harvest.

Taxon
Fodder Cowpeat0
Material
Swadt0
Treatment
25 kg N and 50 kg P2O5 ha−1e3
Outcome
dry weight of leaves plant−1, stem and total dry weight of plante3
Direction
highere3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e3

“A fertilizer level of 25 kg N and 50 kg P2O5 ha−1 recorded significantly higher dry weight of leaves plant−1, stem and total dry weight of plant at 40 DAS and at harvest, and also significantly higher dry matter yield ha−1 (5.35 t ha−1) was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1158 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fodder Cowpea (cv. Swad)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A fertilizer level of 25 kg N and 50 kg P2O5 ha−1 gave significantly higher dry matter yield of 5.35 t ha−1.

Taxon
Fodder Cowpeat0
Material
Swadt0
Treatment
25 kg N and 50 kg P2O5 ha−1e3
Outcome
dry matter yield ha−1e3
Direction
highere3
Value
5.35 t ha−1e3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e3

“A fertilizer level of 25 kg N and 50 kg P2O5 ha−1 recorded significantly higher dry weight of leaves plant−1, stem and total dry weight of plant at 40 DAS and at harvest, and also significantly higher dry matter yield ha−1 (5.35 t ha−1) was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1158 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fodder Cowpea (cv. Swad)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–120 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

56 papers: 52 positive, 4 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

113 papers: 107 positive, 6 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

109 papers more in this group

See all 113 papers →

density · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

density · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 50 positive, 13 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.