Abstract
The present study evaluated the effect of different night temperatures, CO2 levels and light intensities on plant appearance at the end of production and subsequent postharvest performance in Rosa hybrida 'Kiss' (miniature rose). In miniature rose the most pronounced difference at the end of production was in the number of flower buds, where plants grown at high light intensity and increased CO2-level had the highest number. The production time was not influenced by the tested light or CO2-levels, but the lower the night temperature, then the longer the production time. During the subsequent postharvest test the number of open flowers only differed slightly and differences were only significant around day 20 when plants grown at high light or increased CO2-level had more open flowers. Plants grown at low night temperature had a reduced quality after 29 days in a postharvest test, both in terms of number and percentage of open flowers.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
High light intensity and increased CO2 gave miniature rose plants the highest number of flower buds at the end of production.
- Taxon
- Rosa hybrida
Rosa hybrid cultivare0 - Treatment
- high light intensity and increased CO2-levele1
- Outcome
- number of flower budse2
- Direction
- higheste1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Rosa hybrida 'Kiss' (miniature rose)”
e1“plants grown at high light intensity and increased CO2-level had the highest number”
e2“the most pronounced difference at the end of production was in the number of flower buds”
Claim · model-written summary
Light and CO2 levels did not influence the production time of miniature rose.
- Taxon
- Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivare0
- Treatment
- tested light or CO2-levelse3
- Outcome
- production timee3
- Direction
- not influencede3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Rosa hybrida 'Kiss' (miniature rose)”
e3“The production time was not influenced by the tested light or CO2-levels”
Claim · model-written summary
Lower night temperature was associated with a longer production time in miniature rose.
- Taxon
- Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivare0
- Treatment
- night temperaturee4
- Outcome
- production timee4
- Direction
- longere4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Rosa hybrida 'Kiss' (miniature rose)”
e4“the lower the night temperature, then the longer the production time”
Claim · model-written summary
High light or increased CO2 gave more open flowers around day 20 of the postharvest test, a significant difference.
- Taxon
- Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivare0
- Treatment
- high light or increased CO2-levele5
- Outcome
- open flowerse5
- Direction
- moree5
- Qualifier
- around day 20e5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Rosa hybrida 'Kiss' (miniature rose)”
e5“differences were only significant around day 20 when plants grown at high light or increased CO2-level had more open flowers”
Claim · model-written summary
Low night temperature reduced the postharvest quality of miniature rose after 29 days.
- Taxon
- Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivare0
- Treatment
- low night temperaturee6
- Outcome
- qualitye6
- Direction
- reducede6
- Qualifier
- both in terms of number and percentage of open flowerse6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Rosa hybrida 'Kiss' (miniature rose)”
e6“Plants grown at low night temperature had a reduced quality after 29 days in a postharvest test, both in terms of number and percentage of open flowers”
The same questions in other papers
co2 · yield · Rosa hybrid cultivarPositive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
light · yield · Rosa hybrid cultivarPositive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →light · phenology · Rosa hybrid cultivarPositive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.