Paper · 2015 · Annals of Plant Protection Sciences

Farmer participatory assessment of bio-intensive IPM modules against Brinjal shoot and fruit borer, Leucinodes orbonslis Guenee

U. S. Nayak; S.K. Mohanty; Rajesh Kumar

9
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The result of two seasons trials revealed that IPM module (M4) comprising of soil incorporation of neem cake @ 2 Q/ha (50% at transplanting and 50% at 3 weeks after transplanting), alternate spraying of neem oil (300 ppm) @ 5 ml/l of water and Bt @ 2 g/l of water at 10 days interval, installation of pheromone traps from 30 DAT @ 70/ha and regular collection and destruction of infested plant parts was found to be highly effective in minimizing the BSFB infestation with the minimum shoot (7.8%), flower bud (6.4%) and fruit damage (8.8% & 10.8% on number and weight basis, respectively) in comparison to the farmers’ practice of indiscriminate application of different insecticides and ITK. The module M3 also offered a superior control of L. orbonalis and was found to be statistically similar with the efficacy of M4. While, the module M4 produced highest total (228.05 q/ha) and marketable fruit yield (209.69 q/ha) and M3 resulted in maximum net return ( 90,050.3) and B:C ratio (2.61).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M4 reduced shoot damage to 7.8% versus farmers’ practice.

Treatment
IPM module (M4)e0
Interactor
Leucinodes orbonslis Gueneet0pest
Outcome
shoote0
Direction
minimume0
Value
7.8%e0
Comparator
farmers’ practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IPM module (M4) comprising of soil incorporation of neem cake @ 2 Q/ha (50% at transplanting and 50% at 3 weeks after transplanting), alternate spraying of neem oil (300 ppm) @ 5 ml/l of water and Bt @ 2 g/l of water at 10 days interval, installation of pheromone traps from 30 DAT @ 70/ha and regular collection and destruction of infested plant parts was found to be highly effective in minimizing the BSFB infestation with the minimum shoot (7.8%), flower bud (6.4%) and fruit damage (8.8% & 10.8% on number and weight basis, respectively) in comparison to the farmers’ practice of indiscriminate application of different insecticides and ITK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–692 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brinjal shoot and fruit borer, Leucinodes orbonslis Guenee”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M4 reduced flower bud damage to 6.4% versus farmers’ practice.

Treatment
IPM module (M4)e1
Interactor
Leucinodes orbonslis Gueneet0pest
Outcome
flower bude0
Direction
minimume0
Value
6.4%e0
Comparator
farmers’ practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minimum shoot (7.8%), flower bud (6.4%) and fruit damage (8.8% & 10.8% on number and weight basis, respectively) in comparison to the farmers’ practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–628 · show in text ↑
e1

“IPM module (M4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–62 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brinjal shoot and fruit borer, Leucinodes orbonslis Guenee”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M4 minimized fruit damage by number to 8.8%.

Treatment
IPM module (M4)e1
Interactor
Leucinodes orbonslis Gueneet0pest
Outcome
fruit damagee0
Direction
minimume0
Value
8.8%e0
Qualifier
numbere0
Comparator
farmers’ practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minimum shoot (7.8%), flower bud (6.4%) and fruit damage (8.8% & 10.8% on number and weight basis, respectively) in comparison to the farmers’ practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–628 · show in text ↑
e1

“IPM module (M4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–62 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brinjal shoot and fruit borer, Leucinodes orbonslis Guenee”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M4 minimized fruit damage by weight to 10.8%.

Treatment
IPM module (M4)e1
Interactor
Leucinodes orbonslis Gueneet0pest
Outcome
fruit damagee0
Direction
minimume0
Value
10.8%e0
Qualifier
weighte0
Comparator
farmers’ practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minimum shoot (7.8%), flower bud (6.4%) and fruit damage (8.8% & 10.8% on number and weight basis, respectively) in comparison to the farmers’ practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–628 · show in text ↑
e1

“IPM module (M4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–62 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brinjal shoot and fruit borer, Leucinodes orbonslis Guenee”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

M3 provided superior control of L. orbonalis, statistically similar to M4.

Treatment
module M3e0
Interactor
L. orbonalisLeucinodes orbonalise0pest
Outcome
control of L. orbonalise0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
M4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Leucinodes orbonalis
Leucinodes orbonalis · InteractorDonald Hobern · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The module M3 also offered a superior control of L. orbonalis and was found to be statistically similar with the efficacy of M4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–821 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M4 had the highest total fruit yield at 228.05 q/ha.

Treatment
module M4e0
Outcome
totale0
Direction
higheste0
Value
228.05 q/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“module M4 produced highest total (228.05 q/ha) and marketable fruit yield (209.69 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–921 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M4 had the highest marketable fruit yield at 209.69 q/ha.

Treatment
module M4e0
Outcome
marketable fruit yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
209.69 q/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“module M4 produced highest total (228.05 q/ha) and marketable fruit yield (209.69 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–921 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M3 had the maximum net return of 90,050.3.

Treatment
M3e0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
maximume0
Value
90,050.3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“M3 resulted in maximum net return ( 90,050.3) and B:C ratio (2.61)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–992 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M3 had the maximum B:C ratio of 2.61.

Treatment
M3e0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
2.61e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“M3 resulted in maximum net return ( 90,050.3) and B:C ratio (2.61)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–992 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–76 · show in text ↑

ipm · growth · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

ipm · pest · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.