Abstract
Experiments were conducted at National Pulses Research Centre, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Vamban during kharif 2006 to study the efficacy of moncrotophos, γ-cyhalothrin, triazophos, profenophos, indoxacarb, bifenthrin, spinosad, endosulfan, novaluron, Bt and NSKE against spotted pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Geyer) in short duration pigeonpea variety Aruppukkottai 1. First spraying was given at 50% flowering (80 DAS) and second 15 days later. Spraying of spinosad (0.045%) and indoxacarb (0.015%) attributed to higher yield and lesser larval incidence when compared to other treatments. Among biorationals, novaluron (0.01%) provided good protectton and registered significantly lesser incidence of Maruca larvae and higher yield over control. The effecttve control of M. vitrata was manifested with the marked increase in grain yields which were 1130.3, 1118.0, 1015.3, 982.0 and 965.7 kg ha−1 in spinosad, indoxacarb, γ-cyhalothrin, endosulfan and monocrotophos treatments, respectively, as against 401.0 kg ha−1 in untreated control. The extent of yield increase in these treatments was 240.8–281.8% over control.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad gave higher yield than other treatments.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajant0 - Treatment
- spinosad (0.045%)e0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Spraying of spinosad (0.045%) and indoxacarb (0.015%) attributed to higher yield and lesser larval incidence when compared to other treatments.”
t0“Pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Indoxacarb gave higher yield than other treatments.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- indoxacarb (0.015%)e0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Spraying of spinosad (0.045%) and indoxacarb (0.015%) attributed to higher yield and lesser larval incidence when compared to other treatments.”
t0“Pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad reduced larval incidence relative to other treatments.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- spinosad (0.045%)e0
- Interactor
- Maruca vitrata
Maruca vitratat0pest - Outcome
- larval incidencee0
- Direction
- lessere0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Spraying of spinosad (0.045%) and indoxacarb (0.015%) attributed to higher yield and lesser larval incidence when compared to other treatments.”
t0“Maruca vitrata (Geyer) in Short Duration Pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Indoxacarb reduced larval incidence relative to other treatments.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- indoxacarb (0.015%)e0
- Interactor
- Maruca vitrataMaruca vitratat0pest
- Outcome
- larval incidencee0
- Direction
- lessere0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Spraying of spinosad (0.045%) and indoxacarb (0.015%) attributed to higher yield and lesser larval incidence when compared to other treatments.”
t0“Maruca vitrata (Geyer) in Short Duration Pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Novaluron significantly reduced Maruca larval incidence over control.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- novaluron (0.01%)e0
- Outcome
- incidence of Maruca larvaee0
- Direction
- lessere0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“novaluron (0.01%) provided good protectton and registered significantly lesser incidence of Maruca larvae and higher yield over control”
t0“Pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Novaluron raised yield over control.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- novaluron (0.01%)e0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“novaluron (0.01%) provided good protectton and registered significantly lesser incidence of Maruca larvae and higher yield over control”
t0“Pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
spinosad treatment yielded 1130.3 versus untreated control.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- spinosade0
- Outcome
- grain yieldse0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 1130.3e0
- Qualifier
- 401.0 kg ha−1e0
- Comparator
- untreated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The effecttve control of M. vitrata was manifested with the marked increase in grain yields which were 1130.3, 1118.0, 1015.3, 982.0 and 965.7 kg ha−1 in spinosad, indoxacarb, γ-cyhalothrin, endosulfan and monocrotophos treatments, respectively, as against 401.0 kg ha−1 in untreated control.”
t0“Pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
indoxacarb treatment yielded 1118.0 versus untreated control.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- indoxacarbe0
- Outcome
- grain yieldse0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 1118.0e0
- Qualifier
- 401.0 kg ha−1e0
- Comparator
- untreated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The effecttve control of M. vitrata was manifested with the marked increase in grain yields which were 1130.3, 1118.0, 1015.3, 982.0 and 965.7 kg ha−1 in spinosad, indoxacarb, γ-cyhalothrin, endosulfan and monocrotophos treatments, respectively, as against 401.0 kg ha−1 in untreated control.”
t0“Pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
γ-cyhalothrin treatment yielded 1015.3 versus untreated control.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- γ-cyhalothrine0
- Outcome
- grain yieldse0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 1015.3e0
- Qualifier
- 401.0 kg ha−1e0
- Comparator
- untreated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The effecttve control of M. vitrata was manifested with the marked increase in grain yields which were 1130.3, 1118.0, 1015.3, 982.0 and 965.7 kg ha−1 in spinosad, indoxacarb, γ-cyhalothrin, endosulfan and monocrotophos treatments, respectively, as against 401.0 kg ha−1 in untreated control.”
t0“Pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
endosulfan treatment yielded 982.0 versus untreated control.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- endosulfane0
- Outcome
- grain yieldse0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 982.0e0
- Qualifier
- 401.0 kg ha−1e0
- Comparator
- untreated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The effecttve control of M. vitrata was manifested with the marked increase in grain yields which were 1130.3, 1118.0, 1015.3, 982.0 and 965.7 kg ha−1 in spinosad, indoxacarb, γ-cyhalothrin, endosulfan and monocrotophos treatments, respectively, as against 401.0 kg ha−1 in untreated control.”
t0“Pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
monocrotophos treatment yielded 965.7 versus untreated control.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- monocrotophose0
- Outcome
- grain yieldse0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 965.7e0
- Qualifier
- 401.0 kg ha−1e0
- Comparator
- untreated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The effecttve control of M. vitrata was manifested with the marked increase in grain yields which were 1130.3, 1118.0, 1015.3, 982.0 and 965.7 kg ha−1 in spinosad, indoxacarb, γ-cyhalothrin, endosulfan and monocrotophos treatments, respectively, as against 401.0 kg ha−1 in untreated control.”
t0“Pigeonpea”
The same questions in other papers
novaluron · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
indoxacarb · Maruca vitrata · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
endosulfan · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
spinosad · Maruca vitrata · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →monocrotophos · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →indoxacarb · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree
15 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →spinosad · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree
16 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.