Paper · 2012 · Madras Agricultural Journal

Influence of Foliar Nutrition on Seed Cotton Yield and Quality of Bt Cotton

Saravanan M; Venkitaswamy R; Rajendran K

4
claims
12
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted from August 2008 to January 2009 at Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore to find out the influence of foliar application of nutrition on yield attributes, yield and fibre quality of Bt cotton. The experiment was laid out in a randomized block design (RBD), replicated thrice. The treatments were T 1 - Urea - (1.5 %), T 2 - Diammonium phosphate (DAP) - (2 %), T 3 - Potassium chloride (KCl) - (2 %), T 4 - Potassium nitrate (KNO 3 ) - (3 %), T 5 - Potassium sulphate (K2 SO 4 ) - (1.5 %), T 6 - Polyfeed – (1.5 %) + Multi K - (1.5 %), T 7 - Zinc Sulphate (ZnSO 4 ) – (0.5 %), T 8 - Boron (solubar) - (0.2 %), T9 - Control. The results revealed that foliar application of Polyfeed (1.5 %) + Multi K (1.5 %) recorded significantly higher yield and better fibre quality such as ginning percentage, lint index, staple length, micronaire value, uniformity ratio, seed index, elongation percentage and tenacity at stray flowering and boll formation stages. Foliar nutrients significantly altered ginning percentage and lint index in Bt cotton.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of Polyfeed (1.5 %) + Multi K (1.5 %) gave significantly higher yield of Bt cotton than the control.

Taxon
Bt Cottont0
Treatment
foliar application of Polyfeed (1.5 %) + Multi K (1.5 %)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Controle2

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of Polyfeed (1.5 %) + Multi K (1.5 %) recorded significantly higher yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–784 · show in text ↑
e2

“T9 - Control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–664 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Polyfeed (1.5 %) + Multi K (1.5 %) gave better ginning percentage, lint index and staple length in Bt cotton than the control.

Taxon
Bt Cottont0
Treatment
foliar application of Polyfeed (1.5 %) + Multi K (1.5 %)e0
Outcome
ginning percentage, lint index, staple lengthe0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
Controle2

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of Polyfeed (1.5 %) + Multi K (1.5 %) recorded significantly higher yield and better fibre quality such as ginning percentage, lint index, staple length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–863 · show in text ↑
e2

“T9 - Control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–664 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Polyfeed (1.5 %) + Multi K (1.5 %) gave better micronaire value, uniformity ratio and seed index in Bt cotton than the control.

Taxon
Bt Cottont0
Treatment
foliar application of Polyfeed (1.5 %) + Multi K (1.5 %)e0
Outcome
micronaire value, uniformity ratio, seed indexe0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
Controle2

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of Polyfeed (1.5 %) + Multi K (1.5 %) recorded significantly higher yield and better fibre quality such as ginning percentage, lint index, staple length, micronaire value, uniformity ratio, seed index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–911 · show in text ↑
e2

“T9 - Control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–664 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Polyfeed (1.5 %) + Multi K (1.5 %) gave better elongation percentage and tenacity in Bt cotton than the control.

Taxon
Bt Cottont0
Treatment
foliar application of Polyfeed (1.5 %) + Multi K (1.5 %)e0
Outcome
elongation percentage and tenacitye0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
Controle2

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of Polyfeed (1.5 %) + Multi K (1.5 %) recorded significantly higher yield and better fibre quality such as ginning percentage, lint index, staple length, micronaire value, uniformity ratio, seed index, elongation percentage and tenacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–947 · show in text ↑
e2

“T9 - Control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–664 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bt Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–75 · show in text ↑

application · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

77 papers: 58 positive, 19 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

application · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

115 papers: 96 positive, 19 negative or no effect

95 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

111 papers more in this group

See all 115 papers →

application · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 253 positive, 30 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

279 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.