Paper · 2008 · Agricultural science digest

Studies on the effect of fertilizer doses and row spacing on growth and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L)

Neeraj Verma; B.K. Pandey

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The field experiment were conducted during 2004-05. The results showed that the application of 25 kg nitrogen with 30 cm row spacing was significatly better to harvest the maximum production from chickpea from per unit area, whereas, the minimum yield and net income was found with control and 50 cm row spacing.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 25 kg nitrogen with 30 cm row spacing gave significantly maximum chickpea production per unit area.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
25 kg nitrogen with 30 cm row spacinge0
Outcome
production from chickpea from per unit areae0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of 25 kg nitrogen with 30 cm row spacing was significatly better to harvest the maximum production from chickpea from per unit area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–223 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control with 50 cm row spacing had minimum yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
control and 50 cm row spacinge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
minimume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the minimum yield and net income was found with control and 50 cm row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–311 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control with 50 cm row spacing had minimum net income.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
control and 50 cm row spacinge0
Outcome
net incomee0
Direction
minimume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the minimum yield and net income was found with control and 50 cm row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–311 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–89 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

102 papers: 93 positive, 9 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

density · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

71 papers: 64 positive, 7 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.