Paper · 2015 · Progressive Agriculture

Intercropping of root crops with chilli in charlands of Mymensingh

SA Begum; MS Zaman; ASMMR Khan

11
claims
16
verbatim quotes
11
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Adoption of intercropping may increases crop production instead of declining trend of agricultural land in Bangladesh. Thus, a field experiment on intercropping of root crops with chilli was executed at char area of Dori Bhabkhali in Mymensingh district during October 2014 to March 2015 to find out an appropriate intercrop for cultivation with chilli for higher productivity and maximum economic return. The experiment was consisted with five crop combinations viz., sole chilli, chilli + radish, chilli+ carrot, chilli + onion and chilli + garlic. Significantly the highest yield (green chilli) was obtained with sole chilli (10.26 t ha-1). Among the intercropping treatments, the highest chilli yield (10.31 tha-1) was obtained from chilli + garlic which were close to chilli + onion whereas the lowest (7.71 tha-1) was found in chilli + radish combination. Intercropping reduced 3 to 48 % chilli yield but total productivity as expressed by chilli equivalent yield increased by 80-135% over sole chilli due to the contribution of companion crops. The highest chilli equivalent yield (25.01 t ha-1), gross return (1250500 Tk ha-1), gross margin (1133500 Tk ha-1) and marginal benefit cost ratio (8.56) were obtained from chilli + garlic combination. Considering the experimental findings, chilli + garlic might be suitable combination for higher productivity and economic return.Progressive Agriculture 26 (2): 109-114, 2015

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole chilli yielded 10.26 t ha-1 green chilli, the reported highest yield.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
sole chillie0
Outcome
yield (green chilli)e0
Direction
higheste0
Value
10.26 t ha-1e0

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly the highest yield (green chilli) was obtained with sole chilli (10.26 t ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–643 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among intercrops, chilli plus garlic gave the highest chilli yield of 10.31 tha-1.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
chilli + garlice0
Outcome
chilli yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
10.31 tha-1e0

Verbatim

e0

“Among the intercropping treatments, the highest chilli yield (10.31 tha-1) was obtained from chilli + garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–752 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilli plus onion yielded close to chilli plus garlic.

Taxon
chillit0
Treatment
chilli + onione0
Outcome
chillit0
Direction
close toe0
Comparator
chilli + garlice0

Verbatim

e0

“chilli + garlic which were close to chilli + onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–787 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilli plus radish had the lowest chilli yield, 7.71 tha-1.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
chilli + radishe0
Outcome
chilli yielde1
Direction
loweste0
Value
7.71 tha-1e0

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest (7.71 tha-1) was found in chilli + radish combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–860 · show in text ↑
e1

“highest chilli yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–704 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced chilli yield by 3 to 48%.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
Intercroppinge0
Outcome
chilli yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
3 to 48 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping reduced 3 to 48 % chilli yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–906 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased chilli-equivalent yield by 80-135% over sole chilli.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
companion cropse0
Outcome
chilli equivalent yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
80-135%e0
Comparator
sole chillie0

Verbatim

e0

“total productivity as expressed by chilli equivalent yield increased by 80-135% over sole chilli due to the contribution of companion crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1050 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilli plus garlic gave the highest chilli-equivalent yield, 25.01 t ha-1.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
chilli + garlice0
Outcome
chilli equivalent yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
25.01 t ha-1e0

Verbatim

e0

“The highest chilli equivalent yield (25.01 t ha-1), gross return (1250500 Tk ha-1), gross margin (1133500 Tk ha-1) and marginal benefit cost ratio (8.56) were obtained from chilli + garlic combination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1253 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilli plus garlic gave the highest gross return, 1250500 Tk ha-1.

Taxon
chillit0
Treatment
chilli + garlice0
Outcome
gross returne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1250500 Tk ha-1e0

Verbatim

e0

“The highest chilli equivalent yield (25.01 t ha-1), gross return (1250500 Tk ha-1), gross margin (1133500 Tk ha-1) and marginal benefit cost ratio (8.56) were obtained from chilli + garlic combination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1253 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilli plus garlic gave the highest gross margin, 1133500 Tk ha-1.

Taxon
chillit0
Treatment
chilli + garlice0
Outcome
gross margine0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1133500 Tk ha-1e0

Verbatim

e0

“The highest chilli equivalent yield (25.01 t ha-1), gross return (1250500 Tk ha-1), gross margin (1133500 Tk ha-1) and marginal benefit cost ratio (8.56) were obtained from chilli + garlic combination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1253 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilli plus garlic gave the highest marginal benefit cost ratio, 8.56.

Taxon
chillit0
Treatment
chilli + garlice0
Outcome
marginal benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
8.56e0

Verbatim

e0

“The highest chilli equivalent yield (25.01 t ha-1), gross return (1250500 Tk ha-1), gross margin (1133500 Tk ha-1) and marginal benefit cost ratio (8.56) were obtained from chilli + garlic combination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1253 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–39 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors considered chilli plus garlic suitable for higher productivity and economic return.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
chilli + garlice0
Outcome
suitable combination for higher productivity and economic returne0

Verbatim

e0

“chilli + garlic might be suitable combination for higher productivity and economic return”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1382 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results differ

19 papers: 15 positive, 4 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.