Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Environment and Climate Change

Intercropping of Radish and Beetroot with Chilli under Prayagraj Agro-Climatic Conditions

Somya Pal; . Deepanshu; Urfi Fatmi

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment entitled “Intercropping of Radish and Beetroot with Chilli under Prayagraj Agro-climatic conditions” was conducted from August, 2021 to February, 2022 at the Horticulture Research Farm, Department of Horticulture, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design (RBD) with three replications and 12 treatments. The experiment consisted of six cropping combinations viz., sole chilli, sole radish, sole beetroot, chilli + radish, chilli+ beetroot, chilli + radish + beetroot. The highest yield (green chilli) was obtained from treatment T1 (sole chilli @ 100 % RDN) (13.09 t ha-1). Among the intercropping treatments, the highest chilli yield (12.62 t ha-1) was obtained from treatment T10 (chilli @ 50% RDN + radish @ 50% RDN) whereas the lowest (9.45 t ha-1) was found in treatment T6 (chilli @ 75% RDN + radish @ 12.5% RDN + beetroot @ 12.5% RDN). Intercropping reduced chilli yield but total chilli with intercrop yield increased over sole chilli due to the contribution of companion crops. The highest chilli along with intercrop yield (150.71 t ha-1), gross return (1101506 Rs. ha-1), net return (817969 Rs. ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (3.88) were obtained from treatment T12 (chilli @ 50% RDN + radish @ 25% RDN + beetroot @ 25% RDN). Considering the experimental findings, treatment T12 (chilli @ 50% RDN + radish @ 25% RDN + beetroot @ 25% RDN) found the most suitable combination for higher productivity and economic return under Prayagraj agro-climatic conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole chilli at 100 % RDN had the highest green chilli yield of 13.09 t ha-1.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
sole chilli @ 100 % RDNe0
Outcome
yield (green chilli)e0
Direction
higheste0
Value
13.09 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yield (green chilli) was obtained from treatment T1 (sole chilli @ 100 % RDN) (13.09 t ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–686 · show in text ↑
t0

“Intercropping of Radish and Beetroot with Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among intercropping treatments, chilli at 50% RDN with radish at 50% RDN gave the highest chilli yield, 12.62 t ha-1.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
chilli @ 50% RDN + radish @ 50% RDNe0
Outcome
chilli yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
12.62 t ha-1e0
Comparator
intercropping treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“Among the intercropping treatments, the highest chilli yield (12.62 t ha-1) was obtained from treatment T10 (chilli @ 50% RDN + radish @ 50% RDN)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–832 · show in text ↑
t0

“Intercropping of Radish and Beetroot with Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilli at 75% RDN with radish and beetroot at 12.5% RDN each gave the lowest chilli yield, 9.45 t ha-1.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
chilli @ 75% RDN + radish @ 12.5% RDN + beetroot @ 12.5% RDNe0
Outcome
chilli yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Value
9.45 t ha-1e0
Comparator
intercropping treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“Among the intercropping treatments, the highest chilli yield (12.62 t ha-1) was obtained from treatment T10 (chilli @ 50% RDN + radish @ 50% RDN) whereas the lowest (9.45 t ha-1) was found in treatment T6 (chilli @ 75% RDN + radish @ 12.5% RDN + beetroot @ 12.5% RDN)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–954 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced chilli yield relative to sole chilli.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
Intercroppinge0
Outcome
chilli yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
sole chillie0

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping reduced chilli yield but total chilli with intercrop yield increased over sole chilli due to the contribution of companion crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1099 · show in text ↑
t0

“Intercropping of Radish and Beetroot with Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total chilli with intercrop yield increased over sole chilli.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
intercrope0
Outcome
total chilli with intercrop yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
sole chillie0

Verbatim

e0

“total chilli with intercrop yield increased over sole chilli due to the contribution of companion crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1099 · show in text ↑
t0

“Intercropping of Radish and Beetroot with Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T12 had the highest chilli along with intercrop yield at 150.71 t ha-1.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
chilli @ 50% RDN + radish @ 25% RDN + beetroot @ 25% RDNe0
Outcome
chilli along with intercrop yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
150.71 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The highest chilli along with intercrop yield (150.71 t ha-1), gross return (1101506 Rs. ha-1), net return (817969 Rs. ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (3.88) were obtained from treatment T12 (chilli @ 50% RDN + radish @ 25% RDN + beetroot @ 25% RDN).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1347 · show in text ↑
t0

“Intercropping of Radish and Beetroot with Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T12 had the highest gross return at 1101506 Rs. ha-1.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
chilli @ 50% RDN + radish @ 25% RDN + beetroot @ 25% RDNe0
Outcome
gross returne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1101506 Rs. ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The highest chilli along with intercrop yield (150.71 t ha-1), gross return (1101506 Rs. ha-1), net return (817969 Rs. ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (3.88) were obtained from treatment T12 (chilli @ 50% RDN + radish @ 25% RDN + beetroot @ 25% RDN).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1347 · show in text ↑
t0

“Intercropping of Radish and Beetroot with Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T12 had the highest net return at 817969 Rs. ha-1.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
chilli @ 50% RDN + radish @ 25% RDN + beetroot @ 25% RDNe0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
817969 Rs. ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The highest chilli along with intercrop yield (150.71 t ha-1), gross return (1101506 Rs. ha-1), net return (817969 Rs. ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (3.88) were obtained from treatment T12 (chilli @ 50% RDN + radish @ 25% RDN + beetroot @ 25% RDN).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1347 · show in text ↑
t0

“Intercropping of Radish and Beetroot with Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T12 had the highest benefit cost ratio at 3.88.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
chilli @ 50% RDN + radish @ 25% RDN + beetroot @ 25% RDNe0
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.88e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The highest chilli along with intercrop yield (150.71 t ha-1), gross return (1101506 Rs. ha-1), net return (817969 Rs. ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (3.88) were obtained from treatment T12 (chilli @ 50% RDN + radish @ 25% RDN + beetroot @ 25% RDN).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1347 · show in text ↑
t0

“Intercropping of Radish and Beetroot with Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors considered T12 the most suitable combination for productivity and economic return under Prayagraj agro-climatic conditions.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
chilli @ 50% RDN + radish @ 25% RDN + beetroot @ 25% RDNe0
Outcome
most suitable combination for higher productivity and economic returne0
Setting
Prayagraje0

Verbatim

e0

“treatment T12 (chilli @ 50% RDN + radish @ 25% RDN + beetroot @ 25% RDN) found the most suitable combination for higher productivity and economic return under Prayagraj agro-climatic conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1387–1581 · show in text ↑
t0

“Intercropping of Radish and Beetroot with Chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑

Raphanus sativus · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

intercropping · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results differ

19 papers: 15 positive, 4 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.