Paper · 2021 · Tropical Agroecosystems

INTERCROPPING CHILLI WITH GROUNDNUT IN CHAR LAND

M Kadir; Jubaidur Rahman; MI Riad; et al.

5
claims
6
verbatim quotes
9
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Intercropping is a farming practice involving two or more crop species, or genotypes, growing together and coexisting for a time. On the fringes of modern intensive agriculture, intercropping is important in many subsistence or low-input/resource-limited agricultural systems. Intercropping in order to improve land use efficiency, take advantage of intercropping facilitation and improve economic benefits. Also, linked with the higher yield, the associated higher amount of vegetables-legume by-product is preferred for animal feed or human consumption. The objective of this study is to find out the suitable groundnut – chilli intercropping system and increase productivity, economic and nutritional development of charland farmers of Bangladesh. In the experiment, intercropping system such as One row of chilli in between two normal rows of groundnut, two rows of chilli in between two normal rows of groundnut which was compared with sole groundnut and sole chilli production. Total yields of chilli /groundnut intercropping were higher than that of sole chilli and groundnut. chilli /groundnut intercropping is the efficient use of light because of complementary use of space between the chilli plants and the groundnut plants. Chilli /groundnut intercrop gross return and BCR per hectare were found higher than from sole crop system. The total yield of intercropped crops was greater than sole cropping shown by LER>1. The overall advantage of intercropping ranged from 71 to 81%. The highest land equivalent value of 81% was recorded from paired row chilli in between four normal rows of groundnut sowing arrangements indicated a yield advantage of 81% over sole crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilli and groundnut intercropping produced higher total yields than sole cropping.

Taxon
chilli /groundnute0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
Total yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
sole chilli and groundnute0

Verbatim

e0

“Total yields of chilli /groundnut intercropping were higher than that of sole chilli and groundnut.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1083 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropped chilli and groundnut used light efficiently through complementary space use.

Taxon
chilli /groundnute0
Outcome
efficient use of lighte0
Qualifier
complementary use of spacee0

Verbatim

e0

“chilli /groundnut intercropping is the efficient use of light because of complementary use of space between the chilli plants and the groundnut plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1235 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilli and groundnut intercrop gross return and BCR per hectare were higher than in sole crops.

Taxon
Chilli /groundnute0
Treatment
intercrope0
Outcome
gross return and BCR per hectaree0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
sole crop systeme0

Verbatim

e0

“Chilli /groundnut intercrop gross return and BCR per hectare were found higher than from sole crop system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1342 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilli and groundnut intercropping had LER above 1 and an overall advantage of 71 to 81%.

Taxon
CHILLI WITH GROUNDNUTt0
Outcome
overall advantage of intercroppinge0
Value
71 to 81%e0
Qualifier
LER>1e0

Verbatim

e0

“The total yield of intercropped crops was greater than sole cropping shown by LER>1. The overall advantage of intercropping ranged from 71 to 81%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1489 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHILLI WITH GROUNDNUT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–35 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paired row chilli among four normal groundnut rows achieved the highest land equivalent value, 81%.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
paired row chilli in between four normal rows of groundnute0
Outcome
land equivalent valuee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
81%e0
Comparator
sole crope0

Verbatim

e0

“The highest land equivalent value of 81% was recorded from paired row chilli in between four normal rows of groundnut sowing arrangements indicated a yield advantage of 81% over sole crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1490–1678 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results differ

19 papers: 15 positive, 4 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

intercropping · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

119 papers: 79 positive, 40 negative or no effect

78 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

115 papers more in this group

See all 119 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.